2/21/2011
The Dangers and Power of Pesticides Rachel Carson writes of how pesticides and human interferences with nature have changed the course of the human races future. Carson describes the drastic changes and mutations in nature that pesticides have introduced by the pesticides. She then goes on to describe the effects of the pesticides on people and the animals. Also Carson talks about the long term effects and how they will affect our descendants. Carson’s essay tells of the consequences and havoc that will occur. Carson describes the slippery slope that the human race has started down with the use of pesticides. The use of pesticides does not actually kill off one hundred percent of the pests and weeds that it intends to kill. The poisons will indeed kill most of the insects, rodents, and weeds that they are intended to kill. But what survives after the spraying occurs is a pest that has been exposed to the pesticide. When the animal or weed is introduced to the pesticide its immune system adapt to the poison. These mutations are what lead to the slippery slope. Each surviving pest procreating, leaving its offspring with the adapted immune system, therefore the pesticide must be changed in order kill 2 the new mutated pests. So eventually more and more pesticides are created to protect the crop. Carson says, “destructive insects often undergo a ‘flareback’ or resurgence, after spraying, in numbers greater than before” (8) Not only must researchers develop new pesticides, but also farmers need to use more. The farmers use the poison for temporary relief from the pest problems confronting them. The pesticides are a quick and easy solution for a pest issue that, ironically, have left people with a larger and stronger force of pests. Carson says that the problem is not actually with the pests, but with overproduction in farming. She argues that the aim of researchers and the government should be fix overproduction instead of dealing with “mythical situations”. Carson compares the overuse of pesticides to the dangers to human beings with the damages from the A-Bomb. Not only are the chemicals dangerous to the human race, they also are devastating to the animals. These pesticides kill many insects and leave many diseased or poisonous insects in the pesticide’s wake. These poisonous or diseased insects are eaten by predators that digest the insects that have already been infected with the poisons and diseases. These poisoned often serve as prey for more predators. These new predators inherit the diseases from their prey. The chemical runoff trickles down to streams and rivers that poison and kill fish and their predators as well. Countless species of wildlife are being sacrificed for the unnecessarily powerful protection of crops. Not only wildlife is being immediately affected by these dangerous pesticides. People’s foods are also contaminated. The pesticides are sprayed in abundance on the crops that cover everything in sight and soaked into the soil that new crop 3 yields grow from each year. Carson states, scientists introduce “500 new chemicals to which the bodies of men and animals are required somehow to adapt each year, chemicals totally outside the limits of biologic experience” (7) These harmful poisons are consumed by unknowing people each day, with a considerable amount of danger to the consumer. The damage these pesticides may ultimately bring upon mankind is still unknown. The effects may be damaging for generations to come. There is proof that radiation results in birth defects, diseases, and mutations. The nuclear bombs dropped in Japan during WWII still show residual effects on the people affected by the blast. The people did not even have to feel the blast to be affected, but the radiation in the water supply and airborne radiation caused much trouble for the future generations of Japanese. Carson worries the vast amounts of chemicals and poisons being put into the bodies of people everyday will result in similar consequences. She compares the pesticides to the nuclear radiation in the essay: “Similarly, chemicals sprayed on croplands or forests or gardens lie long in soil, entering into human organisms, passing from one to another in a chain of poisoning and death” (5) She describes that these poisons may result in a similarly devastating fashion to people as the nuclear blasts. There is no limit of horrific possibilities future generations will endure. Carson believes that mankind has left its future with a difficult mess to clean up. She tells the readers of the dangerous possibilities that pesticides have introduced. The pesticides in fact over time created super pests that adapt extremely quickly and return in greater numbers than befor. She also discusses how pesticides 4 are used to kill a select few insects or weeds but end up killing entire species of animals and can even kill people. The most frightening consequence that Carson has brought up in her essay is the possible dangers that may affect our children and children’s children. Rachel Carson opened the eyes of millions with her essay “The Obligation to Endure” to how pesticides can and are affecting mankind.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Chapter 2: The trend of humans harming their environment has grown upward for a time now. Carson claims in Chapter 2 that individuals have debased nature with hazardous and lethal chemicals. She goes into detail in this chapter that the amount of pesticides and chemicals being created and put into the atmosphere is dangerous and happening at a very rapid rate. At a point in the chapter, Carson calls pesticides “biocides” which goes to show that they do much more than just kill the intended insects they are meant for. Rather than that, pesticides kill all creatures including ourselves.…
