Preview

Oliver Cromwell: Hero or Villain?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1796 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Oliver Cromwell: Hero or Villain?
There have been a lot of heroic figures throughout the history of world. They contributed their lives to their own nations, and sacrificed themselves as victims in order to achieve better goodness. Oliver Cromwell is one of those heroic figures who contributed his entire life to take back the tradition of England, which was deteriorated by King Charles I. Cromwell however isn't a typical hero- in actual facts many people wouldn't even consider him to be a hero at all. Cromwell is a controversial figure who still has people wondering. Even now in the new millennium, people are still contemplating his place in history- hero or villain? Cromwell proudly took his place in a documentary on the top ten best Britons, and ironically, also in the top ten worst Britons. In this essay I will assess whether these acts made him a hero or a villain, using contemporary views, quotes and other sources which give different interpretations.

"The days of Oliver Cromwell were marvellous days of freedom, prosperity, and peace." And so quoted a puritan Baptist in 1685, puritan believers as such felt that they had much more freedom under Cromwell's government. This quote is considered very biased as Cromwell (being a puritan himself) gave puritans greater freedom.

He was said to have wanted a greater religious tolerance in the country, therefore he let Jews live in England for the first time since 1290, and let Quakers hold their own religious ceremonies.

Another quote by a well-known name in history Samuel Pepys, who was a member of the government under the king Charles II in 1667 talks about Cromwell's superb and powerful leadership, "People look back on the days of Oliver Cromwell and praise him so. What brave things he did, and oh how the neighbouring princes did fear him." The fact that Pepys was a royalist is what makes this quote so interesting, as the association between them was far from friendly. So this just goes to prove the greatness of his leadership, and the braveness

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Oliver Cromwell: military leader of the Parliamentary side in the English Civil war, served as Lord Protector after the parliamentarians won.…

    • 1067 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When discussing heroes the first things that would come to mind are selfless individuals, they would show a tremendous amount of bravery in the face of certain defeat and have the courage and determination to beat overwhelming odds. The dictionary definitions of heroes are “a mythological or legendary figure often of divine descent endowed with great strength and ability” or “a man admired for his achievements and noble qualities”. Charles George Gordon has gone down in history as a an imperial hero, during this essay I will ascertain what it was Charles Gordon did to earn this title and whether or not it was justified.…

    • 1916 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    American history has traditionally considered loyalists as traitors and American patriots as heroes during American Revolutionary War. As the history had written, loyalists or “Tories” as their opponents called them, were traitors during American Revolutionary War. However, is it moral when American patriots called those people are traitors while they betrayed the people who first discovered America, which is the British? This essay will focus on connection between loyalist and traitor; the essay will first define the meaning of loyalist and traitor during American Revolutionary War and thereafter will compare a contrast with Joseph Brant and Benedict Arnold.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    "And what have we to oppose to them? Shall we try argument? Sir, we have been trying that for the last ten years. Have we anything new to offer upon the subject? Nothing. "(Henry, 89) Henry uses several rhetorical questions on the issues and uses a short answer to response them. It clearly shows that the action that they took before for getting freedom was useless under British's rude control. Last but not least, Henry emphasis the importance of freedom. "Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!" Henry ends his speech with this famous quote. He indicates that he'd rather die for his country than living without freedom. He repeats the importance of freedom and accentuates it in the last…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Puritans’ influence on New England was mainly political. As a Protestant group of people, they believed in a God, or a Supreme Being, and acknowledged Him as their superior. They also applied this to all other higher authorities by respecting those at a higher rank than their own. As stated in the Salem Covenant of 1636, “We do hereby promise to carry ourselves in all lawful obedience to those that are over us...” (Doc C) they promised to obey those with a higher authority. But, they made sure that one man did not have too much power or authority, because power can eventually lead to corruption. “... give mortal men no greater power than they are content they shall use -- for use it they will....give as much power as God in His word gives to men....” (Doc H) They followed God's’ word in allotting power to prevent corruption due to too much power. The Puritans also established an important principle still used today. That is, the principle of Religious Freedom, or of a Liberty of Conscience. One of their main reasons for coming to settle here was so they could have their own religious freedom, without any persecution from others. Roger Williams declared that “God requireth not a…

    • 692 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry not only used moral credibility, but also made me feel frustration. When Henry passionately states, “We have held the subject up in every light of which it is capable; but it has been all in vain” I immediately felt frustrated. When Henry used the words “in every light of which it is capable” I was irritated by the rejection of the colonists efforts. I had not realized the great effort us colonists had put into fighting for freedom, and that effort is not something that should be overlooked. The frustration began to fade away as he inspired me by his logic. When Henry was explaining our past efforts to gain freedom, he uses the wise words, “I know of no way of judging of the future but by the past” my mind started to turn. As a colony, we have constantly been threatened by the King’s actions, so what is different now? We are still under a tyrannical authority who abuses his power, and we must take a stand. Patrick Henry’s speech was inspiring, and persuaded me to put my life on the line to ensure freedom is upon our colony. Please do not worry too much about my sudden shift in…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Beowulf Vs Today

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beowulf's traits, good and bad, define him as a hero by Anglo-Saxon standards. But his arrogance, greed and selfishness contradict the modern, humanistic image of a hero. When it comes to Beowulf getting what he wants, nothing will stand between him and his goal. No amount of lives lost is too many for Beowulf, and the high cost to others only contributes to his glory. In his own time and culture, he was the ultimate hero of legend because he saved his people from monsters attacking them. But he falls far short when compared to today’s standards of selflessness, in which heroes are defined by risking their lives for others, and thus valuing their own less. Today’s heroes know that he may not make it out of the…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heroes are the game changers in society, who create the misfortune and accomplishment through their efforts. Throughout time, heroes have been represented in a variety of different ways. The Canterbury Tales and the Odyssey both portray their heroes far different than the other. In addition, heroes from the fifteenth century may be considered villains in today’s society. In conclusion, heroes are viewed in different ways because of perspective, the time period, and their self morals.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry had taken advantage of the Protestant Reformation to obtain power in the Church of England. While the English Reformation had practically banned the Catholic Church, it also stated that the king was the only leader of the church. Elizabeth I pushed for intense Catholicism and Puritanism in the English church. While in opposition of Elisabeth I, James I and Charles I moved the English church away from puritan ideals, Charles I. revoked the Puritan represented parliament, and Charles also enforced anti-puritan policies. The monarchy once had thought of puritans as a focal point in New England, but latter on they pushed away Puritanism and treated puritans harshly which had upset many of those puritans to make plans to immigrate to either the West Indies, America, or Europe (Roark,…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    An example of this being Rich’s style of leadership, Rich wanted money and fame, which can be shown when More told Rich about a job offering at a new school. In which Rich responds bitterly disappointed, expecting better. “More: Why not be a teacher? You’d be a fine teacher. Perhaps even a great one. Rich: And if I was, who would know it?” (Bolt 8) This shows that even though the job offered to him had excellent benefits, he did not want to accept it since he would get no recognition. Also, during More’s trial, it is made apparent that Rich was bribed to lie under oath. This can be shown when Rich enters in extravagant clothing and the reader is informed that Rich was appointed attorney-general for Wales. ( Bolt 154, 158) Which can also show that Rich would do anything for money and recognition. Another comparison that can be made to King Henry’s leadership is Cromwell’s leadership. Cromwell seemed to only follow what King Henry asked of him. Which can show that Cromwell was not an actual leader, but more of a follower to King Henry. As stated above, Cromwell supported the King thoroughly, enforced the King’s wishes, and did the King’s dirty work for him. “Cromwell: We’ll put something in the cupboard. Rich: What? Cromwell: Whatever’s necessary. The king wants either Sir Thomas More to bless his marriage or Sir Thomas More destroyed.” This shows that Cromwell would have done anything to please the King and fulfill his wishes, even if that meant having More killed. With the evidence provided, it can be determined that Cromwell led to ensure King Henry could succeed and Rich only led to gain money and power, while King Henry led to achieve what he desired and set out to achieve, and in the end, King Henry did achieve what he desired as he was able to divorce Catherine and marry…

    • 1314 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    viewed him as the heir to the English crown. The Presbyterian Scotts worried Cromwell, but the Catholic Irish fueled his next Puritan crusade. In his Declaration to the Irish Catholic Clergy, Cromwell writes, “You are part of Antichrist, whose Kingdom the Scriptures so expressly speaks should be laid in blood and ere it be long, you must all of you have blood to drink; even the dregs of the cup of the fury and wrath of God, which will be poured out unto you.” Cromwell’s historical infamy was born during his bloody battles in…

    • 95 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    A hero within his own mind Williams Shakespeare’s King Richard III grew up in the turbulent time of the latter years of the War of the Rose between years 1455-1485. Born in England in 1452, King Richard III was not famous and well known for his services to England as their King rather; he was best known for being accused of murdering his two nephews to protect his throne. Shakespeare portrayed Richard III as being a tyrannical ruler. Villains performs actual important role in a play. They the world biggest problem and are typically evil and compared to being bad or good. A villain is considered the hero's enemy since he is the evil person. There's no doubt that heroes play a range of important…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Robin Hood, one of history’s most popular fictional characters, continues to entertain and inspire people of all ages. Hood’s hawk-eyed archery and fierce swordplay make him popular with kids, and his social conscience endears him to old. With tales as early as the twelve hundreds, Robin Hood’s adventures have undoubtedly left their mark on history. Hood’s highly noted reputation of “robbing the rich to give to the poor” is remembered as fondly as his outlandish, green attire. Although a timeless tale with countless heroic deeds not all favor Robin Hood’s actions. Some view him as a roguish miscreant, a person rebelling against the law for his own selfish gains. Therefore, one question remains, does Robin Hood’s legacy portray him as an outlaw or hero?…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays