could pursue an aggressive economic expansionist policy without military force. It was clear that the U.S. did not have the same advantages as the imperialistic countries did since they had not obtained a sphere of influence in China (SOURCE 6). The Open Door policy would negate this by granting all countries equal access to trade with China. This did increase U.S. trade with China while maintaining its opposition against imperialism. The U.S. did not want to be an imperial country because it went against their republican beliefs. William Appleman Williams, a prominent revisionist historian in the 20th century stated that “it emerged as one of the most enduring interpretive concepts in the study of U.S. foreign relations,” because it set an example of how the U.S. could successfully intervene in other countries affairs and benefit economically by cooperating with other countries instead of invading (SOURCE 7). The U.S.’s proposal promoted free trade under its high-minded principals that supposedly boosted interests of all nations. With this reasoning it gave leeway for the U.S. to justify its political, economic, and military actions in the
could pursue an aggressive economic expansionist policy without military force. It was clear that the U.S. did not have the same advantages as the imperialistic countries did since they had not obtained a sphere of influence in China (SOURCE 6). The Open Door policy would negate this by granting all countries equal access to trade with China. This did increase U.S. trade with China while maintaining its opposition against imperialism. The U.S. did not want to be an imperial country because it went against their republican beliefs. William Appleman Williams, a prominent revisionist historian in the 20th century stated that “it emerged as one of the most enduring interpretive concepts in the study of U.S. foreign relations,” because it set an example of how the U.S. could successfully intervene in other countries affairs and benefit economically by cooperating with other countries instead of invading (SOURCE 7). The U.S.’s proposal promoted free trade under its high-minded principals that supposedly boosted interests of all nations. With this reasoning it gave leeway for the U.S. to justify its political, economic, and military actions in the