Preview

Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101, By Christopher Browning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
870 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101, By Christopher Browning
When look at the various atrocities of history, it invariably us to think of the perpetrators as being different from normal people. When we think about them, immediately picture of stereotypical villains with no moral sensibility who indulge in killing innocent people for pleasure and thrills come in our mind. We think like this because we do not like to think perpetrators as humans as we are who were responsible for genocide. And no one had ever thought can normal human beings under the right circumstances, are capable of committing suicide? And the answer is yes, normal human beings can cause genocide and Christopher Browning’s book, Ordinary men: Reserved Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in Poland give a clear cut understanding …show more content…
As author explains, it was here he first encountered the setting up of Reserve Police Battalion 101. Further, Browning describes the particular effect this establishment had on him. “Though I had been studying archived documents and Holocaust court record for nearly twenty years, the impact this indictment was extremely powerful and disturbing. Never Before had I seen the monstrous deeds of the Holocaust so starkly set side by side with the human face of the killers” (Browning, xvi). This made him to write the book Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 101 and the Final Solution in …show more content…
However, this is not the surprising aspect of the briefing. After briefing about the task, the points meant to reassure that it was absolutely “okay” to kill these innocent men and women. Trapp, further says that “if any of the older men among them does not like to do the task can move out. This chapter leaves the reader in desperately knowing whether any of the men from the battalion stepped out from taking part in the genocide. I thought definitely people would have moved out avoiding to be responsible for execution of thousands of innocent people. But rather than knowing my answer, story moved to the second

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Romeo Dallaire Analysis

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The last story I mentioned brings up a very important part of this genocide. That is how to deal with little children being used as soldiers and weapons. Children are serving as weapons in over thirty conflicts that are now taking place in the world. Now the problem lies therein, for instance do you kill children who kill? Do you to a child pointing a gun at you…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout the novel Browning uses the judicial interrogations as his source, though these sources could be very biased. He follows the path that Reserve Police Battalion 101 follows all the way from their orders at Jozefow, Poland, to the Erntefest massacres. Browning depicts how these average mid-age men were transformed into cold-blooded killers that kill when ordered. Browning makes it clear that the Reserve Police Battalion 101 were part of the German internal police force called the Order Police. Their main duties included ghetto clearing and the deportation of Jews. When I read this I thought by order police they were simply there to keep order and prevent any type of uprisings, but Browning shows such isn’t the case when he describes the type of “Order” Reserve Police Battalion 101 was ordered to keep.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early in the Holocaust, German army units participated in the massacre of the Jews in Eastern Europe. Among these, the Reserve Police Battalion 101 was made up of civilian police men, German men, and volunteers subject to the military draft. They were middle-aged working family men with a lower middle class background. Their main purpose was to be an essential source of manpower in holding down German-occupied Europe. In 1941, they were told that they had to perform a gruesome and undesirable task executing the Jewish population in the area they patrolled. My paper will be focusing on factors that lead up to how these “ordinary men” allow themselves to be a part of a systematic genocide. In trying to understand the factors that made these men’s crimes possible the factors that are central to their actions are several: peer pressure and conformity, the roles, the developing of a rationale for killing, and the environment they were in. Without these elements, the men of Police Battalion 101would not have become executioners.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1992, Christopher Browning published his book Ordinary Men, a work in which he narrates the experiences of the men in the Reserve Police Battalion 101. Browning begins by classifying the men as ordinary people, as his title suggests, but quickly reveals not only how easily these men succumbed to the vicious acts they were expected to carry out, but how swiftly they began to take extra measures that were unnecessary as a result of their loss of morality. Based on this, Browning’s account of this Battalion allows him to explain that the Holocaust was made possible…

    • 875 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the excerpt from Christopher Browning’s “Ordinary Men: Reserve Police Battalion 1010 in Poland”, Browning told us of the elite killing squad of less than 500 men, that killed around 83,000 Jews. (215) Not just men, ordinary men, like the ones you see every day. Most of the men were involved in white collar jobs, just trying to support their family when they were chosen for the group. What caused these men to commit outrageous acts against humanity? Can anyone be brainwashed to execute deeds like these men? If you grew up your entire life being told a certain group of people were evil and bad, and you had the opportunity to help your country and kill these people, would you, could you? These were the questions Browning was trying to uncover.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Every case of genocide and mass murder has its own story and anotherness, they also didn’t happen in the blink of an eye. The perpetrators of these events have always had a fundamental reason to what led them to execute such gruesome crimes. Most may know, the German holocaust and the Rwandan genocide are the two most known and most terrible violation of human rights because of the amount of people that were killed and the way in which these murders were performed. This essay is a discussion of key similarities and differences of the roles of perpetrators in the two case studies; Rwandan genocide and the German…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The main question raised in the One Day in Jozefow: Initiation to Mass Murder article is that of how did the Nazis get the manpower and successfully eliminate so many Polish Jews in a mere matter of eleven months. What is found is that the Nazis did not actually use real military force to clear the ghettos. When they were given orders leaders did not have enough men to successfully clear ghettos therefore they turned to normal everyday Polish police. They also gathered prisoners of war who were from places like the Ukraine and Lithuania. The Nazis also took order police who were stationed in the German government. This gave them the numbers they were so lacking and that were vital to them to take on their orders.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Brigitte Lau argues that the image of German turn-of-the-century soldiers as plotters of Herero “genocide” is inappropriate and certainly inaccurate. I, for one, certainly do not agree with Lau’s statement. I will be discussing the recent work of Casper Erichsen and a few other writers and scholars to support my argument: The German-Herero war of 1904-8 was genocide. The concept of genocide is a widely debated topic.…

    • 2081 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Mass Killing Summary

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Shaw argues that studies on genocide have concentrated too heavily on the specific perpetrators and victims with regard to intentions and identities respectively. Instead, he wants to propose that the crime of genocide should be understood within the structure of conflict situations. The most important aspect of genocide studies from the point of view of politics is that the concept of genocide must be clarified, Shaw believes that scholarship should provide this elucidation. By returning to the original definition proposed by Lemkin, the focus is more generally on attacks by the armed against the unarmed. Shaw states that “Lemkin invented ‘genocide’ because he wanted to describe – and highlight for countervailing action – a general class of violent actions.” Taking lessons from one of the most influential studies on war by Carl von Clausewitz, Shaw sees genocide as a form of war directed against civilians. Debates about genocide have certainly advanced since the introduction of the term, yet, Shaw feels these debates from the 1940s onwards have lost two very key aspects of the original concept. In agreement with Lemkin the omission of cultural genocide or social destruction meaning not just physically but a way of life and how genocide relates to war are vital in understanding the nature of the crime. He argues that “Genocide always involves physical violence but it involves many other things as well. Defining genocide by killing misses the social aims that lie behind it. Genocide involves mass killing but it is much more than mass killing.” Similar to some of the arguments made by Claudia Card in relation to the inclusion of cultural genocide, Shaw’s assertion that genocide must be viewed in the context of war provides a valuable framework for understanding the particular violence against civilians. The use of word civilians here is important for Shaw, rather than the UN Genocide…

    • 2299 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ordinary Men

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages

    The arguments that Christopher Browning emphasizes in Ordinary Men are based on his beliefs about the Holocaust. His argument touches base on the idea that regular citizens of Germany could commit such horrible acts without being coerced into doing so. He examines the side of the Reserve Police Battalion 101 and tries to figure out just why these gentlemen participated in the mass shootings and deportations of the Holocaust. In fact should these "gentlemen" even be called gentlemen enlight of the acts they committed upon other men?…

    • 2572 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As logical as this reason sounds, it is, nonetheless, a historically inaccurate assertion. While Browning only examines one battalion from the Holocaust in his book, it seems reasonable to assume that the consequences those men received for choosing not to kill were common among other battalions as well. For Reserve Police Battalion 101, at the beginning of one of their first assignments they were given the opportunity to opt out. Their leader, Major Trapp, “made an extraordinary offer: if any of the older men among them did not feel up to the task that lay before him, he could step out” (2). Not only were they given the option to withdraw at the beginning, some men asked to opt out right before the action at Jósefów, and others withdrew after it started (61). Often, the men who chose not to participate were restationed and assigned jobs, such as driving a truck being on guard duty. The men were not killed for the decision they made, and the consequences they received for this choice were minimal. One of the most obvious “consequences” of a man’s choice not to kill was being considered less manly and more cowardly among his companions. The men might have felt embarrassed among their friends for not having gone through with the killing, it…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is no denying that human nature plays a big role genocide.The need for power is a fundamental flaw in human nature that causes suffering, pain, and death all around the world. If this fact is not addressed, if genocides continue to be denied, we can never learn as a species and grow from our mistakes.…

    • 289 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I personally think genocide is wrong in every way you can think of. Why would anyone want to deliberately kill a group of people based on race or ethnicity? There have been much genocide to take place around the world, but some are better known than others. Some people have different theories on why genocide takes place. I think that genocide occurs for a couple reasons. The leaders of the genocide may feel that the group they are eliminating could be a potential threat somehow. Another reason may be to spread fear among real enemies, also to implement a belief or religious view. I don’t really see how the Jews were a threat to Hitler but by eliminating the Jews Hitler gained a lot of power. I think the leaders know that the groups of people are not threats I just think the biggest reason is to spread fear real enemies that will defiantly be a threat someday. They do it to make a point and show that they aren’t afraid to kill. I don’t agree with killing millions to prove that at all. Some genocide occurs because of economic wealth. And what I mean by this is that if one groups sees potential in something but another group is standing in the way of success they may just feel the need to eliminate the group so they can have economic wealth. I still don’t see what brings anyone happiness by killing millions of innocent people just because you want to prove that you’re the top country or something like that. Genocide is stupid in my opinion and I see no point for it whatsoever. The more I actually think about genocide the more I become in shock at the fact that there people in world who can kill and not think twice about. I’d feel bad if I killed a deer...I can’t even imagine killing a human. I noticed that there has not been genocide in the United States which I am very thankful for. I feel very bad for the people who are in foreign countries where genocide may not be frowned upon. I’m sure there are many people in those countries that wish they…

    • 3987 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    “We were all born with a powerful herd instinct and it can force otherwise rational people to act in inexplicable ways,” (193). It is part of human nature for people to follow a higher power. We can show unexplained reactions when in extreme situations and follow as we are told. We are not inherently good or evil, we react quickly as we are told and not as we should and be rational. There were killers during the genocide who were not entirely evil. “Individual acts of courage happened every single day of the genocide. Some were partial killers, it is true, showing compassion to some and murdering others,” (200) This shows how people can go from murdering to being compassionate humans. We are able to be on both ends of the spectrum and produce both good and evil actions.…

    • 926 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Genocide & Cruelty

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Throughout history people have taken actions which show us that some people are cruel and participate in outrageous acts. We can go back and look at the United States and their use of slaves from Africa. In Germany, less then 100 years ago, Adolf Hitler and the Nazis orchestrated one of the most hateful and dehumanizing acts with their concentration camps with the killings of millions of Jews, Gypsies, gays and others. Following these devastating acts the United Nations said they would not let genocide like the concentration camps ever occur again. But just 11 years ago in Rwanda 800,000 people were killed in genocide with little or no intervention from the United States or any other country. Philip Hallie spoke about some of the actions and the reason behind some people and their cruelty in ÒFrom Cruelty to Goodness.Ó In the article Hallie is questioned as to whether these acts of genocide can be prevented through good or if these acts can not be stopped and are an event in history. Hallie makes a great point when he says that goodness can prevail over evil. My feelings are similar to those of Hallie as I feel that there is some good in everyone and that genocides and Rwanda can be prevented or helped through good.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays