In the beginning of the article, Carr writes that after he gets used to surfing the Net, he finds it is hard for him to concentrate on reading as long as he used to do (589). Beginning the paragraph with this personal experience, Carr not only brings up his argument that the Internet weakens people’s capacity for deep reading and concentration, but also he makes his audience reflect on their own related experience to understand his argument. The anecdotes help Carr set up a sitting for its audience to follow his logic better. After leading the audience to the setting and states his arguments, he introduces a research study conducted by scholars from UCL. The research shows that people exhibit “a form of skimming activity” and avoid reading long passage online (590). The research result also indicates that “there are signs that new forms of ‘reading’ are emerging”. By introducing the research, Carr intends to show that his argument is rooted from factual studies. As a result, when he summarizes the research finding on the emergence of a new reading pattern caused by the Internet, Carr verifies his argument that the way in which he reads and thinks deeply is changing because of the…
In "Is Google Making Us Stupid?" Nicholas Carr argues his deep concern on the use of the Internet and how it is affecting our brains. Carr feels like he has built upon the habit of skimming through articles for research. As a frequent user he has built such a strong habit of this that he can now no longer have the patience to sit down and read an actual book. For it lacks the instant gratification he is so used to getting from the Internet: "What the net seems to be doing is chipping away from my capacity for concentration and contemplation," Carr confesses. The Internet is changing the way its user’s minds process information. People are losing concentration easier than before and instead of truly reading material, they are skimming and mentally…
We cannot deny that to read in a traditional way is reading in a more concentrated and slower pace which could provide us more space to think deeply, even from our own experience. As what Carr writes in the article that Taylorism has turned the factory workers into little more than automatons (Carr, 593), the Internet is now turning us into a kind of automatons, “information robots”, as well. From day to day as we surf the Internet, we actually read a lot and are able to obtain all sorts of information. Nevertheless, out of their own business interests, the commercial Internet companies try to push us to click as many links as we can and view as many pages as we can during the time we spend on the Internet, instead of encouraging “leisurely reading or slow, concentrated thought” (Carr, 595). As a result, after years, although more and more people are able to enjoy the convenient and affordable Internet connection, those commercial Internet companies have successfully trained more and more people to follow their rules and become their means of making profit unconsciously. Following their rules, we are used to flick through all the materials and gradually lose our ability to read concentratedly. However, as the ones who possess human intelligence, we need…
He mentions that by quoting the thoughts of a scientist that says “Wolf worries that the style of reading promoted by the Net, a style that puts “efficiency” and “immediacy” above all else, may be weakening our capacity for deep reading.” (2) Carr mentions the “deep immersion” type of thinking when he use to read and say that since he has started to use the internet he can’t do that anymore, his brain just wants to skim over the reading. He states “Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three pages. I get fidgety, lose the thread, and begin looking for something else to do.”(2) Carr blames this on the constant skimming he has done over a long period of time on the internet. Carrs’ article thoroughly explains his views on how people are starting to rely on the internet more and not reading which in turn will affect their ability to read in the long…
The Internet is making it harder for us to concentrate and become engrossed in the information that we are trying to read. Carr explains how sinking into the depths of an article or getting caught up in the narrative of a book is becoming more and more difficult. “ Immersing myself in a book or a lengthy article used to be easy “ (735) Carr tells us. “ Now my concentration often starts to drift after two or three…
In his essay “Is google making us stupid” Nicholas Carr explains how the internet has helped us to gather vast amounts of information very quick, but also how it has affected our attention span when the time comes to read long pieces of texts. Carr also feels that our brains are constantly getting rewired due to the amount of time we spend online has caused him to lose concentration when he is reading. Besides, make it easier to find information and rewiring our brains the internet has changed the way we comprehend what we are reading. Carr states that before the internet he could easily get caught in the argument of what he was reading and that he no longer does it because his concentration starts to drift away after reading a couple of pages.…
The Way We Read is Changing The Internet can be a great educational tool, providing a world of information at your fingertips very quickly. Getting information, for a research project in the past could take days of reading books and journals. Reading books has become almost obsolete. The attention span of a person reading a book is that of a goldfish, two seconds.…
Many people argue that internet is making us smarter, due to the fact that it has given us an easier access to look for information on any topics within seconds, however the internet is filled with unreliable sources and information. Especially on certain websites, like Wikipedia which allows everyone to edit it, which might cause false information to spread around. Another aspect is that internet has made instantaneous communication worldwide a common thing, allowing intercultural experience that was once impossible to succeed. However, social media has created huge distraction to teenagers who often browse through their Facebook, twitter accounts in class and elsewhere. As a matter of fact, internet is making us less attentive and intelligent, as people’s ability to read and write aggravate, moreover, we are constantly distracted by the tremendous amounts of information on the internet, which leads to loss of concentration and memory.…
