Preview

On Punishment And Teen Killers Summary

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
159 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
On Punishment And Teen Killers Summary
In the article “ On punishment and Teen killers” By Jennifer Jenkins talks about how this teenager has killed a Woman, when she was pregnant which she begged for the life of her unborn child but the teen was eager to feel how it would be to shoot someone and he right there shot her to death. Which now the teenager has been sentenced to three life sentences in prison.He is not the only one dealing with teenage killer crimes but there are about 1,300 cases nationally that have sentenced teenagers as an adult to life in prison.Therefore many people wish to lower down the offender's culpability just because of their age. In canada rarely any teens committed any crimes until 1980 were television had been introduced which affected teens.Many kids

Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary Of On Punishment And Teen Killers By Jennifer Jenkins
    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page

    Summary Of On Punishment And Teen Killers By Jennifer Jenkins

    On the other end of the spectrum in the article “ On Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins you can see a very weak use of the literary tool ethos. One example of this would be “ My youngest sister was the joy of our close family. When a teenager murdered her sister and her unborn child” this shows that she is obviously affected and uses strong Pathos in her writing. However it doesn't do anything to tell you on why we should believe her claim that kids who murder shouldn't be allowed any freedoms after they commit the horrible crime of taking someone's life. You can also see continously in her writing that she's citing facts that support her claim but, she shows no personal ethos which doesn't give the reader a good feel on if she…

    • 200 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Summary
    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Summary

    In the article “On Punishment and Teen Killers” ,written by Jennifer Jenkins is an article she wrote to inform people about what teenagers have done and to release her thoughts. Jennifer Jenkins is a high school teacher that has a devastating story for her own. Her sister, her brother in law, and her sister's unborn baby were killed by a teenager who just wanted to feel how it is to kill someone. As it seems this has changed her point of view for teenagers even though she was worked with teens all her life. The offender that she had to deal with was a serial killer in the making that also came from privilege. Every time that he got in trouble his parents fixed it and he did plan a lot worse crimes but after bragging to his friends he got caught.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study
    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Roper V. Simmons Case Study

    The court also discovered that juveniles under the age of seventeen are more likely to be rehabilitated in comparison to adults which is why juveniles should not be offered the death penalty. It was argued by the courts that most juveniles cannot be fully blamed for their actions due to being so undeveloped. It was also argued that juveniles are more likely not to be deterred from committing a crime by being threatened with the death penalty due to the lack of cognitive skills they have in comparison to…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Jenkins Analysis
    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Jenkins Analysis

    In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers” (2011), Jenkins uses the weakest ethos when she argues, teens who commit heinous crimes should receive life without the possibility of parole, and that victims’ rights should be considered. Jenkins is a high school teacher who was a victim. In the light, she works with teenagers which gives her a small amount of credibility, but on the contrary, her sister and unborn child were murdered by an adolescent. Be as it may, this gives her a biased opinion, because she wants revenge for her family members’ death and does not care about the person who killed her family members. In addition to that bad ethos, she uses a lot of pathos in her article which, not to mention, lowers her credibility. Consequently,…

    • 178 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    On Punishment And Teen Killers By Jennifer Jenkins
    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page

    On Punishment And Teen Killers By Jennifer Jenkins

    In the article, “On Punishment and Teen Killers”, Jennifer Jenkins claims that people feel bad for the teens that are getting life sentences for murdering someone, but there is no regard for the victims’ families. This article has the weakest ethos out of all of them. The author first develops her credibility when she quotes an expert named James Q. Wilson, Harvard Professor, and Crime Expert. This technique builds her credibility because her research is now coming from an expert, and this makes the readers trust her claim. Jenkins strengthens her credibility when she says, “As a high school teacher, I have worked lovingly with teens all my life…”(4). This example makes the readers feel like the author knows how teens work since she is a high…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Teen Killers Summary
    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Teen Killers Summary

    In article “On the Punishment and Teen Killers” by Jennifer Jenkins asserts information about teens serving life in prison. Jenkins first starts off the article by sharing her personal story and experience. Jenkins personal story connects with the topic on teen killers mostly because her sister was murdered by a teenager. Jenkins knows that it is hard to accept that a teen would do such a terrible crime like murder.Jenkins also states that brain develop wouldnt be the case of why they are committing terrible crimes such as murder because if that were then there would be an equal crime rates that involve teens around the world. Jenkins states that the media was misleading people with a photo stating that US is sending children…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Analysis
    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    On Punishment And Teen Killers Analysis

    These children who do change their life normally never have a problem with the law again. But others argue that some children are just “hopelessly defective”. In the article On Punishment and Teen Killers written by Jennifer jenkins she states that “The offender in our case was a serial killer in the making.He came from privilege.Whenever he got in trouble his parents fixed it.And after a series of other crimes he planned the murders for months” What she is trying to convey is that the children who commit these crimes are meticulous and evil and i'm not disagreeing with her because some children are like that but not all of them are. And for those individuals who are not like that they should be given the opportunity to redeem themselves and…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital Punishment And Teen Killers: Article Analysis
    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Capital Punishment And Teen Killers: Article Analysis

    If a child commits a serious crime like murder, robbery, or arson, should they go to jail? For some time now, supreme courts point out that some juveniles who commit crimes should not go to jail. Others would argue otherwise. Someone who views an act of crime as simply an act of crime would agree that a child who commits a crime would not be a child anymore. The Supreme Court defends the juveniles attempting to justify their actions as naïve like, and that sentencing them to a life sentence without parole is unconstitutional. I believe in the minority group that argues with Supreme Court justices on why they should be sentenced to prison for long periods of time.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Why Do Juveniles Deserve Life Sentencing
    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Do Juveniles Deserve Life Sentencing

    Typically, juveniles who display a propensity for committing crime will continue to do so, even as they get older. Their crimes may even become more serious in nature. Therefore, teens that commit heinous crimes should be punished for their obnoxious behavior. In “Juvenile Doesn’t Deserve Life Sentences” by Gail Garinger, he states that “a juvenile doesn’t deserve life in prison because most teens haven’t reached their full maturity”.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Analysis Of On Punishment And Teen Killers
    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analysis Of On Punishment And Teen Killers

    On June 25, 2012, the Supreme Court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison. A few justices believed life in prison without parole for a juvenile prevents consideration for their chronological age and its features. But four justices disagreed saying that heinous crimes committed by juveniles should be punished with a sentence of life in prison, or a 17-year-old would be released to society after he had gun down his fellow classmates and teachers. I disagree with the Supreme Court ruling. I believe that every juvenile who has committed a heinous crime should be sentenced to life in prison without parole. The victims of the crime would get the justice they deserve, they are at the age where they should know what they are doing, and brain development does not play a fact to juveniles committing heinous crimes .…

    • 865 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eassy
    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Eassy

    Adolescence and the death penalty, two words more commonly seen together as of late. With growing number of young adult being tried and sentenced as adults for violent crimes the question rises why did they commit does age matter to the jury when they are put on trial?…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles and the Death Penalty
    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Juveniles and the Death Penalty

    The juvenile justice system has been in existence for over 100 years. The main objective of the juvenile justice system is to rehabilitate the child, not to enforce excessive punishment. The system involves children under the age of eighteen years old. There is a line between juveniles and adult offenders. Just because the offender is under the age of eighteen, does that make him or her incapable of being charged for a crime and be convicted just like an adult? This question comes to mind when a child commits a crime such as murder. Should a child be convicted and suffer the same consequences as an adult? Or should the system just accept the fact that the child does not know any better and release them? From a moral standpoint, it would not be fair to subject a child to the death penalty but it seems like the justice system outweighs many moral standpoints.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles Unfit for Trial
    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Juveniles Unfit for Trial

    Juvenile crime is very wide spread within our country. Juveniles commit crimes every day; whether it’s stealing candy from a store or stealing a life. Those who commit such heinous acts such as taking someone’s life should be sentenced to life in prison or in some cases, death. But the question still stands: what if it is an adolescent who murdered somebody, should they be sentenced to life in prison or even sentenced to walk death row? I believe that juveniles should not receive life in prison but rather an evaluation on their mental health to see why they acted in such a way.…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Is It Important For Juveniles Go To Murder Essay
    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why Is It Important For Juveniles Go To Murder Essay

    Statistics shows that juveniles that commit first degree murder get life in prison without parole. Our supreme court ruled that juveniles who committed murder could not be sentenced to life in prison because it violates the eighth Amendment “ ban on cruel or unusual punishment .” Juveniles are still young, there is still a chance to make them better people by rehabilitation . So minors still have the opportunity to contribute to society even though, they have made poor decisions in the past. Nothing ever justifies death no matter the circumstances or situation you are in. The U.S supreme court should not rule mandatory life in prison for juveniles who have committed murder.…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Juveniles Should Face Life In Prison
    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Juveniles Should Face Life In Prison

    After considering both sides of the juvenile justice system, it is clear that juveniles should face life in prison. If I were to commit a crime at 17 years old I would expect to be punished the same way as an adult who committed the same crime. I am old enough to know what I am doing and shouldn't get any special treatment regardless of my age. Adolescents who are willing to commit crimes in the first place know it will come with consequences. We all have the same brain and nothing different, it's the way others choose to use it that makes a difference.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics