Introduction
Begin by exploring what topic the question is talking about so in this case the question is talking about how Bill has revoked his acceptance.
Define the term revoke his acceptance.
Main Body
Argument for the point that there is a contract that has been bound:
Bill has posted a reply saying that he had ‘confirmed’ and ‘accepted the offer. According to the High Court it was plausible that a reply that had ‘confirmed’ was sufficient to have an offer accepted.
Offer had already been accepted.
According to the ‘Postal Rule’ as soon as Bill posted his reply there was an effective acceptance.
Morrison v Tholke (1963)
Argument for the point that there is no contract:
Lord Denning's quote in Entores ‘But if there should be a case where the offeror without any fault on his part does not receive the message of acceptance --- yet the sender of it reasonably believes it has got home when it has not, then I think there is no contract’
Here due to the fact that Alice said to let him know by ‘next Saturday’ even though Bill gave his acceptance, believed that he still had time and before Alice’ deadline revoked his acceptance therefore it could be argued that there was no acceptance.
Talk about Lord Fraser’s quote ‘an acceptance sent by telex directly from the acceptor’s office to the offeror’s office should be treated as if it were an instantaneous communication between principals, like a telephone conversation.’ - Lord Fraser’s quote is basically instigating the fact that there is no contract as Alice should have received this message earlier as Bill telephoned a day prior to when the deadline was.
Conclusion
Evaluate whether there was a contract when Bill posted the letter and evaluate whether when Bill telephoned Alice to revoke his acceptance it was a success or the fact that there was a contract already binded.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Mary made an offer to Liam and Mike for them to paint her house for $2500. There is no statement on whether or not they verbally accepted her offer which in this case does not make it an agreement. It makes it an offer and since Mary saw Bill’s advertisement, which is considered an offer, and by her calling and making arrangements with Bill’s she accepted his offer.…
- 370 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
As explained in the definition of acceptance provided above, Alex saying he would pay the £11 000 is an unqualified expression of assent to the terms of Betty’s offer. In order to be successful . He would need to prove that he accepted the offer. In this case we must consider the postal rule, which is important in determining whether acceptance has taken place. The postal rules states that “a letter of acceptance provided, that it is correctly addressed and stamped, takes effect when posted.” (Adams v Lindsell). In order for the Postal rule to take effect, it must be found in this situation that it was reasonable to use the post. In this case, because Betty’s offer to Alex was sent by post it can be considered reasonable for Alex to use the same means of communication. Lastly in order for this rule to take effect there must be no exclusion of it in Betty’s offer. By her telling Alex to “let her know” she has been vague regarding the means he should use to respond to her offer. It can be argued that the postal rule was in effect, which means that as soon as he posted the letter, even though she had not received it, placing his acceptance in the post meant that there was a fictional meeting of minds, which concluded the offer and gave effect to the…
- 989 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
6. “Assuming arguendo, that this email does not constitute an agreement, what consideration supports this agreement?” (Sean P. Melvin, 2011, p. 155). Consideration would be they went back and forth about the…
- 461 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
An acceptance is an agreement to be bound to the terms of an offer. The fax by Tallula is actually an offer to buy the cookers at $100 (see Harvey v Facey ).…
- 1114 Words
- 5 Pages
Powerful Essays -
It’s important in deciding if valid acceptance has occurred to acknowledge that acceptance must be clear, absolute and identical to the terms4 in this case Ian in not having full knowledge of the terms has accepted without full knowledge of the offer. He did not communicate acceptance to the offeror Jessie5. Ian in his actions of the visit to Jessie’s house to look at the car and his daughter taking full possession of the car cannot be seen as valid acceptance as Ian acted in ignorance of the offer6…
- 761 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
This is terminant’ of acceptance as acceptance has been communicated to CT effectively. Acceptance cannot be revoked even if Homer had not read the email: WenKhiem V Arndt. As it was not required for acceptance to be effective supported by S13 (2) ETA and postal rule. Therefore, as acceptance is effective and the oral statement by KK regarding price change to $0.60/kg does not affect due to S13(2) ETA.…
- 1467 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