- 782 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This supports the argument Carson has about the pesticide to be discontinued. She points out how the Wildlife center agrees and believes that parathion has the ability to harm all living things besides…
- 306 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Goodall exemplifies,”they have been attacked by farmers, gardeners, and governments. Unfortunately the weapons of choice have been chemical pesticides-and this has led to horrific damage of all too many organisms”(62). This depicts that beetles will become extinct due to “chemical pesticides”. Chemical pesticides cause organisms mostly insects to perish if it damages certain things such as crops. Knowing how self-centered most humans are this product may be used extensively and damage more than what is needed. The ecosystem is being affected the more people try to get rid of organisms and especially when there is no background understanding of the role of these animals. Each living thing is a part of a puzzle. It is like a play but particular individuals are interfering with the…
- 573 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This can happen if pesticides are utilized on products or creature crowds such that other characteristic cures are no more successful. The rancher then has no choice yet to utilize the pesticides a seemingly endless amount of time in each rural cycle.…
- 181 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Rachel Carson uses horrifying evidence to grab the reader’s attention. She writes of the destructive chemicals in pesticides used on all types of vegetation for the destruction of insects, but the chemical war on bugs shall never be won. In her essay Rachel Carson explains “ …insects, in a triumphant vindication of Darwin’s principle of the survival of the fittest, have evolved super races immune to the particular insecticides used, hence a deadlier one has always to be developed” (614). Pesticides intention may be only to destroy a few types of weeds and insects but Rachel Carson poses the question “Can anyone believe it is possible to lay down such a barrage of poisons on the surface of the earth without making it unfit for all life?” (614). Carson also touches on man-made radiation releasing harsh chemicals into the air, such as Strontium 90, which comes down as rain and soaks into the earth or even “…in time takes up its abode in the bones of a human being, there to remain until his…
- 1083 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This entry focuses mainly on the chemical DDT, which is over consumed on various vegetation, however, the overall idea is regarding our environment and how human actions are abolishing it, although it may be unintentional. To be more specific, the central idea consists of the environmental actions that are backfiring on our population in a negative way. Furthermore, in my opinion, Rachel Carson desires to spread awareness about the harmful deeds that are destroying our environment and our society’s health.…
- 221 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
They say that the pesticides ward off insects and bugs that would otherwise harm crops in the agricultural industry. Farmers that use pesticides claim that the prices of produce and other food products have lowered. For instance, without pesticides, there would be more crops lost to pests, which results in smaller harvests, and farmers would have to raise the price of their produce to accommodate their losses. But, the benefits of pesticides do not outweigh the disadvantages. As stated before, pesticides pose a threat to the environment, to pollinators, and to all organisms that ingest it. According to flowpsychology.com, experts say that insects exposed to the repellents can build up resistance over time, which makes the pesticides ineffective. Even though others say that pesticides help us, it will aid us more to ban…
- 465 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The 1950's to 1960's were characterized by and catalyzed the national environmental movement, which increased people's environmental awareness in the nation. Rachel Carson, a biologist, wrote a book discussing the destructive effects of pesticides to inform the public and urge them to act against the use of these damaging poisons. In the excerpt from Rachel Carson's Silent Spring, Carson states that the use of parathion is not worth the damage down to the natural world by describing its widespread damage to nature and placing guilt on farmers' for their ignorance to the harm done on society.…
- 903 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The main idea of the book was that the perceived split between man and nature isn’t real and that your body is associated to the world around you. In Rachel Carson’s time, nature was considered to be an “it” and also man had a dominion over animals which some people took as permission to kill them without any guilt. Rachel Carlson highlighted that “we” humans are not distinct from “it” and we were dependent on the world around us. Rachel’s Carson’s book was a success as it raised awareness of the social hazards of DDT As of now pesticides have been increasingly regulated, and also safety standards for pesticides have been improved with much credit to Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. This paper is based on the thesis is that Rachel Carson’s Silent spring was not only prescient in 1962 when it was first published but it remains…
- 1228 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This passage is relevant in that it demonstrates to the reader how such dangerous chemicals may have become so widely used. Producers of pesticides poured millions of dollars into the successful advertisement of their products. No matter the true risks, any potential…
- 370 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
This truth can affect a specific group because of some individuals that once made or continue to make poor choices. Yet the majority of the group at times will endure some sort of judgment and this can affect how they are most often perceived by the rest of society. Even though the majority of ranchers do not act so foolishly as others do, there are the few that give these hard honest workers a bad name. These men that do the unnecessary wreak havoc on the environment and even at times may harm their animals. By committing such grossly acts, the ranchers with harmful choices spray chemicals to enhance crops or carelessly use pesticides for any invasive species trying to ingest crops. These pesticides can contaminate soil, water sources, and other vegetation. Adding on to that, killing insects or any varmints, pesticides can be very toxic to a host of other organisms which include birds, insects, fish, and plants. Insecticides are frequently the most heavily toxic type of pesticides, but herbicides can also be a risk to any organisms that weren’t targeted. The enhancement of crops and usage of pesticide can betray the FDA guidelines which ultimately can affect a person's health. In a written article called Effects of Pesticides on Human Health by Toxipedia it is mentioned, “Pesticides are designed to kill and because their mode of action is not specific to one species, they often kill or harm organisms other than pests, including humans. The World Health Organization estimates that there are 3 million cases of pesticide poisoning each year and up to 220,000 deaths, primarily in developing countries. The application of pesticides is often not very precise, and unintended exposures occur to other organisms in the general area where pesticides are applied. Children, and indeed any young and developing organisms, are particularly vulnerable to the harmful effects of pesticides. Even very low…
- 2028 Words
- 9 Pages
Good Essays -
Rachel Carson provides examples of understandable “plain folks” to express her argument to the reader. It was said that, “…In California orchards sprayed this same parathion, workers handling foliage that had been treated a month earlier collapsed and went into shock, and escaped death only through skilled medical attention.” She then goes on to ask, “Does Indiana still raise any boys who roam through woods or fields and might even explore the margins of a river?...” These specific examples illustrate how much Americans do not see that they are causing pain to each other, and in severe cases causing death. Rachel Carson, in illustrating her point that American attitudes toward the environment need to change, points the finger at American farmers who are using parathion and other poisons, which are the cause of death to humans and birds which bringing harm to the environment. What Rachel Carson is trying to get Americans, especially American farmers, to see is that in order to stop all the killing and harm to the environment, and to each other, they need to stop the use of parathion and other poisons.…
- 674 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
In America today, many people do not realize the impact they have on the environment. We come from a more educated generation, yes, but many people do not realize, that even just recycling can led to less deforestation, and ensuring that the environment of many animals is still there and safe. Much like how deforestation can negatively affect animals, it negatively affects us, less trees means less oxygen, and less oxygen, less to breathe, causing more. In Silent Spring, by Rachel Carson, she attempts to enlighten the reader on how the use of pesticides has an overall negative effect on the environment, animals and humans. Carson draws this conclusion based on her belief that humanity is ignorant, and that we are under the false impression that we are in some way superior. Following this she also suggests that we, as humans, are victimizing nature, and attempting to cure it like a disease.…
- 979 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
In the passage from “Silent Spring”, by Rachel Carson, she portrays her strong emotions about American’s attitude towards the environment and the mindset obtained that it is justifiable to kill species because of an inconvenience they might cause. Carson is able to render that through rhetorical strategies such as exemplification, repetition, and cause and effect.…
- 648 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Primarily, Carson victimizes the animals who are being massacred by the seemingly unstoppable use of pesticides, characterizing them as helpless and innocent. She mentions that, “Such rabbits or raccoons or opossums as may have roamed those…
- 1191 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays