Preview

Of Mice and Men Trial

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
329 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Of Mice and Men Trial
The trial of George for the murder of Lenny was very complicated. It was clear to me there was no malice or premeditation in this murder case. However, justice had to be served for the loss of life. I was the third prosecuting attorney in this case and felt the sentencing was fair and just.

During the trial there were several witnesses who testified for both the defense and prosecution. However, few were of real help and did not provide strong testimony. If anything, I think the defense witnesses helped the prosecution more because most of them cared for Lenny and believed that George should be found guilty for what he had done. The defense couldn’t provide strong evidence that proved George was protecting Lenny from the angry mod that wanted to kill him. This allowed for the prosecution to easily find George guilty of voluntary manslaughter.

After we had time to cross examine the witnesses and George, it was time for the jury to make a decision on whether George should be found innocent or guilty. His fate was now in their hands. Deliberation was quick, which usually is not a good thing for the defense. I was a little worried the jurors would feel sorry for George because Lenny was his best friend, but that wasn’t the case. The jury found George guilty of voluntary manslaughter and sentenced him to 12 years in prison. From the very beginning I felt this would be an easy case to win, especially if the prosecution went for Manslaughter vs. murder in the 1st or 2nd degree.

Representing the prosecution was a satisfying role and I was pleased with the results. I really enjoyed playing the role because I got to cross examine the witnesses and George, and make the closing argument for our side.

In conclusion, I think the trial was swift and fair. Although the story is tragic the sentencing was appropriate for the crime

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    B) Dr. Sweet was found innocent, but his brother, Henry, was declared guilty of manslaughter and sentenced to 20 years in prison.…

    • 1783 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    George treatment did prove Lennie wrong. I don't think that George acted mean but did act mean for the way of killing a guy. I think that Lennie got proven wrong that George would've done something wrong. Also in chapter six it stated that when Lennie put down the gun, "George looked down at the gun. '' So that one way to explain Lennie that George could've done something bad at the time but didn't kept the conversation going.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of Laws worst cases documents that are both kept tucked away and forgotten for so many years are revealed. Many of the suspects still remain unpursued. Is was a mistake in history that can not be undone. Steven Truscott beat the justice system afterall those years of doing him…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What caught my attention to this play was that the two authors were passionate about this theme for the play and obviously researched the history of the actual trial, in order to portray it as realistically as possible. This hard work and attention to detail created a very informative and memorable play. (Although some…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Of Mice and Men After reading the story Of Mice and Men, I agreed with George's decision however unethical it may seem. I do not fully condone the death sentence but my opinion still stands. As I will explain, it seems George had no other decision but to take the actions he did to ensure Lenny wouldn't be killed by strangers cruelly and painfully. In a way it was his responsibility. I will explain my reasoning for this line of thought.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Steve Arey and Terry Jordan were young, inexperienced lawyers who should have never even been considered for a capital case. Judge Persin, the presiding Judge in the case, however, decided on these two gentlemen because other more experienced lawyers refused to take the case because of the huge financial sacrifice it would require. Albeit public speculation that Judge Persin's previous profession as a prosecutor had led him to heavily favor the prosecution, his decision stood. The two prosecutors who Arey and Jordan would be opposed by were Mickey McGlothlin and Tom Scott. Both prosecutors had far more experience than the defense lawyers, but that didn't stop Judge Persin from appointing Arey and Jordan to the case. It was an obvious mismatch, intentional or not, and was just the beginning of many problems that would arise for the defendant's case.…

    • 1746 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What George did to his friend Lennie was all that he could do and George had no other choice. In the story Of Mice and Men, written by John Steinbeck, George has to kill his friend Lennie because there a mod coming after Lennie trying to kill him. George sees no other option but to kill him before the mob gets to him. Lennie has also hurt too many helpless things, he killed mice, a puppy, and now a human. Lennie has never been punished for his actions and unfortunately it had to come to this. What George did to Lennie was completely justified…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    My first reason for believing that George did the right thing is to speculate on what may have happened if he had not killed Lennie. Curley didn’t hold much affection for his wife, and from the moment he’s introduced in the book, its clear he is against Lennie. He has always been bitter about his size and strength and ever since Lennie crushed his hand he has been waiting for some excuse to get him back. ‘I’ll kill the big son-of-a-bitch myself. I’ll shoot ‘im in the guts.’ If George had not mercifully killed Lennie in the most painless way possible, he would have been brutally killed by Curley in revenge for his wife’s murder. Lennie got the closest any of them ever could to the dream of having their own…

    • 1169 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    George's minimal involment in two previous cases one being a mere passenger in a stolen car, and the other an unarmed latecomer to the schoolyard fight- he was charged with assault with a deadly weapon and, car theft, both felonies. Later he took part in an Armed Robbery where one person was shot, the ringleader of the robbery and besides him no one was harmed. Instead George was looking at up to 29 years for this sentence. A bit unfair for a child that was bounced around from foster home to foster home, who really didn't no any…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Verdict Ethics

