Preview

Open/Closed Source

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
903 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Open/Closed Source
“Open/Closed Source”
Steven Arbizo
University of Phoenix
POS/355
INTRODUCTION TO OPERATING SYSTEMS
THOMAS KRAWCZYK
03/23/2013

Over the past twenty or so years, there has been a never ending debate within the computing social realms, on whether software operating systems should be developed as open source or whether private companies should keep their source code closed from users of the software. This paper will define open source and closed source software models. In addition, a comparison between open source and closed source operating systems will be examined. Finally, examples of each type of operating system will be given.
Closed source software is designed and developed by either a private company or person. Only the final executable product is released to its customers. The source code is essentially locked away and restricted from being viewed, modified, and re-distributed by anyone not having any ownership or licensing rights to the software. These types of applications are copy right or protected as intellectual property.
Open source software on the other hand, enables the end users the ability to utilize the software, the right to view, modify, and distribute the source code as long as the original developers are given their due credit.
The main benefit to producing closed source software is to make money, and to create a business of developing software that can only be redistributed with the purchase of a license to do so. In addition, the companies or individuals who develop the source code, have complete control over the inner workings of the software.
Open source software, on the other hand, has a much broader explanation for its foundation. Many developers see open source as a way to contribute and make a difference. Others support open source so as not to rely on any single person or company for their software needs. Still, others see it as a way to compete against certain companies who may want to monopolize the industry.
As stated



References: Dasgupta P.(2005) Open Source Closed Source Retrieved from http://cactus.eas.asu.edu/partha/columns/05-28-OpenSource.htm Grant A. (2004) Open Source vs. Closed Source Retrieved from http://www.scienceinafrica.co.za/2004/january/software.htmLinux Retrieved March 21, 2013 from Wikipedia: (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux Open Source Retrieved March 21, 2013 from Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_source

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Unit 1 Chapter Exercise

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Free software is code that is available for free to everyone. It is free to be studied, redistributed, and modified.…

    • 649 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Customization: Open source software is designed for developers to adapt and extend. Whereas, users usually cannot make non-cosmetic changes to a proprietary system.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FOSS (Free and Open Source Software) had some trouble in 2006 when Microsoft submitted 235 patents that were allegedly violated by FOSS. Microsoft created these patents in order to collect royalties from companies in the “free world” (companies/people using free software). Eben Moglen of the Free Software Foundation contended that software is a mathematical algorithm and is not patentable. Moglen wrote, “It’s a tinderbox. As the commercial confrontation between free software and software-that’s-a-product becomes more fierce, patent law’s going to be the terrain on which a big piece of the war’s going to be fought.” FOSS has powerful corporate patrons and allies. So if Microsoft ever tried to sue Linux distributor Red Hat for patent infringement, for instance, OIN might sue Microsoft in retaliation, trying to enjoin distribution of Windows.…

    • 705 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CMGT 555 Week 5 DQs

    • 422 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This work of CMGT 555 Week 5 Discussion Questions shows the solutions to the following problems: DQ 1: Identify advantages and risks associated with open source software.…

    • 422 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open standards are designed to create a fair market over which no one can take advantage over or monopolize. These standards are applied across all companies so that all devices are compatible with each other by a minimum standard. This allows a situation such as an OS X computer to access a website run by Linux-based web server. Open standards at the heart encourage interoperability, competition, and innovation, rather than restricted nature of proprietary standards.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    linux unit1 assignment1

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Answer: Free software is software that users have the freedom to distribute and change. The three main characteristics of free software are: The source code has to be distributed with the program, you cannot restrict people from redistributing/modifying/using the software, and users must be allowed to redistribute modified versions under the same terms/licensing.…

    • 825 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Final Study Guide

    • 2229 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Which of the following is a difference between security vulnerabilities associated with open sources software and proprietary…

    • 2229 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ShortAnswer

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Specifications for hardware or software that are developed by a standards organization or a consortium involved in supporting a standard. Available to the public for developing compliant products, open standards imply "open systems;" that an existing component in a system can be replaced with that of another vendor. Although many vendors may have contributed to an open standard, and one may have contributed more than others and even have great influence, an open standard is not completely controlled by a single vendor.…

    • 544 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 1 assignment 1

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Three main characteristics of free software are: When you distribute the source code, you must also distribute same license with the code, you cannot restrict people from redistributing/modifying/using the software, and users must be allowed to redistribute modified versions under the same terms/licensing.…

    • 405 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. The difference between intellectual commons and community and the free software community is that the free software community makes something for the whole community to download and use. The intellectual commons can add and use the source code from the program that the free software community made, but the intellectual commons has to give credit to the free software community.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If you think of the ideas of open source applied to information in an encyclopedia, you get to Wikipedia - lots and lots of small contributions that bubble up to something that's meaningful.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Open vs Closed Sources

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First let’s start by defining the terms open and closed source. According to Britannica online encyclopedia Open source is defined as an “Unrestricted (Open) sharing of Information” (Britannica). This means the source code of software is open and available to the public. Anyone can view and modify it to enhance its performance. This is greatly an advantage for open source software because programmers all around the world have access to it. This means that they can enhance the program at a faster rate do to it availability. Examples of an open source are, Apache HTTP Server http://httpd.apache.org/ (Web Server), Mozilla http://www.mozilla.org/ (web browser and email client). The most known open source software is known as Linux. A closed source is defined as “proprietary software development and only the object code is published” (Britannica). Many restrictions are put on a closed source. The source code is kept secret to the public. Only the programmers that have access to the software can make modifications to the software. This is a disadvantage for people because anyone buying their program is stuck with what they get. People are at the feet of the companies providing the software. Examples of closed source software include Lime Wire, Norton Antivirus, and the most know Microsoft Windows.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Software Should Be Free

    • 6637 Words
    • 27 Pages

    The existence of software inevitably raises the question of how decisions about its use should be made. For example, suppose one individual who has a copy of a program meets another who would like a copy. It is possible for them to copy the program; who should decide whether this is done? The individuals involved? Or another party, called the ``owner''? Software developers typically consider these questions on the assumption that the criterion for the answer is to maximize developers' profits. The political power of business has led to the government adoption of both this criterion and the answer proposed by the developers: that the program has an owner, typically a corporation associated with its development. I would like to consider the same question using a different criterion: the prosperity and freedom of the public in general. This answer cannot be decided by current law--the law should conform to ethics, not the other way around. Nor does current practice decide this question, although it may suggest possible answers. The only way to judge is to see who is helped and who is hurt by recognizing owners of software, why, and how much. In other words, we should perform a cost-benefit analysis on behalf of society as a whole, taking account of individual freedom as well as production of material goods. In this essay, I will describe the effects of having owners, and show that the results are detrimental. My conclusion is that programmers have the duty to encourage others to share, redistribute, study, and improve the software we write: in other words, to write ``free'' software.(1)…

    • 6637 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The GNU General Public License has served a major role in the way people think of programs today. The GNU, or simply GPL is originally written by Richard Stallman of the Free Software Foundation (FSF). The case is, most software’s don’t want you to share or change the program. This means that they are trying to take away freedoms of having the program. What the GNU General Public License is designed to do is the opposite of that because it offers freedom to share and change the software and to make sure it is free for all of its users.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Open source is a term that allows individuals or end-user to modify software or programs for the purpose of study, use, copy, or share its source code. This concept applies to operating system such as GNU. GNU is a Unix-like operating system that is free software – it respects your freedom. The name “GNU” is a recursive acronym for “GNU’s Not Unix!” (GNU Operating System, 2013). It is a completely free software system that is upward-compatible with Unix (GNU Operating System, 2013). The GPL also known as The GNU General Public License or GUN GPL for short was created by Richard Stallman serves as the de facto constitution for the Free Software movement (The History of the GPL, 2001).…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays