Preview

Opinions and Social Pressure

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
926 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Opinions and Social Pressure
Solomon E. Asch “Opinions and Social Pressure” Salomon E. Asch in his essay “Opinions and Social Pressure” conducted an experiment to determine effects of group pressure towards an individual and concluded that there is a very strong tendency to conformity even when doing so conflicting with their own senses of morality. In the experiment a group of young students have to compare length of lines on two different sheets of paper. On one of them there is a sample single line and on the other one there are three lines only one of which is same size as the sample line from the first sheet. People taking part in this experiment are instructed to point at lines that are the same length. At first, during the experiment the group is unanimous in their answers and chooses the correct line, but later on the person that sits near to the end of the line in which people taking part in the experiment are sited, selects different answers then the rest of the group. As the experiment continues and the situation repeats, the isolated in selecting different than the majority answers person shows signs of feeling uncomfortable in position of dissenter. What he doesn’t know is that the rest of the group is instructed to give wrong answers while the experiment is conducted. The single individual is placed in the minority while actually giving the correct answers. Subjects of this experiment could act independently or they could go along with majority’s opinion. A prominent percentage yielded. Under the majority pressure people are more likely to accept the misleading information. There are extreme examples of totally independent individuals as well as people who totally agree with the majority almost most of the time and the tendency is highly consistent. After reconstructing the experiment the next question for the scientist to answer is which aspect of influence is more important, the size of majority or its unanimity. It turns out, that the majority size

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are two major studies in which we can look, at these are Asch and Zimbardo. Asked our student volunteers to take part in the vision test, all but one of the volunteers were colleagues of the experimenter. the volunteers were shown 3 lines the free lines were all different sizes and there was a fourth line which was the same size as one of the 3 lines. All the volunteers had to do was to say Which line was the same size as the separate fourth line. Altogether there were 123 American undergraduates being tested. Asch showed a series of lines to participants seated around a table, participants always answered in the same order. The colleagues were instructed to give the same incorrect answer on 12 of the 18 trials. On 12 critical trials 36.8% of the participants got the answer incorrect in other words they conformed with the majority. A quarter of the participants did not conform on any of the trials. Although people did conform the size of the group depended on how many people conform e.g. if there was a large group and they all said the wrong answers the participant will become suspicious and not conform. Also the participants profession could make a difference on whether they conform e.g. a maths teacher will realise that the size of the line is the same as they work with this sort of thing every day. When the difference between the sizes of the lines decreased, making it harder to distinguish the difference between the lines, the level of conformity increased. this study was only conducted on American men during a period of time when people were scared to be different. another weakness is that only one third of participants conformed the other participants stuck and gave the right answer or the answer they thought was right The next study is Zimbardo's Stanford prison experiment. To conduct this experiment a mock correctional facility was constructed in the basement of Stanford University, an advert was…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Human Behavior Quiz Paper

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages

    In experiments, the power of groups to influence an individual to agree with the incorrect judgment of the others is known as the _____.…

    • 3034 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    GREAT EMANCIPATOR?

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What evidence was presented in class to support the interpretation that Lincoln was more the “reluctant” and not the “great emancipator” as claimed in history? Support answer with 3 scholarly interpretations.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conformity in to society by everyone’s choices is engraved in the mind to fit in and to not disturb the status quo, such as clothing styles, behaviors, and personality traits are categorized into “cliques”. Within “Opinions and Social Pressure”, it is seen that against the better judgment of the subject, he/she still went along the popular consensus choosing the incorrect answer (Asch 144). Knowing this, it allows for us to conclude that peer pressure is shown to be more convincing than we can resist despite our best…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Solomon Asch conducted an experiment on group conformity. Dr. Asch sat down a group of seven students and ask them a series of questions based on a number of lines (p.155). All the students had to do was answer correctly. When Dr. Asch asked the third question one of the students was starting to wonder. The questions continued, when the students started wondering why every student was answering incorrectly (p.155).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Group pressure affects everyone involved in the situation. Whether it’s harming or helping others, your still being affected. In the short story Group Pressure by Rodney Stark an experiment was tested on a group of people to show visual perception done by Solomon Asch. In this experiment, Asch gathers two large decks of cards with different lengths of lines on them. One card will display the correct line while the other cards won’t have the correct length line. As being shown the crowd has to decide which card they think is the closet length to the actual card, the crowd will then shout out their answers. As this experiment was proceeding you pretend you’re one of the subjects. Everyone in front of you is picking the same answer as you, your confidence is boosted. You now feel like you know every answer and there’s no doubt in your mind that you can possibly get one wrong. As the experiment gets harder the other subjects are calling out different answers, answers different then yours. But your 100 percent that your right, this is…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some participants reacted with a, "distortion of perception", where they conformed on most trials, and actually believed that the confederates' answers were true. Other participants that lacked self-confidence exhibited a "distortion of judgment" (most belonged to this category) where they comprehended that they must be wrong and that the majority had to be right. Another group of participants displayed a "distortion of action", indicating that they knew the correct answer, but conformed with the majority group because they did not want to create conflict, or be looked down upon. When comparing this experiment to the short story, “Jon”, Jon represented…

    • 1814 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “Opinions and Social Pressure,” social psychologist, Solomon Asch, concludes his findings of numerous experiments conducted to reveal the impact of peer pressure among the individual. His experiments consisted of seven to nine college students; one who was the focal subject of the experiment and the rest who were members of the group instructed to answer accordingly. After many trials and the introduction of different variables, Asch finds that a person who is presented with a partner in his independency, has a higher chance not to conform to the majority. Asch concludes, “With [the partners] support the subject usually resisted pressure from the majority: 18 of 27 subjects were completely independent. But after six trials the partner joined the majority. As soon as he did so, there was an abrupt rise in the subject’s errors” (Asch 181). The subjects do not conform once a partner resists conformity as well, however, as soon as their partner joins the majority, then they begin to join also. Author, Catherine Sanderson, provides reasoning as to why the subject conforms as soon as his partner does. In her book, “Social Psychology,” she presents strategies for resisting obedience. Sanderson claims, “People who are aware of the situational pressures that lead people to obey authorities are more likely to stand up to…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Summary: A Class Divided

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mrs. Elliot third-grade class was able to understand that discrimination and prejudice created barriers which were hard to overcome and rather than judging a person on the color of their skin or how someone eye color could tell who is far more superior, we as human being should love and understand one another. The Asch Conformity Experiment was conducted by Solomon Asch who was a Polish gestalt psychologist. The experiment begins with a man or a woman and seven other subjects, who are actually a part of the research team, however, the man or the women doesn’t know that they are the only real subject. The man or the women along with the seven other subject are to be seated at a small table in a room, meanwhile the experimenter appears into the same room and placed two cards in front of all the subjects, the card on the left contains one vertical line while the card on the right displays three lines of varying length. The Experiment then asked all the subjects to choose which of the three lines on the right card matches the length of the line on the left…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    student

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Each of the 123 subjects had been placed in 18 rounds of questioning, 12 of which had been predetermined by the experimenters to be answered unanimously incorrectly by confederates. Of these subjects, 75% of them changed their answers to the majority vote at least once. When under the influence of peer pressure, the subjects accepted the majority and conformed 36.8% of the time. The individual tests differed quite a lot, with some of the subjects conforming once or twice and some who conformed to majority most of the time. 25% of the individuals who partook in the experiment did not conform at all, showing that they weren’t worried about their self-doubt, and were confident to their personal judgment.…

    • 540 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    References: Asch, S. E. (t956). Studies of independence and conformity: 1. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9), 1-70.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Asch’s conformity study made participants tell differences in length of lines when the majority answered incorrectly. These people did not receive any explanation why the majority disagreed and it dealt with an issue that was unimportant. Confusion would have been an issue and it is “hard to act independently when things don’t make sense”. People actively construe and act in response to their subjective interpretation of the experience. It is imperative to imagine oneself in the experiment to understand why someone would not have spoken up.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Group Minds

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The author does a really good job getting her point across throughout the paper. "When were in a group, we tend to think as that group does:" She also brings up the fact of joining a group to find people like ourselves, but that group might start to change our opinions or views. Another interesting point is the experiment that is brought up. The experiment had to do with two boards at different lengths but the lengths were not easily noticeable. A group of a few people would be instructed that the boards were the same and they would argue in favor of this. A pair of people wouldn't be instructed and would find out for themselves that the boards aren't the same.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Prescription Stimulants

    • 5338 Words
    • 22 Pages

    References: Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole no. 416)…

    • 5338 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    One hundred and twenty three male college students were involved in the study. Participants were shown a series of lines, a ‘standard’ line and several other lines in which they would match to the standard line. Their answers were announced one by one in seated order. All participants were told to answer unanimously before the trials began, except for one person out of the group. That one person was the focus of the study, seated at the end of the seating arrangement. His answers gave insights to the effective role social pressure plays on people’s decisions (178). During the trials, 36.8 percent of the participants sided with the unanimous incorrect answers given by the group. Another trial of the study showed, when given at least two people who answered incorrectly, it drastically swayed the opinion of the chosen individual, causing the individual to answer incorrectly by 13.6 percent. Given at least three people who answered incorrectly, the percentage jumped to 31.8 percent, however, anymore than three people would cause the effects of social pressure to remain fairly consistent (180). Solomon Asch also conducted an experiment where no subjects were told of the researchers…

    • 610 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays