Aristotle was a Greece philosopher lived from 384BC to 322BC. He wrote and taught many subjects in his career. One of his incredible writings included Rhetoric. Rhetoric is the art used to persuade or motivate an audience. Persuasion is an art used as a tool to change people’s belief, behavior, or even there attitude towards certain things. The Greece philosophers believed that to be truly effective to the audience you had to use a motivational way. The three ways Aristotle covered in Rhetoric subject was Ethos, Pathos, and Logos.…
In an essence, Plato found rhetoric to be bad because of the five problems being that rhetoric is seductive, vague, arouses emotions, used for monetary purposes, and quality changing. In consideration with the persuasive nature of rhetoric being able to out the truth. Whereas, Aristotle believed rhetoric to be beneficial to democracy, due to rhetoric being a component in the process of finding the truth. The third classical Greek Sophist brought forth ideas of ethics. Isocrates believed that teaching for money was unethical, but emphasized educating the youth to give back to the community. These Sophists taught rhetoric in different forms, but all brought forth the groundwork for how rhetoric is practiced and studied today.…
One more prominent figure in the classical history of rhetoric is Plato (428-347 B.C). Plato believed that the purpose of philosophy was to discover truth that should be independent of any special calculation of interest; he was suspicious of rhetoric because he thought it lacked any concern with a truth that was separate from the speaker’s interest. An opposition therefore developed in the classical period between rhetoric and dialectic (1), dialectic gave equal weight to both sides of an argument, while rhetoric was concerned with persuasion from a particular perspective rather than presenting a balanced point of view. For Plato, rhetoric was deceptive, because it only showed a perspective that fitted with the speaker’s point of view.…
After reading Plato’s Apology and Leviticus 17-27, I found several differences in the way people are judged for the crimes they have committed as well as, by what are actually considered crimes or sins. I want to explore these differences by asking two questions to each reading: What kind of behavior constitutes as a sin or a crime? What is the source of moral authority behind laws and legal judgments?…
In speaking of effective rhetorical persuasion, we must appeal to our target audience in a way that will get them to accept or act upon the point of view we are trying to portray. Aristotle said that we persuade others by three means: (1) by the appeal to their reason (logos); (2) by the appeal to their emotions (pathos); and (3) by the appeal of our personality or character (ethos) (Corbett and Connors 32). When Socrates, an infamous rhetorician, gave his “apology” to his fellow Athenians after being accused of atheism or not believing in the gods and corrupting the youth with similar teachings, he employed all three modes of persuasion to prove his innocence. Despite the imbalance of ethos, logos and pathos throughout his speech, I sustain that Socrates did make use of all three modes in his defense whether tactful or not.…
The accusers claim that Socrates is one of many Sophists who are “very good speakers. Indeed, they [have] reputations for being able to convince a crowd that up [is] down, that day [is] night, that the wrong answer could be the right answer, that good [is] bad and bad is good, even that injustice is justice and justice would be made to appear as injustice” (Pecorino). Furthermore, Sophists are paid for delivering speech and only care about winning debates and lawsuits more than anything else. Thus, most of them are feared and hated by Athenian people. Nevertheless, Socrates distinguish himself from Sophists by giving evidence that he “live[s]in great poverty because of [his] service to the god” (Plato 23b). While Sophists such as Gorgias of Leontini, Producs of Ceos, and Hippias of Elis charge fee for their services, Socrates never asks or receive money from anyone whom he approaches and asks questions regarding to wisdom and virtue. Unlike Sophists who are wealth and famous, Socrates is so poor because of his free service. In addition, Socrates’ intention is to help other people understand virtue and become wiser rather than teaching them how to become good speakers as Sophists do. Therefore, Socrates is not guilty of “[making] the worse into the stronger argument” (Plato…
It makes people think that anything that the rhetorician says is true, and that is the rhetorician’s job. “Gorgias claims that rhetoric makes people not only capable of speaking, but also able to know (phronein) what they are speaking about. Gorgias seems to be claiming that he can teach phronesis, or practical wisdom.”2 This means he could instruct his pupils by means of persuasion and may not have to understand the foundation or basis of the subject, yet be more convincing than any who have profession in the subject. Therefore, it is unjust to for rhetorician to have influence on ordinary people and affect the trusts in their beliefs with rhetorical devices and lavish…
(a) Comparing Aristotle defense of rhetoric with the one made by Gorgias in Plato text, it is clear that Aristotle builds Plato’s ideas , but both views differ. For example, Aristotle assumes that man's basic nature is good and rational, while Plato believes that man is in need of instruction…
