Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Octavian' Rise to Power

Good Essays
535 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Octavian' Rise to Power
The Roman Republic’s desperate attempt to retain their democratic traditions and beliefs led to the assassination of their new dictator Julius Caesar. The lack of a leader created turmoil and civil war in the Roman Republic and thousands of people lost their lives. Octavian, Julius Caesar's adopted son, took this opportunity to rise to power and beat down the armies of Marc Antony and his wife Cleopatra in order to gain complete rule over Rome. Later, in honor of his greatness, Octavian’s name was changed into Augustus. With his new name and supreme authority, Caesar Augustus transformed the old Roman Republic into a glorious empire, designed to look like a republic in order to keep the democratic tradition the Roman citizens were so scared of losing.

The Roman Republic had a democratic government with no ruler who had absolute power; instead, they used senators as representatives of the citizens. When Julius Caesar threatened this free government by attempting to become an emperor for life, a few roman senators conspired to kill him and succeeded. Augustus, who had the same goal, learned from his father’s mistakes and carefully planned out his rule and decided to keep the democratic government to make his people happy. However, in order to become a dictator and keep a democracy, Augustus gained power in every crucial position of the government, becoming the Imperator, or commander in chief over the Roman military, and the Pontifex Maximus so he could have complete control over the empire's religious affairs. Augustus also addressed himself as a Consul to gain the support of the higher class patricians, and a Tribune to gain the support of the lower class plebeians. This way, Augustus made it seem as if there were still different people running the government, but in reality there was only one supreme leader. Modern historians identify this type of political system as a Principate or a monarchy disguised as an oligarchical republic. Using this democratic mask, Augustus quietly established himself as a king who secretly controlled all aspects of the Roman Republic.

During Caesar Augustus's rule, there was a long period of peace and prosperity for the Roman Empire. There were fewer revolts against Roman rule and most of the Mediterranean world was united under one empire. Using this idea of peace brought only by Augustus, the new Caesar made his citizens belief that the best way to live was to keep him in charge. Augustus help anniversary celebrations every ten years as a way to make Caesar look like he was being elected over and over again. This solidified the idea that Augustus deserved the position he undertook as emperor.

Caesar Augustus turned the old Roman Republic into a dictatorship by disguising his new empire as a democratic civilization. Under Augustus's rule, the romans prospered and peace prevailed all across the Mediterranean. Even though Augustus had complete control, he deceived his people into thinking they still had a say in what happened in their government, which ultimately led to his success. The Caesar strategically became every part of the government and refused to be called an emperor or king. So, with this illusion, Caesar Augustus became the all-powerful emperor of Rome.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Augustus had the ability to control the voters to vote for his reccomendation. In order to stop disturbances, senate gave Augustus Consular Potestas. This gave Augustus consul powers for life without being consul. This meant Rome would still elect two consuls every year.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Monarchy is defined as ‘a form of government with a monarch at the head’ and was the first arrangement of power in Rome after its founding by Romulus, who reigned from 753-715BC.1 However, by 510BC, the despotic actions of Tarquinius Superbus marked the end of a succession of increasingly tyrannical kings, and the ‘Roman Republic’ was established. This system was based on a sharing of power between, foremost, two consuls who were elected by the people and held office for only one year, then 300 senators, and two popular assemblies, the comitia curiata and the comitia centuriata. With such a spread of auctoritas, the Roman state would be at less risk from corrupt men with their aims set on an autocratic rule. The precepts of the Roman republic were honourable and upheld, in the most part, until the civil wars of 91BC onwards disturbed it, culminating in what many would consider the fall of the Republic, and thus the establishment of a monarchy, with Augustus at the battle of Actium on 2nd September 31BC.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beware the Ides of March

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Roman government was in ruin when Julius Caesar came to power in 49 BC. Rome was too large to control itself, and the only seat with effective power was the dictator. Caesar was the first emperor of Rome, and the Senate hated that he called himself king. The members of senate deemed him a tyrant, as seen in Plutarch: “Therefore the plots which had previously been formed separately, often by groups of two or three, were united in a general conspiracy, since even the populace no longer were pleased with present conditions, but both secretly and openly rebelled at his tyranny and cried out for defenders of their liberty.” (Plutarch LXXX) The Senate also wanted Caesar out of power because each of them wanted to become the dictator themselves, which would have resulted in further conflict and a bloodier war than the final Roman war.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Augustus reduced the size of the Senate. Instead of being above them he tried to work equally with them or place them and subordinates in his reforms. Because of the reduction, he was able to rid the Senate of incompetent senators. In order to join the Senate you were appointed by Augustus himself and the roles were received by hereditary. When you look at how Augustus created this system you're able to see that the Senate still had some power and it was shared with Augustus. Senate was in charge of appointing governors where as Augustus focused on military commanders. It was a sort of checks and balances system so that…

