[pic]
university institutional academic public governance private education political
[pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic][pic]Ads by Google
Study Art and Design
Savannah College of Art and Design
The University for Creative Careers www.scad.edu/apply SUNY Purchase College
Study from Home or Any Location!
3 Week, 4 Credit Online Courses
Purchase.edu/WinterOnlineSession
Distance Learning Degrees
Recognised British Degrees: MSc
In Marketing, Business, Finance www.StudyInterActive.org MBA In Singapore
Join The NANYANG MBA, Singapore 's
Best, Ranked #4 in Asia. Apply!
NanyangMBA.ntu.edu.sg
Finance&Accounting Degree
Study Finance and Accounting, Top
Masters Degree, London, UK www.LSBF.org.uk/Finance Начало формы
Search All U.S. Universities [pic][pic][pic]
Конец формы
The organizational structures of American colleges and universities vary distinctly, depending on institutional type, culture, and history, yet they also share much in common. While a private liberal arts college may have a large board of trustees, and a public research university nested in a state system no trustees of its own, the vast majority of public and private universities are overseen by an institutional or system-wide governing board. This somewhat paradoxical combination of distinctiveness and uniformity reflects the unique characteristics of individual colleges and universities, and the shared-task environment (including strategic planning, fiscal oversight, curriculum planning, and student affairs) common to American postsecondary institutions. Scholars of higher education view many aspects of private colleges and universities as significantly different than public universities. Yet the reliance on bureaucratic organizational structures and the belief in research, advanced instruction, and service at both types of
Bibliography: AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF UNIVERSITY PROFESSORS (AAUP). 1995. AAUP Policy Documents and Reports, 8th edition. Washington, DC: American Association of University Professors Press. BALDRIDGE, J. VICTOR. 1971. Power and Conflict in the University: Research in the Sociology of Complex Organizations. New York: J. Wiley. BALDWIN, ROGER G., and CHRONISTER, JAY L. 2001. Teaching Without Tenure: Policies and Practices for a New Era. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. BERGER, JOSEPH B., and MILEM, JEFFREY. 2000. "Organizational Behavior in Higher Education and Student Outcomes." In Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. XV, ed. John C. Smart. New York: Agathon. BIRNBAUM, ROBERT. 1988. How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organization and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. BOLMAN, LEE G., and DEAL, TERRENCE E. 1997. Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership, 2nd edition. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. ETZIONI, AMITAI. 1964. Modern Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. FISHER, JAMES L., and KOCH, JAMES V. 1996. Presidential Leadership. Phoenix, AZ: ACE/Oryx Press. GIEGER, ROGER. 1986. The Growth of American Research Universities, 1900–1940. New York: Oxford University Press. HYMAN, HAROLD M. 1986. American Singularity: The 1787 Northwest Ordinance, the 1862 Homestead and Morrill Acts, and the 1944 GI Bill of Rights. Athens: University of Georgia Press. INGRAM, RICHARD T. 1996. "New Tensions in the Academic Boardroom." Educational Record 77 (2–3):49–55. KERR, CLARK. 1963. The Uses of the University. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. MILLETT, JOHN. 1984. Conflict in Higher Education: State Government Coordination Versus Institutional Independence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. PUSSER, BRIAN. 2000. "The Contemporary Politics of Access Policy: California after Proposition 209." In The States and Public Higher Education: Affordability, Access, and Accountability, ed. Donald E. Heller. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. SLAUGHTER, SHEILA, and LESLIE, LARRY L. 1997. Academic Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. VEYSEY, LAURENCE. 1965. The Emergence of the American University. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.