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “The Verdict” is a movie that deals with medical and legal ethics. Frank Gavin is an alcoholic who hasn’t won any of his cases in the past three years. Mickey, his former partner, gives him a medical malpractice case that is sure to settle for a large amount of money. The case of Deborah Ann Kay, a mother who was given anesthetic when she had just eaten inhaled her vomit and is now in a coma. The Donaheys, her sister and brother in law are hoping for a good settlement and Frank assures them that they have a strong case. While the case is going on he meets Laura, a woman at a bar who he falls in love with. Frank goes to visit Deborah Ann Kay in the hospital and is affected by her condition. He meets with the defendants who run the Catholic hospital where the incident happened. The defendants offer $210,000 to settle out of court but Frank declines. Frank feels this is his chance to do something right. Everyone was not happy with Frank declining the settlement. A lot of things start to go wrong for Frank in the case: the brother in law finds out how much the settlement was and how he denied it, his expert medical witness disappears, his substitute witness testimony is questioned, the defendant attorney Concannon has an expert legal team, and the Judge favors Concannon. Mickey finds out Laura is a spy for the opposing side and Frank punches her in the face. Frank then finds Kaitlin Costello Pryce, a nurse that was asked to change her notes on the admittance form after the incident to hide Dr. Towler’s error. Deborah Ann Kay had eaten 1 hour before admittance and no anesthetic is supposed to be given if so. Even though the testimony is not supposed to be used because of legal technicalities it stuns the courtroom. Frank then tells the jury a closing statement about justice and truth. Frank wins the case and the jury wants to increase the award.…

    • 1288 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Biased testimony towards the defendant resulted in a prejudice jury. Very frequently, statements like ‘We heard the facts, didn’t we?’ or ‘Pay attention to the facts’ are expressed in the jury room. The 4th Juror cited that the murder weapon was a knife so unique that ‘the storekeeper who sold it to him identified the knife in court and said it was the only one of its kind he ever had in stock.’ The 8th Juror argues that ‘It’s possible that the boy lost the knife and that someone else stabbed his father with a similar knife.’ None of the Juror’s believes this possibility as they have already established their prejudices against the accused. The 10th Juror says ‘Let’s talk facts. These people are born to lie… They think different. They act different.’ These are not ‘facts’ but prejudice opinions made by the 10th Juror about the socio-economic status of the boy. It can assumed that the ‘facts’ presented in this case can be viewed as biased opinions and reports that impairs the true facts.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oj Simpson Trial

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As expected, the presiding judge ordered that Simpson be held without bail. The following day, a grand jury was called to determine whether to indict him for the murders. Two days later, on June 23, the grand jury was dismissed as a result of excessive media coverage, which could have influenced its neutrality. Rather than a grand jury hearing, a probable cause hearing was held to determine whether or not to bring Simpson to trial, which was a minor victory for Simpson's lawyers who would now be able to get to evidence as it was being presented by the prosecution to a grand jury hearing. For the defense case Simpson hired a team of high-profile lawyers, including F. Lee Bailey, Robert Kardashian, Robert Shapiro, Alan Dershowitz, Johnnie Cochran, Gerald Uelmen Carl E. Douglas and Shawn…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plus, George couldn't let them hurt his friend. He knew Lennie didn't mean to do the things he did and that Lennie had an illness. He couldn't help the things he did neither did he try to do them on purpose. But they however don't know Lennie like he did and didn't share the bond George and Lennie did. So, they didn't care how bad they would hurt him. They just wanted him to die because of him causing death upon a woman. George knew they wanted Lennie to suffer and George knew he couldn't live with that happening. So he took it upon him self and did his friend a favor. This killing happened because of ones mental illness and the euthanasia one had for another. On the other hand George could have just fled with Lennie instead of killing him but, it got to be to much for him so he ended it.…

    • 607 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe Lennies death is It was only partially morally justified. George was Lennie's protector and knew, more than anyone else, that he was a kind and gentle soul. He had the mind of a child but unequalled masculine strength. Hence, he committed murder without meaning to. He was going to get jailed and was going to get the death penalty - George knew that there was no way out this time. Hence, he killed him as an act of mercy - it was, in moral terms, a kinder and more merciful…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have all gathered here today to bring justice to a poor old man, who was murdered in his own house. Everyone in the court was brought here to decide if this man is guilty of being insane or guilty of murder. The murder confused to stocking this old man and claimed that he killed him because of his eye. The murders cut of all his limbs after killing him and hide him under the floorboard. When police came to his house he confused after a few minutes of silence. After a few days, lawyers, jurors, a judge, an expert, a witness, the murder, and I have all gathered here to bring justice to this old man. From my point of view, as the documenter, this trail seems like a tough decision. As of now I feel like the murder is guilty of 1st degree murder. Now at 1:44 PM the prosecution lawyer begins.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics