Preview

Order 16 Rule 14 Code of Civil Procedure

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
7303 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Order 16 Rule 14 Code of Civil Procedure
GENERAL RULES FOR ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES

1. Compulsory Attendance —
A Court can compel the personal attendance of any witness residing within the local limits of its jurisdiction, or without such limits if the person to be summoned is at a place, not more than fifty miles from the Court house or not more than two hundred miles if there is a railway communication or public conveyance for 5/6th of distance, provided that he is not exempted under any of the provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. A proviso has been added to Order XVI, Rule 19, Civil Procedure Code in Punjab with the result that a Court situate in the State of Punjab may require the personal attendance of any witness residing in the State of Punjab or the Union Territory of Delhi. (High Court Notification No. 60 —General IX Y. 8, dated the 4th March, 1955).

2. Attendance of pardanashin ladies —
Under Section 132 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, women, who according to the customs and manners of the country, ought not to be compelled to appear in public shall be exempt from personal attendance in Court.

3. Other exemptions —
The Court has a discretion to exempt from attendance as witness any person who in the opinion of the Court, is from sickness or infirmity unable so to attend (Order XXVI Rule 1, C.P.C.), or being a Civil or Military Officer of the Government, cannot attend without detriment to the Public Service (Order XXVI Rule 4, C.P.C.). As regards the attendance of Patwaries in Civil Courts Part B of this Chapter should be referred to.

4. Evidence by Commission —
The Court may issue a Commission for the examination of a witness, whose attendance cannot be compelled according to law, or cannot be secured for any other sufficient reason in the circumstances specified in Order XXVI of the Civil Procedure Code.

5. Service of processes —
The general procedure for issue of processes to witnesses is the same as that in respect of defendants. For detailed



Bibliography: http://www.lawzonline.com/bareacts/civil-procedure-code/orderXVI-code-of-civil-procedure.htm http://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/upload/CourtRules/CourtRuleFile_XU7A6U42.PDF http://www.lawzonline.com/bareacts/civil-procedure-code/orderXVIA-code-of-civil-procedure.htm http://www.advocatekhoj.com/library/bareacts/codeofcivilprocedure/orderXVI.php?Title=Code%20of%20Civil%20Procedure,%201908&STitle=Summoning%20And%20Attendance%20Of%20Witnesses

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The principal piece of the trail procedure would be the first appearance. In this the litigants are brought under the steady gaze of a judge to be given forma notification of the charges against them, to be educated concerning their rights, to be given the chance to hold a legal advisor or to have one named to speak to them, and maybe to be managed the open door for safeguard. The respondent if taken into authority must be offered an in court…

    • 976 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    CSU Board Case

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages

    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, having represented and warranted their authority to enter into and execute this Agreement, has executed this Agreement effective as of the last date written…

    • 1397 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil Litigation Unit 3

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JUSTIN WILLIAM KING, ) ) Plaintiff. ) ) ) v. ) ) ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) COMPLAINT Comes Now the plaintiff, Justin King, by and through his attorney, states as follows: PARTIES AND JURISDICTION 1. Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of Cook County, State of Illinois. 2. Defendant is a corporation with its principal place of business in Missouri and carries on business in Illinois. 3. This court has subject matter jurisdiction over the claims presented in this complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 because plaintiff is a resident of Illinois and the defendant is a citizen of Missouri and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclusive of fees and costs. 4. Personal jurisdiction and venue are proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because the acts of defendant caused harm to plaintiff in Cook County, in United States Court for the Northern District of Illinois. COUNT I: ________ 5. On or about April 8, 2011, plaintiff Justin King, while in the exercise of due care, was operating his motorcycle on Interstate 57, heading in a south direction, in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 6. On the occasion in question, defendant, Frank Cuellar, a resident of Illinois, was operating a truck owned by Anheuser-Busch as its agent, and was traveling in a south direction on Interstate 57, so called, a public highway in the City of Paxton, Illinois. 7. On the occasion in question, plaintiff Justin King was traveling south on Interstate 57 in Paxton, IL on his motorcycle when he noticed a truck with Anheuser-Busch logo traveling behind him headed in the same direction. The plaintiff noticed Mr. Cuellar flashing his headlights requesting to pass the plaintiff and proceeded to switch lanes. Justin King then changed lanes to the right hand lane…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    After careful consideration, the judge invoked the procedure and allowed for the child witness, prosecutor, and defense counsel to move to a separate room while the judge, jury and defendant remained in the courtroom. The child witness was then examined and cross-examined, in person, while those who remained in the courtroom were able to view everything through the CCTV system display.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    What law is applicable to the determination of the competency of the wife of the petitioner as a witness?…

    • 636 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the first half of the interview, Cox and Allison, were certain about their testimony. After long hours of interrogation, the two witnesses have complied with the police’s story to avoid conflict and to be released from custody. The witnesses have also become suggestible during the interrogation, they have answered falsely in some leading questions to please the interviewer. An interview with an should not give any kind of stress to the witness. The police should help the witnesses remember by keeping them relax and asking relevant questions instead of using the coercive Reid…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1.06 Review

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Criteria used to establish an expert witness might be the person’s degrees, and the number of years of experience that that person has in the field…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eye witness an expert testimony helps reveal specific truths and accuracy in evidence. The Court bailiff will swear all witnesses to tell the truth and nothing but the truth. Normally the prosecution questions their own witnesses to strengthen their side of the case. The defense then has the chance to cross examine. All…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Though Shakespeare’s play celebrates the beauty of love, it is ultimately about the destructive nature of pride…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bar Vocal Study Guide

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages

    COMPETENCE AND COMPELLABLITY OF WITNESSES THE EVIDENCE OF CHILDREN The purpose of this handout is to combine in one document all the provisions…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The court concludes that the marital disqualification rule does apply to deposition testimony. Deponent, when appropriate, may refuse to answer deposition questions which call for testimony prohibited by the rule and not falling within an exception.”…

    • 640 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Importance of Article 86

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    (c) That the accused, without authority, failed to go to the appointed place of duty at the time prescribed.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Business Law

    • 7390 Words
    • 30 Pages

    I am Ivy from class SUD11, Sunderland of University. I write this memo to you in order to aid you comprehend my work easier.…

    • 7390 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is important that all relevant information be disclosed to the accused. Refusal to do so will always bring the administration of justice into dispute. There are circumstances though where that may not be possible. In the events where disclosing certain information could bring harm to the security and safety of persons certain information may be withheld. There are four considerations that must be made by the Crown counsel should the defence request information about witnesses: the first is to make sure that the accused will get fair trial; second is that witness are neither the property of the Crown or Defence; third, the witnesses right not to testify unless…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Self defence

    • 12925 Words
    • 52 Pages

    Lowery, Jack, “A Statutory study of self-defence and defence of others as an excuse for homicide”, University of Florida Law Review, Vol. V (1952), p. 58.…

    • 12925 Words
    • 52 Pages
    Powerful Essays