The author of this review, Philip Stieg, is a neurosurgeon-in-chief of New York-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center. He has expertise in skull-base surgery and is a known published author as well as an international lecturer. He sees first hand the violence that takes place during the NFL games because he is a neuro-trauma consultant that stands on the sidelines of games. This article discovers the story of concussion incidents in the NFL over the past four decades. It gives an in depth background of the case of Mike Webster, former center for the Steelers. His death in 2002 was found to be linked to chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), making him the first professional football player with a case of this kind. Stieg then goes on to…
One reason that the one-child policy was an excellent idea is that the population was decreasing. Document A shows a steady population decline from 1980-2010 this will continue until 2030. Also, the policy has prevented a humongous birth rate and leaves more food and resources for the population (Document E). This evidence supports the claim that the one-child policy is helping China’s…
Put yourself in other people’s shoes. The year is 1980. You just had your 2nd child. You are so excited to see your daughter/son go to school for the very first time, but wait. Everyone is talking about something called “China’s One Child Policy”. You are confused until you find out what it means. The 2nd child that you just had, can’t receive barely any benefits. According to (Document E), “The Costs and who is not allowed to enroll in school or to access the healthcare system.”. Isn’t that just terrible? If your child has something life-threatening wrong with he/she, he/she cannot treat it because of them being the 2nd child. Your child could die because of this policy. Just think about that.…
One reason that the one child policy was a bad idea is because it was unnecessary. A chart shows that China’s fertility rate in 1979 was 2.7 and it decreased down to 1.7 in 2008(Doc B).This evidence supports the claim that the one-child policy was a bad policy because the decline was already in progress.…
Could you imagine your leader making up rules about your family? It seems impossible and inhumane, but this is exactly what they are doing in China. China implemented a “one child policy” in the late 1970s in response to a growing crisis created by rapidly exploding population growth (Piper). Essentially the one child policy is not a law but enforced with punishments. This policy allows families to only have one child. Of course in every policy comes something good and something bad.…
Ever wonder if the one-child policy worked out in china? China's population was increasing too fast, almost to one billion. The communist party feared china's population and created a policy named The One-Child Policy that started in 1980. Now we discuss if this policy was a good idea for china or not. More evidence has been found in the documents about this policy not being a great idea afterall. The population still has been growing because of exceptions. Female babies have been killed because at the time a male babies were wanted more than a female baby. Also, some children without a sibling show social issues with parents. More evidence will be stated on why the One-Child policy was not effective.…
In 1949, Mao Zedong governed China from nineteen forty nine to nineteen seventy six. Chinas population was poor at the time and the government was running out of ways to help chinas economy fix itself. China was in a dire need for a change. So Mao decided that he would encourage families to have more and more children. His logic was that the more people birthed would mean more workers to work on farms, ensuing a stronger China. He wanted China to thrive and surpass the richer nations. Mao did not realize this at the time but China was about to become one of the most overpopulated countries to exist. After he helped China get on its feet he decided to make a drastic change called the Great Leap Forward. The goal of the Great Leap Forward was to change China from a lush traditional country to a hard, steel producing nation. This recoiled on him and his people started starving because China was not importing enough food to support the growing population, causing thirty million deaths. He needed to fix this problem and fast. His solution was to slow down the growing birth rate with the slogan “Late, long, and few.” The idea behind the slogan was for couples to marry late and have few children. After this, the fertility rate in China was cut in half in only nine years. This decrease in fertility rate did not settle well with the government so the Chinese government implemented the -one-child policy to further decrease the fertility rate. The one-child policy was a policy that banned the Han Chinese, which makes up 90% of Chinas population, from having more than one child. (Background Essay.) Despite the harsh measures it took to put the one-child policy in place, research has shown that the policy has boosted the self esteem of children and saved the environment by increasing the water amount per capita.…
Some of the procedures that have changed is now if the first child born is a female a second child is allowed for consideration but must be approved by the government. Also, the orphanages have become safer since there is an increase in Chinese adoptions from other countries the United States being one of them. Economic resources have also improved allowing for the growth of China to not be as detrimental as it was when the policy was first created. The growth in elderly exceeds the overall population which is an issue for trying to repopulate China. Fertility rates will decrease due to all the implements of the policy creating a new issue for the Chinese Population. Another issue is the gender displacement there are too many males and since…
In today’s society, China’s population was put into consideration by their government. They decided that each couple were to have only one child each. This was established as the one-child policy. Both situations were initiated to maintain their population. Also, it is stated that some families did not obey this regulation and had more than one child.…
Imagine a world where one can’t just simply go to the supermarket because there is not enough food. A world where pollution is a daily reality, the air too thick to even breath and the water virtually undrinkable. A place you can no longer buy consumer goods because there isn’t enough materials to make them. This could become a reality, but preventing it has always been on the minds of the Chinese government. War and epidemics had struck China for years, but after the founding of the People's Republic of China, sanitation and medicine improved and prompted rapid population growth. This combined with the movement created by Mao Zedong, China’s previous communist leader, led to rapid population growth that gave China’s monumental population. This monumental mistake took its toll in the food supply when Mao emphasized steel production over farming, food supply slipped behind population growth; by 1962 a massive famine had caused some 30 million deaths. After the population leveled off, the government continued the camping to reduce China’s population. In 1979 the Chinese government introduced a policy requiring couples from China's ethnic Han majority to have only one child. Depending on where they lived parents can be fined thousand of dollars for having an extra child without a permit and can be forced to abort the child and then be sterilized. With all this in mind I not only believe that the one child policy with some adjustments can be a good solution to the overpopulation and issues related to it but also it is a necessary policy. With changes to the policy will greatly improve China’s people living environment and standards. Without this policy we can face serious issues concerning food supplies, depletion of natural resources at a rapid rate, poverty,spreading of diseases due to lack of proper medical care, overcrowded cities that can lead to heavy pollution, inadequate housing, lower life expectancy and higher death rates,…
The 4-2-1 problem refers to an only child in a family who must bear the burden of being responsible for supporting two parents and four grandparents without any support from other siblings. With advancements in technology and better healthcare, by 2050 more than a quarter of China’s population will be over the age of sixty-five (Dvorsky, 2012). By 2040, China’s percentage of elderly people over the age of sixty-five is projected jump to 28% from the previous mark of 12% in 2010, according to the UN. With the mortality rate rising in China, another problem going along with the 4-2-1 problem arises. For example, “Given the current mortality schedule, the likelihood that an 80-year-old Chinese man will see his 55-year-old son die before he does is six percent, and the likelihood an eighty year old woman will outlive her 55-year-old son is seventeen percent, as women live longer” (Wang, 2010). Which means, Chinese parents cannot count on their children to support them when they reach old age as much as they were able to in previous…
The Every Child Matters Policy (DfES 2003, 2004a, 2004b) has according to Arthur, Grainger and Wray (2006) 'served to set educational inclusion within the broader context of radical change in the whole system of children's services including explicitly shifting from intervention to prevention with services working together more effectively'. The overall aim of Every Child Matters is to reduce the number of children who experience educational failure, engage in offending or antisocial behaviour, suffer from ill health or become teenage parents (DfES 2003). The Every Child Matters aims are said to be at the heart of Children Act 2004 (Arthur, Grainger and Wray 2006). Finally, according to Overall and Sangster (2007) the idea of an inclusive school is one that will meet the needs of many pupils in a variety of ways; within special classes, through support for individuals, differentiation in the curriculum and carefully thought through teaching, is an exciting idea.…
I believe that the one child policy was a bummer. It was no use at all; except making families apart. I even heard that China's population would go down even without the one child policy.…
As a result, the governments from these countries have been using large portion of their budget to cater for the old population through pensions and also medical support (Goldsmith& Larson, 2003). With the family sizes also reduced, responsibilities of these aged people are being delegated to the few family members who were born and as a result instead of these people engaging in national building activities, they spend most of their time taking care of the elderly whereas with a high population, responsibilities could have been divided easily among the many siblings. Another economic effect of a controlled family size is the fact that, with a controlled population, almost every citizen is likely to read up to the maximum level of education and as a result, industries would miss the much needed cheap labor which they need to run their companies cheaply. This could force these industries either to use much money to run the companies, close down if they cannot afford the operating costs or even relocate to other countries where labor is cheap. As a result, this would deny the government much of its needed revenues…
The one child policy in 1979 in an attempt to slow the rapidly growing population, initiated by Chinese officials has led to a multitude of uncalculated and sudden catastrophic impingements. These impingements have had, and will continue to have, large scale effects on China’s population. The Chinese government has begun to feel the recoil of their one child policy after the discovery was made that there is an approximant 120 to 100 ratio of males to females in China. This was a crucial discovery for the Chinese officials investigating the other unintended effects of the implantation of the one child policy. The one child policy has been linked to an increase in: human trafficking, birth tourism, social disabilities, crime, and single men.…