Preview

Otto Von Bismarck's Responsibility For World War I

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
553 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Otto Von Bismarck's Responsibility For World War I
Otto von Bismarck became the Prime Minister of Prussia in 1862 and began his campaign for unifying Germany the same year. He managed to unify his country and become Chancellor of Germany in 1871 after years of war and political turmoil. This unification along with the other actions by Bismarck make him fairly responsible for starting WWI but nowhere near entirely at fault. These other actions include creation of strong nationalism in both Germany and other countries as a consequence, build up of armaments, and the creation of the Dual Alliance and Triple Alliance. Though other people were responsible for abusing his creations to begin WWI. Primarily this falls on Wilhelm II who, used Bismarck’s creations to further his desire of colonialism. Also Germans were not entirely at fault for WW1’s outbreak as many …show more content…

Bismarck began this war after securing the friendship of both the Russians, the French, and that of Austria as to prevent any interference from bigger stronger nations. To gain the trust of these nations made a number of decisive moves. He had the Prussians fight alongside the Russians and quell a Polish rebellion together. He promised the French some territory and told the Austrians it was simply Germans protecting Germans. Together the Prussians and Austrians quickly crushed the Danes and secured the two territories. Next came the war with Austria. Bismarck again set himself up with allies and other diplomatic persuasions to keep any other major power out of the fighting. He formed an alliance with Italy for the price of Venice and got Napoleon III to remain neutral. Bismarck, with the help of the Prussian general Helmuth von Moltke, defeated the Austrians in a matter of weeks and unified most of the rest of the German states. The recruitment of the southern German states was a difficult process. As he could not just go to war with them as that would not create the Germany Bismarck had envisioned.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The debate of Germanys responsibility for the outbreak of war first began with the charge of war guilt given in Article 231 of the Versailles Treaty. Germany rejected Article 231 and successfully campaigned against it as by 1950 it had become widely accepted that Germany where not solely responsible for the outbreak of war in 1914. The first source from Gordon Corrigan, Mud, Blood and Poppycock, published in 2003 addresses Germany’s “unconditional support” to Austria- Hungary to support the idea of Germany being the main reason for the outbreak of World War 1. In this source Corrigan refers to Fritz Fischer’s theory in which he argued that Germany’s leaders might not have been solely to for what happened in 1914 but hold a substantial share of the responsibility. Source 2 from L.F.C Turner, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1970 agrees with Source 1 by reinforcing that it was Germany’s support to Austria and the Blank Cheque that were vital in the starting of War. On the other hand, Source 3 from James Joll, The Origins of the First World War, published in 1984 disagrees with source 1 as Joll highlights the involvement of other countries with a main focus on Britain being a main factor in the cause of war. Source 2 agrees with this to some extent as it also discusses that Germany is not the only country that is responsible.…

    • 1323 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    What did Bismarck substitute for the alliance of the three emperors that promised neutrality if the other was attacked?…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    All of the sources give different impressions as to wether Germany's leaders are responsibe for the outbreak of the First World War. Source 1 seems to strongly suggest that German leaders and the German Government did in fact push for the war with Hewitson blaming the Army and suggesting that Germany was looking for an opportunity to start war however he does not fully support the view that German leaders were responsible.Porter and Armour (Source 2) strongly supports this view by again pointing to the millitary and prime minister Bethmann Hollweg looking for an opportunity to wage war but again not fully placing the blame on Germany but looking at the threating actions of Russia and Britain. In contrast to both Source 1 and 2 Norman Stone ( Source 3) does not blame Germany, instead he suggest that the tension in Europe for the last decade finally reached an ultimatum in the July crisis and the war was the fault of all Great powers.…

    • 899 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War 1 Dbq Analysis

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Although Count Brockdorff-Rantzau, the German delegation leader believed that Germany was not at all responsible for world war one, the Treaty of Versailles take it that Germany is the one responsible for this war due to their loss(Doc.4). At the delegation to the Versailles Peace Conference the German delegation leader had protested that one of the causes of this war was imperialism. The method of imperialism added to the threat to other countries because of its policies of retaliation and expansion(Doc.5). As a result of there being an expansion throughout European nations, mobilization occurred. Mobilization lead to militarism adding to the factors of tension and threats. While, both the…

    • 595 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Sharon McElwee’s literary analysis of Frederic Douglass literary piece, “The Narrative of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, by Frederick Douglass,” Sharon breaks down the different key elements in Douglass’ story that make it so outstanding. Frederick Douglass is famous for his speech given during a time where slavery was still considered acceptable and was used by most wealthy white. Slavery was not viewed as cruel, but a valuable business that could earn them money. Although Douglass was not alone, his speech stands out among the others who were fighting for their freedom.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The unification of both Germany and Italy brought great change in these countries. This process resulted in these countries to focus on for their independence, economic growth, and a strong nationalism. Also, there is another role of the unification and it is an occurrence of war, separation and controlling politics. War is a natural force which leads to unite some nations as wells as divide others. In the unification process, it is essential to have a confident and courageous leader. Bismarck was a leader in Germany while Cavour was a leader in Italy. Bismarck’s ideas were based on the pure survival. He insisted to work hard in a forceful way thought it might be brutal, to unify the Germany and therefore he was recognized as “Bloddy Iron”. The leadership of Italy was primarily based on the political issues.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nationalism Dbq

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Who and/or what caused WW1? Well there can be many different points of views and answers to this question. Many people believed that it was Germanys fault for declaring war on Russia, all though Russia only mobilized to protect their borders. This caused allies of Russia to help and attack Germany. It was sort of a big chain reaction to backing of each other’s allies. (Doc 5) Says that the mobilization of Russia caused Germany to attack and this was only a defensive attack. There are also more perspectives to the cause of World War 1, some people say that the cause of the war was the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand. Some people refer to this as “The shot heard around the world” (Doc 7) The assassination of Archduke Ferdinand caused war tensions between countries and Germany was also a threat to countries because of the Military Advancements that they were greatly getting stronger in. Russia and Austria were advancing contradictory claims to Germany. (Doc 8) Who was to blame for World War 1? Russia felt that they should unite all Slavic people, in which Austria-Hungary wanted to rule all Slavic people in which causing tensions between the two countries. Britain felt that it was their duty to protect Belgium because they were neutral. Every country feared something in which caused the war as some people say, which would be another perspective to the causes of the war. (Doc 9) Three factors that had the greatest impact on the war were Imperialism, Nationalism, and Militarism as well as another major factor which were Alliances. (MAIN) Some more factors that could be said were causes of the war…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Great War Causes

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Initially, these alliance systems were intended to preserve peace in Europe; on the contrary, it drove them into world war. These alliance systems developed their roots when Prussia’s chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, claimed Germany to be a peaceful power, even though he assumed France wanted revenge for its defeat in the Franco-Prussian war. Thus, Beck states that “in 1879, Bismarck formed the Dual Alliance between Germany and Austria-Hungary; three years later, Italy joined the two countries, forming the Triple Alliance.” During the same year, to ensure that France did not make an alliance with Russia, Bismarck immediately formed an alliance with Russia. Nonetheless, under the reign of Germany’s new leader Kaiser Wilhelm II, Germany’s treaty with Russia broke and Russia later formed a defensive military alliance with France in 1892 and 1894. Although outraged by this alliance, Wilhelm II focused on starting a shipbuilding project in order to make the German navy identical to the famous British fleet. Based on the distrust of attack, Britain formed an alliance with France and Russia, named the Triple Entente. These alliances faced off at the Austria-Hungarian and Siberian assassination conflict. Even though Germany did not give support to its ally Austria-Hungary, Tsar Nicholas ordered…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One cause of World War I was Militarism. Germany had an industrialized military and spent millions of dollars trying improve and prepare them for war. Many other countries seen this newfound competition and started to try and rebuild their armies and navy so they could keep up. With Germany’s new and improved army, they started to gain confidence and were convinced that they could win a war. Germany was very focused on utilizing their army. As soon as the war declared, Germany without a doubt didn’t hesitate to “make the first move.” This caused a problem however because of the other nations rush to industrialize their armies and try to make them just as good or if not better than Germanys. Militarism played a huge part in the cause of World War I.…

    • 359 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    asdsa

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages

    European leaders believed creating a balance of power would prevent one country from being more powerful than another European country. The idea was if Germany, England, France, and Russia were all equal in power, than there would be no war. But the Chancellor of Prussia, Otto von Bismarck, thought differently. He didn’t like that Germany was being squished by Russia and France, so to solve this problem he created an alliance with Austria- Hungary.…

    • 567 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bismarck and Metternich

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bismarck sought to unite Germany by engaging into wars including the Danish War, the Austro-Prussian War, and finally the Franco-Prussian War. Many of Metternich’s and Bismarck’s goals resulted in their achievements. His most important legacy is the unification of Germany.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bismarck provoked Austria to fight in the Seven Weeks' War. A single battle, the Battle of Königgrätz on July 3, 1866, decided the war and decided the fate of Austria. Prussian-led Germany would forever exclude Austria. After this victory, the German Confederation was officially dissolved, and several northern German states joined into a North German Confederation with Prussia. In 1867, Bismarck was appointed Chancellor of the North German Confederation, and Wilhelm I served as…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry Kissinger Email

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Bismarck was an astute and revered leader in the European community. His departure signaled a change in Germany’s foreign policy. Germany’s pursuit for its own security became the reason for its insecurity. Germany became the strongest military power in continental Europe and caused Great Britain, France and Russia to align against it. Ironically, for the greater part of Imperial Germany’s history, Russia was considered the main threat to peace in Europe. Russia always wanted more land and craved for territorial expansion.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War I Essay

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages

    World War I was an explosion, but the fuse had been burning for a long while. The major European nations (Great Britain, France, Germany, and Russia) believed that if the nations were balanced, then war could be prevented (www.sanjuan.edu).Germany and its leader, Otto von Bismarck, felt that being in the middle of two powerful nations (France and Russia) would not be wise, so he actively sought out to make an alliance with at least one of them. When that eventually failed, he formed an alliance with Austria-Hungary and Italy; this became known as the Triple Alliance. In response, France, Russia, and Great Britain formed an alliance known as the Triple Entente. This caused both sides to distrust each other and prepare for conflict by adding ships guns and men to their ever-growing arsenal.…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    28th June 1919, Germany was forced to take all the blame and responsibility for World War One at the Treaty of Versailles, which wasn’t entirely just, because even though German’s aggression might have made the war happen sooner, sooner or later a war was inevitable.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays