Preview

Oil Drilling in Alaska Wilderness

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oil Drilling in Alaska Wilderness
Oil Drilling in the Alaskan Wildlife Refuges
America Should Reject the Oil Businesses Plan and
Permanently Protect The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge

The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, comprising more than nineteen million acres in the northern corner of Alaska, is unique and one of the largest units of the National Wildlife system. The Arctic Refuge has long been recognized as an unparalleled place of natural beauty and ecological importance. The Arctic Refuge was established to conserve fish and wildlife populations and habitats in their natural diversity, as well as provide the opportunity for local residents to continue their subsistence way of life. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, which manages the Refuge, calls it "the only conservation system unit that protects, in an undisturbed condition, a complete spectrum of the arctic ecosystems in North America." (‘Alaska Wild ')
As early as the 1930 's, leading biologists and conservationists were captivated by the scenic beauty and wildlife diversity of Alaska 's northeastern Arctic. In the early 1950 's, a survey was conducted by the National Park Service to determine which Alaskan lands merited protection. This northeast corner was deemed, "the finest park prospect ever seen." After years of political battles and activism, supporters of the Arctic Refuge achieved victory. On December 6, 1960, during the Eisenhower Administration, Interior

Secretary Fred Seaton signed Public Land Order No. 2214. This order established the 8.9 million acre Arctic National Wildlife Range to protect the wildlife, wilderness and recreational values. This order closed the area to mineral entry. Twenty years later, Congress passed and President Jimmy Carter signed the Alaskan National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA). This more than doubled the original size to 19.8 million acres and established 8.6 million acres of the original area as wilderness (‘Alaska Wild ').
This



Cited: "Your Voice for Alaska 's Wilderness in the Nation 's Capital." Alaska Wilderness League. Online. Internet. 31 Oct. 2001. Available http://alaskawild.org "Oil Drilling in the Arctic Refuge, A New Look at Old Estimates." Alaska Wilderness League. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://alaskawild.org/oil_estimates.html "The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: The Next Chapter." Online. Internet. 5 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.cnie.org/nle/nrgen-23.html "Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, Alaska, Coastal Plain Resource Assessment." Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Development Issues. August 2001. Online. Internet. 5 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.csa.com/hottopics/ern/0laug/01aug18.html "Don 't Allow Big Oil to Drill in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge." Defenders of Wildlife. October 2001. Online. Internet. 25 Oct. 2001. Available http://www.defenders.org/wildlife/arctic/overview.html "Congress Will Take a Break, Will Return on November 26th." Audubon. 19 November 2001. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.protectthearctic.com "Organized Labor Opposes Drilling." State PIRGs ' Arctic Wilderness Campaign. 19 April 2002. Online. Internet. 20 April 2002. Available http://savethearctic.com/arctic.asp "Senate Rejects Arctic Refuge Drilling Amendment." U.S. PIRG Online Newsroom 18 April 2002. Online. Internet. 19 April 2002. Available http://uspirg.org/uspirgnewsroom.asp "America Should Reject Big Oil 's Tired Old Tune." Press Statement: The Wilderness Society. 28 September 2001. Online. Internet. 24 Nov. 2001. Available http://www.tws.org/newsroom/arctic_oil_092800.htm

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Dwight R Lee Analysis

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In his piece, Dwight R. Lee explains that with oil drilling the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, there would be many benefits as compared to the cost. He doesn’t deny that there would be risks associated with the drilling. However, he feels that they do not begin to compare to the benefits. He explains that the main reason that this has become such a hot topic is because of the high prices of gasoline and oil. One company that he looks at is the National Audubon Society. They are against opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to drilling because they feel that it will “destroy the integrity.” This is the same company that owns the 26,000 acre Rainey Wildlife Sanctuary and opens it to drilling. By allowing this drilling, the Audubon Society has received more than $25 million. This has allowed them to own other wildlife and wilderness land.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    DRILLING IN ANWR

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In order to fully understand why drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is such a big deal; we need to understand the history of the refuge. ANWR was created in 1980 by the United States Department of Interior. According to Scott Wallace of Smithsonian, federal legislators, at the time, set the land aside, not only to protect the United States’ large herd of caribou, but also for “possible future oil and gas development” (Wallace 52). Without a doubt, ANWR is valuable, both for its ecological uniqueness and its natural resources. ANWR’s wildlife is varied, and, according to Wallace (53), “dazzling.” In addition to hosting herds of caribou, he says, the refuge is home to polar bears, migratory birds, wolves, wolverines, musk ox, arctic foxes and snowy owls (Wallace 53). However, the oil beneath ANWR is also valuable.…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    For years there has been an environmental debate on whether oil drilling should begin in the largest refuge in the United States, Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]. High potential for oil within the refuge is estimated but the environmental impacts of oil drilling is harmful and destructive. Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge has pros and cons, however, cons are more significant as it deals with the environment and animals rather than politics and the economy. Pollution is a major consequence of oil drilling, oil spills are also a critical concern that would be devastating to the environment and the animals. Another major concern is climate change as an effect of pollution. The refuge provides a habitat in which…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * State in the United States-international boundary with Canada to the east, arctic ocean to the north…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Has anyone been to Alaska, or will plan a trip to Alaska? Well it’s a land of cold dark weather that doesn’t appeal to most, but Alaska has been a major topic to the government that affects me and you. The Alaska tundra has been in question to drill oil or to protect the precious environment there. Should the Alaska tundra be opened for oil drilling?…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the time we live in today we still struggle with the issue of wildlife conservation. Wildlife conservation is important, as animals can not speak for the selves and need us to create a voice for them. Former United States President Jimmy Carter has a strong opinion towards wildlife conservation shown in a foreword to Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land. In the foreword by Jimmy Carter, he uses effective rhetorical devices in his argument to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States should not drill for oil in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge because it would harm the environment, disrupt the animals, and destroy plants. The United States Congress created the Artic National Wildlife Refuge in 1980 (To drill or not to drill?: 6). The Artic National Wildlife Refuge is also known as ANWR (To drill or not to drill?: 6). The Artic National Wildlife Refuge is 19.6 million acres of wilderness (Scalzo, Jim Lo.: 37). Of the 19.6 million acres in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge 17.5 million acres are permanently closed to development. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is often called the "American Serengeti" (Defenders of Wildlife). The Artic National Wildlife Refuge lies in the northeast corner of Alaska (Predger, David). The entire refuge lies north of the Arctic Circle and 1,300 miles south of the North Pole (Predger, David). The Artic National Wildlife Refuge is the size of South Carolina (Predger, David). If ANWR was a state it would be bigger than ten other states (Predger, David). If the United States did drill for oil in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge there is an estimated 10.4 billion barrels on the North Slope (One state 's free lunch: 28-32). The North Slope covers 89,000 square miles (Experts say Alaska Oil Drilling Hurts Wildlife: 43). The North Slope extends from the top of the Brooks Range to the Artic coast (Experts say Alaska Oil Drilling Hurts Wildlife: 43). The United States Congress wants to drill for oil and natural gas in the Artic National Wildlife Refuge (Battles loom in…

    • 2442 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Arctic Wildlife Refuge

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Arctic Wildlife Refuge, in Jimmy Carter's opion " is one of America's last truly great wilderness". The former President uses his personal experiances to show why the Arctic Wildlife Refuge should be left be. Also he enacted legislation to help protect the wilderness from further development, with bipartisen support. Jimmy Carter want this area to be protected from industry destroying the natural beuaty, along with keeping around for future gernations to enjoy.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Domestic Oil Drilling

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Gertz, Emily. "Can Offshore Drilling Really Make the U.S. Oil Independent?: Scientific American." Scientific American. 12 Sept. 2008. Web. 06 Feb. 2012. <http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=can-offshore-drilling-make-us-independent>.…

    • 1695 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Alaska Oil Drilling

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Burger,Joel.“Adequate Science: Alaska’s Arctic Refuge: Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts and Applications.2nd Ed.Fred Vandyke. Springer.7 April. 2008.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    There’s something about the way trees form a thick canopy over a quiet forest that whispers of barely contained power. The wilderness seems to hold its breath and hide its secrets amidst the incursions of curious humans. However, the lucky few, such as former president Jimmy Carter, are made privy to the innermost workings of Mother Earth’s mysteries through their time in nature. Ink becomes paint, pages become canvases and Carter becomes an artist in his impassioned foreword to, ‘Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey’. In an effort to convince readers the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry, Carter utilizes powerful imagery…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The president opposing this idea from the last few years is Barack Obama. He thought that the drilling would permanently…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Although many definitions are available, the “Arctic” is everything North of the 60th parallel of northern latitude. Canada has three territories and several tips of other provinces which total 40% of Canadian landmass that fits the definition of the Arctic. In this landmass, an estimated population of more than 100,000 Canadians call it home. (The Canadian Arctic, 2013) This land and these people have needs and desires that are up to the government to see efficiently managed and regulated. Specialized aspects such as; The Environment, Economic Development, and Security are leading areas of concern. The following report will call attention to relevant government departments, Crown…

    • 1572 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays

Related Topics