Google is making us smarter as we re-discover new ways to learn. In "Is Google Making Us Supid?” Nicholas Carr argues his profound concern on the use of the Internet and how it is affecting our brains. Carr 's main argument is that the Internet may well have damaging effects on cognition while reading; that would diminish the ability for concentration and contemplation. Carr strongly believes that the problem with the Internet is how it pushes us towards browsing information rather than digging in more deeply and considering it.…
Wolf (April, 2013) says, "There is physicality in reading, maybe even more than we want to think about as we lurch into digital reading—as we move forward perhaps with too little reflection. I would like to preserve the absolute best of older forms, but know when to use the new." Even though there may be physicality in reading a book, the changes that have been made with technology has also improved the speed we do business and by improving the speed of conducting business which brings a better economy and more jobs to keep up with the pace. Being digital will also gain the interest of more desirable ways to improve the technology we have today, by increasing productivity and convenience. Imagine a time where everything is built in and you no longer have to be holding devices nor books to read stories or gain knowledge by looking through information. What if we had everything programmed into our minds from the…
Nearing the end of the piece, Carr concludes that the internet and conventional reading may be two separate entities. Whether it be positive or negative, there is a distinctive difference in comprehension. Referring to traditional text he says, “The kind of deep reading that a sequence of printed pages promotes is valuable not just for the knowledge we acquire from the author’s words but for the intellectual vibrations those words set off within our own minds” (Carr 580). Diving into a book or lengthy text requires the readers full focus to gain the required information. The way that many have been reading has changed to a far more superficial level. Now, reading is a vessel to gain quick insight, not a fully comprehensive…
With the increased use of the Internet in people’s lives, a person cannot help but to feel a shift in the way he or she processes information so that the passages he or she reads are given cursory attention for the sake of efficiency. There are many consequences to this type of thinking. For instance, as Nicholas Carr, the writer of “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,” states, readers are more likely to put speed and practicality above forming connections within the text, which “may be weakening [their] capacity for the kind of deep reading that emerged when an earlier technology, the printing press, made long and complex works of prose commonplace” (Carr 229). As unlikely as it seems, the way people read affects how they think. In the case of the Internet, the increase in information has shaped people to become shallow thinkers.…
"Is Google Making Us Stupid?" by Nicholas Carr illustrates to me that the internet is slowing down the development of our brain. I agree with his argument that technology has affected out attention span, he sets an example of how we now cannot concentrate on the readings, Scott Karp, and Bruce Friedman, both agree that their ability to read long articles has been affected by the web. Also, I agree with Carr that we are becoming low thinking people because the internet gives us easy access to have quick information research. However, I think that Google and the internet are actually helping us to learn new information. It is because when the computers are not here, we do all things by hand. If you want to know what a word means, you would need to get a dictionary. If you want to look up something that your teacher mentioned in class, but you don't know what it is, or how does it look like. Then, you would have to find the encyclopedia to look for it. In nowadays, we do everything by computer, communicate with people, blogging, searching, watch videos, etc. We can learn new information quickly by searching from the internet. As Carr said, "It [the Net] injects the medium’s content with hyperlinks, blinking ads, and other digital gewgaws, and it surrounds the content with the content of all the other media it has absorbed. A new e-mail message, for instance, may announce its arrival as we’re glancing over the latest headlines at a newspaper’s site" (Carr 62). They take away our concentration, when we are reading an article there are lots of ads, hyperlinks, which would take our attentions. Thus, we will go to another website and look for other stuffs.…
In Nicholas Carr’s essay, Is Google Making Us Stupid, he states, “research that once required days in the stacks or periodical room of libraries can now be done in minutes” (732). The use of technology is very beneficial and time efficient, however does the pros overcome the cons? Carr also discusses the fight against technology to stay focus; since now a day, “…three or four paragraphs is too much to absorb” (733). I reckoned that we must realize that reading doesn’t come natural like speech does. We must keep training ourselves to read no matter if it’s in a paperback book or an online blogging site without…
Some might have said that Google invent new innovative ways to learn. In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr’s that the internet is a threat to our brains, but there is no evidence of such cause. I found that the internet is a tool when it comes to reading, studying, and anything that I am able to find on the internet. We are in a world that enable us to learn much than in a book could which might lead to believe that technology can improve teaching and learning, but there still some continue to insist in traditional reading or writing. For example, the baby Boomer generation might be more resistant to rapid technology changes and prefer to pick a book instead figuring out how or what technology could improve one reading or writing which a lot generation X prefer to do. We have to integrate both generations to find median ground to understand digital application can improve teaching and learning due to why literacy matter. We need to able to guide the…