    • 464 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Romans overthrew the Etruscans in 509 B.C.E. The Etruscans had ruled over the Romans for hundreds of years. Once free, the Romans established a republic, a government in which citizens elected representatives to rule on their behalf. The highest positions in the government were held by two consuls who ruled the Roman republic. A senate composed of Patricians elected these consuls and at this time, lower-class citizens, or plebeians, had virtually no say in the government. Both men and women were citizens in the Roman Republic, but only men could vote. Under certain circumstances, the senate and the consuls could appoint a temporary dictator to rule for a limited time until the crisis was resolved. One of the innovations of the Roman Republic was the notion of equality under the law. In 449 B.C.E., government leaders carved some of Rome 's most important laws into 12 great tablets. During the last three centuries of the republic, Rome experienced a long series of civil wars, economic as well as political issues, and civil crisis caused by the dictatorship of Julius Caesar. After Caesar’s death, another civil war broke out destroying what was left of the Roman republic. Caesar’s adopted son, Octavian, joined forces with a general named Mark Antony and a politician named Lepidus. They took control of Rome for ten years as the Second triumvirate. The alliance ended in violence and jealousy. Octavian forced Lepidus to retire and then became rivals with Mark Antony. Octavian believed Mark Antony was plotting to rule Rome from Egypt,…

    • 1420 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mark Antony twisted the “dagger” of Caesar’s death ever so slightly and then threatened to unleash them on the Senators. But Caesar had named his grandnephew Gaius Octavius his sole heir. Octavius, who came into rule when he was 18, became Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus or Octavian, the son of the great Caesar. “While Antony dealt with Decimus Brutus in the first round of the new civil wars, Octavian consolidated his tenuous…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Roman Republic and the Roman Empire highly differ in their political structures. The republic: created in 509 BCE. was a form of representative democracy. It consisted of 2 consuls of which were appointed by the senate and then voted on. These consuls were the head officers and the were appointed for one year. The senate was one of two legislative bodies comprised of 300 senators and 10 tribunes who were all patricians. The other body was knows as the tribal assembly and was made up of plebeians who met in a forum to vote on things such as consuls. When Julius Caesar was assassinated a civil war broke out in Rome. The senate was no longer trusted to rule Rome bringing the republic to an end and the empire to a beginning in 27 BCE. An empire is a form of government in which one person -the emperor- had all the real power. Emperors took power through force or inheritance and ruled for life, though many were assassinated. Some emperors embodied peaceful, prosperous, philosophical and basically just "great" praises. Where as others were vicious, mentally disturbed doctoral murders. The reason for the difference between the roman republic and empire is that in the republic the goal was to avoid having one person with too much power where as in the empire it was basically that due to the corruption with in the senate.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Augustus Caesar was Julius Caesar’s grandnephew. Once Julius Caesar was assassinated he left the Roman Republic to be handed down to Augustus, Octavian at the time, to rule. He later gained the name Augustus once he became ruler of the Roman Empire. His ruling exemplified the transition of Rome from a republic to an empire. He ruled from 31 B.C. to A.D. 14 (SPARKNOTES). This was a time of great prosperity and expansion for Rome.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the battle of Actium (31 B.C.), Octavian remained the sole leader from the Triumvirate to rule the largest Empire of that period. Shrewd and subtle politician, Octavian learnt from his predecessor, Julius Caesar, and avoided his mistakes. During his reign, Julius Caesar forced the Senate to proclaim him dictator for life and arrogantly acted as a king (wearing the purple robe of Roman kings and encouraging religious cults in his honor). In this manner, Caesar publicly defied the republican tradition and the conservative Senate, which lead to his death in 44 B.C. Therefore, Octavian realized the strong allegiance and affection of the Senate and People towards the political system of the Republic. Octavian did not underestimate nor neglect this allegiance, but rather used it to gradually introduce legitimate monarchy and bring what Romans most wanted: peace and tolerance.…

    • 931 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics had much to do with the fall of each empire. In 202 B.C., the Han dynasty established a monarchy. It consisted of one emperor and several different chancellors. In the beginning of Rome's Empire, most of the cities had kings. However in about 509 B.C the Romans decided to establish a government, which is known as a republic. Unlike the Han's monarchy, not one single person ruled over everyone else. For a while each type of government worked, but the thought of acquiring more power became some rulers' main focus and eventually led to the fall of their empires. In 60 B.C, a war general known as Julius Caesar, became very popular throughout Rome. Many of the citizens looked up to his bravery and other respected men started to envy him. Because of his popularity there was talk of a dictatorship. This did not settle well with the other leaders of Rome and on March 14, 44 B.C, the day also known as the Ides of March, Julius Caesar was…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Roman Empire Flaws

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The early Roman Republic will always be remembered for its revolutionary government. Citizen-elected leaders who represented both the rich and the poor worked together for the well-being of the country as a whole. After the decline of the Empire began, however, politics in Rome became less and less respectable. The emperor, who was at one time chosen fairly and based on merit and potential as a leader, was now being given away on other terms. The Praetorian…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years there have been many events that have taken place. These events not only affected the people and the world of the present at that time, but also the future and even the way things are today. Knowing this we must ask ourselves what defines us as Americans? There are series of events that all together add up to define us as Americans such as, the Constitution, Westward Expansion, and the Civil War and Reconstruction. What do you think defines us as Americans?…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Republic was great civilization with a very complex political system that still influences governments today. The Roman Republic consisted of three parts. The highest being the Consul that was made up of two male members who are elected annually. Secondly there was the Senate made up of elder statesmen that advised the Consul and finally there was the Assemblies where participants voted by group on issues.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    majority and that “A minority is powerless while it conforms to the majority” (Thoreau 231) are…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this piece of work, I shall aim at a critical review of literature relating to reducing a fall in order people with a mental health problem. I shall critically analyse the strengths and weakness of the various strategies that have been used such as a complementary therapy in reducing falls in older people with dementia. In this assignment, I shall reflect upon my experience from my practice placement, where I was involved in the reduction of fall as a therapeutic intervention in order to minimise the injuries related to fall.…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays