Trying to combat this vehicle dominance naturally leads to inequalities between drivers and pedestrians. This is no more apparent than when we consider the everyday material objects located on the street. Rodney Berman explains how the high number of tall bollards are there to stop motorists driving onto, or parking on the pavement, how the islands have been put in the middle of the road, as well as controlled crossings, to help make it easier for pedestrians to cross, and how there are parts of the road painted red to stop motorists driving into certain areas (Material lives, 2009, scene 1). These examples show how social resources are distributed in favour of one social group over another, in this case to impose more control over the vehicles and therefore provide the pedestrians with more safety and…
People do things according to their character, if someone always disobey the road rules and don’t get caught, then they think it’s the right thing. However, someone who takes the rules of the road serious they would not think of even running a stop sign.…
Author John Staddon, who has spent his "professional life studying adaptive behavior-how changes in the environment lead to changes in the ways humans act" (Staddon 307), and much time in both the U.K and the U.S, has noticed a disturbing fact about the American roadways. "often when I return to the U.S., I see a fender bender or two within a few days. Yet I almost never see accidents in the U.K." " ...I begin to think that the American System of traffic control, with its many signs and stops, and with its specific miles tailored to every bend in the road, has had the unintended consequence of causing more accidents than it prevents."(Staddon 306). Research and years of observation by Staddon in both the U.K and the U.S, show that when driver 's spend so much of their time and attention seeking out all the signs on the roads in the U.S., they…
It is noted that it is a 'sharp clear night' and a street as big as Sauchiehall Street should be well lit but still the drivers pass by and ignore what they see. It has been said that 'there's no such thing as an innocent bystander'; I think that this is what Edwin Morgan is trying to point out to us. He is reflecting on how more people in this 'high-tech' age are forgetting that there are people around them that feel the same things that they do. A lot of people live one-track lives and do not look to either side to help others; just like the drivers who 'keep their eyes on the road' and refuse to look to the pavement and help the young people who are so obviously in trouble. I feel sorry for the couple, anger towards the youths and annoyance with the two drivers.…
This type of hostility is not arranged and frequently happens without giving it much thought. At the point when another auto cuts you off in movement and you start hollering and criticizing the other driver, you are encountering incautious…
The term “road rage” was coined in the USA in the 1980s by a police officer after he pulled over a motorist who shot another driver who cut him off (Sunrise Digest, 1988). Road rage is currently defined as intentionally participating in risky driving behaviors that are known to increase the likelihood of a crash. Previous definitions of road rage did not include intent. This definition change shows that road rage is something that one chooses to do instead of unconsciously doing it. Two forms of road rage have been identified: mild and severe. Mild forms of road rage include obscene gestures and name calling. Severe forms of road rage include threats, physical confrontation, and murder. Certain road conditions, like construction or a detour,…
Though not all of the authors references are backed up or clearly stated as having come from an actual, truthful, or real source, he makes a strong argument. From his references to the laws in Vermont and New Hampshire, the military, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, to rates and laws in other countries as well as the United States, Voas is convincing in his argument. In the end of Voas 's article, after making numerous references as well as…
Instantly shocking readers with a large bolded title reading “Driving the Highway from Destruction!”, Hart claims that there is indeed a growing trend of unsafety on our roads. By using the word “destruction!” with the commanding exclamation mark, the writer not only draws our attention to extract a sense of immediacy, but more importantly it implies an apocalyptic image which is indeed, responsible for the “road deaths among young drivers”. By affirming that she, “like many other drivers”, have become cognisant of such a contentious issue, the writer unintentionally implores readers to step up and join her as she places herself and her stance on the issue on a higher moral ground. Complementing this idea is also the centered graphic. Depicting hazardous signs which are all too common to drivers, the image attempts to evoke a sense of responsibility in viewers. Portraying an array of safety signs, the triangular warning of pedestrians in similarity with the octagonal sign commanding for drivers to “STOP” invokes in readers an obligation to take greater care when driving. Furthermore the use of the image is then augmented further, as by placing the cumbersome image in the middle of her article, the writer suggests that these signs cannot be…
Texting and driving is one of the most debated topics in society. Whether it affects all people or whether or not you’re just good at multi tasking. Yet, all people would come to the agreement that it is one the most dangerous activities to participate in and ends millions of lives yearly. "Drivers and Legislators Dismiss Cellphone Risks” published in New York Times by Matt Richtel and "LOL? Texting While Driving Is No Laughing Matter: Proposing a Coordinated Response to Curb this Dangerous Activity" by Alexis M. Farris are two articles that present variations of ethos, pathos, and logos and make identical arguments claiming that texting and driving is not only dangerous but is shaping the way Americans live. Both articles illustrate several accounts on the dangers of texting and driving and how the activity could potentially be stopped proving both articles to be well accounted for. While Matt Richtel and Alexis. M. Farris both reach the conclusion that texting while driving has a negative impact on people, Farris' article is far deeper and less biased then Richtel's who relies more on personal inference rather than factual evidence.…
Although most of the road rage scenarios given could have been avoided, there are precautions that could be taken in order to avoid them all together. It’s a simple solution, but often times, especially in the heat of the moment, can be hard to overcome. As a driver at the receding end of road rage, one must face the ability to remain calm. That would entail, no cutting each other off like a game of cat and mouse as the young driver did. Or even arguing/ screaming out like mothers tend to with their small children present. While certainly the need for avoiding gestures, that would tell the other person to bleep off, like Delanie did. All of the factors could potentially stop a bad situation from going to…
It showed that 61% are acts of verbal abuse, 50% involving aggressive hand gestures, and 30% of aggression is perpetuated by people in the 25-34 age group. Road rage is not limited to any age or social class. "Nearly 1 in 4 adults have committed an act of road rage according to the results of the survey, with men almost 3 times more likely to commit an aggressive act than women." More than 1 in 3 men and 1 in 4 women stated they had been the victims of some act of aggression from a road user. There are a lot of different causes of road rage. Driving on somebody's rear end or cutting somebody can provoke road rage. The psychological reasoning for this is humans are tended to be territorial. "As individuals we have personal space, or territory, which evolved essentially as a defensive mechanism anyone who invades this territory is potentially an aggressor"(reportroadrage). People also get angry if they see somebody else poorly driving. People also get mad at the multitasking kind of person somebody talking on a cell phone, reading a book and other stuff while driving (Dr. Driving). These people try to take the law into there own hand and become vigilantes. Some major effects…
The video begins with the hosts introducing the guest star Danny Preston, who is a defensive driving instructor. He claims that there are ways to turn road rage into calm and collected road revenge. The discussion starts by Preston explaining what to do when people are cut off on the road whilst driving. He says to remain calm and then follow the violator home. After obtaining their address, one can sneak into their perpetrators house and rearrange things to spook them out. It is much easier to make them pay when there is an address involved and it is also much safer than creating a scene in the middle of the highway. It is important to feel empathetic towards other drivers. Everyone is human and therefore they make mistakes, but there are…
Just about fifty percent of the drivers today use their cell phones while driving. That's crazy, that means that more than half of the drivers are distracted while on the road. Not only are you putting your life in danger you’re putting others life at risk too. What people don’t understand is when you get behind the wheel of a vehicle you’re in a machine that can do a lot of damage to you and the people and things around you if you aren't careful. Why people use their cell phones while behind the wheel is just ridiculous. If you are a distracted driver just know that if you don’t care about your life don’t harm others who want their family to be safe. You’re potentially taking a mothers child away or a child’s mother by just something as stupid as a text that could…
When it comes to driving, teenagers have a lot of factors working against them like inexperience, impulsiveness, the challenge of navigating their complex social and emotional lives and the road at the same time. According to the documentary, 100,000 accidents in the US every year are caused by drivers using mobile phones. When they are texting while driving they could not focus on driving. The careless of driver will causes the car accident happens. Alongside victims, the documentary also features interviews with the perpetrators who have killed and injured people through careless driving. For example , In Bluffton, Indiana, a driver named Chandler, admits to sending a text message that reads "I love you" just before he caused an accident that killed three people.…
Here I am captured in this irritating street where all I can do is listen to music and look at Facebook. I am waiting for cars to start moving and continue with their destination. Little do I know that ahead of me is a two hour traffic. I am already tired, bored, and furious. I cannot believe I took this road home instead of my usual route. Why do I have to try new things? I should stick to what I know. While I sit in the drivers’ sit I am still wondering why I had the bright idea of taking a new way home, a way that I had little knowledge of.…