The Gorgias as written by Plato, is classic that could be considered one the greatest, revolving around rhetoric that is relevant in todays modern society. Through vigorous discussion it can be conclude that the Gorgias is about the goodness and the malicious in the world. Today we live in a corrupted society where political activities influence what is better for the population as a whole, from the communities, cities and including the country were under the influence that everything that is done is to better serve us as a whole wether is evil or good is used to achieve a prospering society. It is said that one possess the art of rhetoric; rhetoric is having to do with persuasion and being able to persuaded those in ones favor, want and or…
Sophocles was known for his emphasis on the individual’s uncompromising search for truth, particularly in “Oedipus Rex.” In Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave,” he, similarly to Sophocles, illustrates man’s pursuit of truth and what that means. Plato suggests that truth is subjective to each man. But what is truer? What is illusion and what is reality? Just because something is illusion for one man does not make it falsehood for the other. “To them, I said, the truth would be literally nothing but the shadows of the images” (Plato). The story of Oedipus offers a lot of examples of the philosophy that Plato poses in his dialogue. In both works, the men first had to realize their ignorance before they could begin to acquire knowledge and true understanding of the complexities of the human condition; Oedipus in a literal sense and the man in the cave in a more theoretical sense. Oedipus discovers, after piercing out his eyes, that he has finally arrived at the truth of his life and that he now has a responsibility to share his story with his children, extended family, and citizens. And in Plato's "Allegory of the Cave," the prisoner's difficulty discovering the truth lies in his unfortunate restricted life within the cave. And when he escapes, he feels compelled to enlighten others with the newly found truth he has stumbled upon. “And when he remembered his old habitation, and the wisdom of the cave and his fellow prisoners, do you not suppose that he would felicitate himself on the charge and pity them?” (Plato) “Oedipus Rex” and Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave” are works about truth and falsehood, about sight and blindness, about light and darkness; all of which represent the great divide between illusion and reality. Oedipus is blinded by the illusion that he has fled his fate, having overcome the prophecy. He thinks he has escaped his parents, and this illusion…
Plato’s second argument against the sophists involves their means of persuasion that produce conviction without knowledge, instead of using means of persuasion that produce knowledge. Sophists produce belief instead of knowledge and teach their students to memorize information in a convincing manner, but not the actual meaning behind it. According to the textbook, they also taught their students that “notions of truth had to be adjusted to fit the ways of a particular audience in a certain time and with a certain set of beliefs and laws.”. Sophists claim to teach us about justice, while having no real knowledge on the subject. Plato argues that sophists are only interested in beliefs and opinions about justice and not justice itself, nor the meaning behind it. So he believes that since they do not know the true meaning behind…
On the other hand, Aristotle views Rhetoric as both a means to find truth on par with dialectics and an effective method of communication. Through the perspective from Aristotle, he is not as considered with rhetoric being a method of metaphor or a particular way of persuade through language tricks. As he relies on conviction to establish probability, he believes that truth is not just a matter of certainty. However, Plato insists on truth being a matter of certainty which could be disguised fairly easy by rhetorical…
Plato 's definition of rhetoric is, "the art of ruling the minds of men." (Atlantic Monthly)…
To support one's position in any matter, nothing better could be offered than a quotation from one of the works, which told of the gods and their actions. If an action of the gods could be found that was similar top that being taken by a party to a debate then that was evidence of the correctness of that action. Therefore, those who were the fastest and most accurate at being able to locate quotations and take them and apply them to a given situation would often win the debate, the contest, the lawsuit or discussion. The Sophists were very well versed in the epic tales and poems. They were able to find the most appropriate quotation to support any position. They regularly entered contests and those who won were given prizes, but no prize…
In Plato's Republic, Socrates goes to great lengths to explain and differentiate between the ideas of opinion and knowledge. Throughout society, most common men are lovers of sights and sounds. "Lovers of sights and sounds like beautiful sounds, colors, shapes, and everything fashioned out of them, but their thought is unable to see and embrace the nature of the beautiful itself (Republic 476b)." The few who do recognize the beautiful itself are followers of the sight of truth, the philosophers.…