Oedipus Rex Fate Vs Free Will Essay

The philosophical debate between fate vs. free will, decides whether the events that take place were in the characters control. Were the events that take place pre-determined to happen? Or were the characters actions the only thing factor in the decisions they make. In the Play Oedipus Rex, Fate vs. Free will is a major factor of the story. The story is set in ancient Greece where Oedipus becomes king of a small city after the death of the old king. The key question is; did Oedipus make all his decisions by himself, or did fate already plan and execute what was going to happen to him? In this particular story there is strong evidence to swing to both sides, however, the fate of Oedipus was the biggest factor. In the play Oedipus Rex, fate
What happened to him could not be avoided because it was his fate. This was easy to see fate at work because the story established the prophecy, and throughout the play you were just waiting for the main character to find out that the prophecy he feared so much came true anyway. It could be said that the free will choice to leave his adoptive parents were the most important part. This is a good argument against fate because it shows that his choices were the most important part of the play. However, He would have to leave his parents’ home at some point anyway which is still his fate. Was it his choice to leave his home the one-day the King was out on a hunting trip? A coincidence? Or fate? Fate vs. Free will is usually a balancing act or an argument. Some say both free will and fate worked together to complete the task at hand. However if the choices you make still lead you to your fate, which opinion carries the most power? If your fate, the ultimate goal, still comes about in the end of the story anyway regardless of what life decisions Oedipus made. Then, fate is what ruled his