Lucy v. Zehmer joke and intoxication was not enough to get Zehmer out of a contract that Lucy took seriously. Offer Acceptance Offer creates a power of acceptance in the offeree so that she can bring the contract into existence. A counter offer will terminate/reject the original offer and create a new offer RS24 An offer is a manifestation of willingness to enter into a bargain, so made as to justify another person in understanding that his assent to that bargain is invited and will conclude it. Offer must convey a reasonable understanding that the offeror intends a contract and not merely a proposal to contract RS 40 face to face conversation when an offer is made the acceptances must occur before the close of the conversation and no contract is made unless there is an indication that the offer is intended to continue beyond the immediate circumstances When an offer terminates RS36 Silence/inaction cannot constitute acceptance Cannot reject and then accept that would be a counteroffer of sorts A counteroffer terminates an offer Offerors death or mental disability before acceptance terminates offer Offeror can revoke at any time before acceptance, unless there is an option to keep the offer open (notice required) Indirect revocation if the offeree finds out from 3rd party that the offer has been revoked (Dickenson v. Dodds after Dickenson found out Dodds sold the offered property to another he communicated his acceptance but was too late) RSC 42 Power of acceptance is terminated when offeree receives manifestation of intention not to enter into proposed contract RS 43…
- 10717 Words
- 26 Pages
Better Essays -
Issues: Under the “mail box rule”, does mail count as an authorized method of acceptance despite the fact of hand-delivery and no clear statement of acceptance method?…
- 348 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The requirements of an ‘acceptance’ to exist must be in the same terms of the offer. It cannot still be subject to a condition, such as where it was clear that Cameron had not intended to be bound until a formal contract was prepared and signed, Masters v Cameron (1954) 91 CLR 353. An acceptance must be made while the offer is still in existence. It must be made by a person whom the offer was addressed. If the offer is intended to be made to any person that learns of it then any such person can accept the offer on the stated terms. Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co (1893) 1 QB 256, where Carlill had read an advertisement offering a reward to anyone who caught influenza after buying the company’s smoke ball. Carlill bought the ball and caught influenza, since the offer was made to ‘the world at large’ it is capable to be accepted by anyone who learns of it, including Carlill. An acceptance must be made in…
- 1681 Words
- 7 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Derek sent the offer to buy some fabrics and expect the reply by express post next day that is a condition in the offer of Derek. Paul received the offer and he accepts, but the acceptance needs to apply the condition which is express post or a faster way than express post (telephone).otherwise Derek who make the offer can not know whether they are bound in offer or not. Paul reply to Derek by a letter of acceptance using slower method of communication that affects the agreement which made no agreement and no contract.…
- 404 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
acceptancea clear indication by the offeree to enter into a contract on the terms set out by the offeror…
- 11224 Words
- 45 Pages
Powerful Essays -
In order to discuss the accuracy of this statement we must first understand the concept of ‘acceptance’. The easiest way is to first study the definition of the word. ‘The action of consenting to receive or undertake something offered” (Google Translate). To accept in the terms of the law is defined as “Law Compliance by one party with the terms and conditions of another's offer so that a contract becomes legally binding between them. “ (The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition). Contract Law is the main area of the law that this statement is referring too. It is true that in order to have acceptance in a binding agreement both parties must be 100% clear in content of the contract and also what the circumstances are if the contract is broken in any way. However we must also state the agreement is not the sole factor in a Legally Enforceable. There must also be intention and consideration to allow the contract to become legally binding. In order to fully grasp this statement we must look at how contract law has developed from history to the present day and also to analyze the cases that have pushed these advancement or changes.…
- 500 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The essential requirement is that there be evidence that the parties had each from an objective perspective engaged in conduct manifesting their assent, and a contract will be formed when the parties have met such a requirement. It is argued that a contract requires for the parties to have a true meeting of the minds between the parties. A party could resist a claim of breach by proving that although it may have appeared objectively that he intended to be bound by the agreement, he had never truly intended to be bound. This is unsatisfactory, as the other parties have no means of knowing their counterparts' undisclosed intentions or understandings. They can only act upon what a party reveals objectively to be his intent. Hence, an actual…
- 507 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
4. In order for an acceptance to be valid it must be communicated to the offeror using proper method of communication. The mailbox rule is a timing rule in a contract acceptance that seals the deal upon mailing the acceptance if it is done properly.…
- 381 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The issue is whether C’s email reply constituted an offer. First it is to be established that a binding agreement has not formed. An agreement can be objectively established where there is mutual assent.6 In Masters v Cameron,7 it was noted that, ‘the case may be one in which the intention of the parties is not to make a concluded bargain at all, unless and until they execute a formal contract’. Such intention can be…
- 1979 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays