Preview

Outline For War On Terror Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
583 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Outline For War On Terror Essay
War on Terror Outline
I. Introduction to War on Terror
1. The War on Terror was initiated by the United States and the United Kingdom after terrorist attacks on both countries.
2. It was started to try to extinguish Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups
3. War on Terror is also known as Operation Enduring Freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan.
4. On December 18th, 2011 troops exited Iraq and began their focus on Afghanistan’s terrorism conflicts.
5. Today, The War in Afghanistan is happening.
II. Judicial Branch
1. The Judicial Branch handles all of the court cases against terrorist that are captured.
2. The terrorist that are awaiting trial are imprisoned in Guantanamo Bay.
3. The Most known War on Terror court case was in Ashton vs. Al Qaeda Islamic Army after the
…show more content…

One of the most notable moves made by the Executive Branch was Operation Neptune Spear. Operation Neptune Spear was when the President ordered Seal Team Six to kill or capture terrorist leader Osama Bin Laden
3. The President initiated the War on Terror back in 2001 in response to the terrorist attacks.
4. President Bush was well known for his actions in his eight year term which main consisted of the War on Terror
IV. Legislative Branch
1. Congress is responsible for all of the funding that goes into the War on Terror
2. They decide the acts that are made in response to situations regarding the War on Terror
3. Congress has passed four acts in the past ten years to help the countries involved in the War on Terror.
4. Congress played a huge role in 2011 when the conflict in Syria arose. They decided how involved they got in the country.
5. In certain cases congress has power to declare war.
V. Political Parties
1. Democratic Party
a. Have a goal of ending the war by certain time. Barack Obama wants to be fully out of Afghanistan by 2014
b. They don’t want any troops or bases in Iraq
c. Prevent terrorism by educating the Muslim world
d. Internationalize Iraqi


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    3 - On September 11, 2001, nearly 3,000 people were killed in the terrorist attacks at the World Trade Center…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Government Court Cases

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages

    3. The Supreme Court decided that even though the executive order was on the shady side of the Constitution, it was justified because they were in a time of “emergency and peril”.…

    • 6581 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hrm 531 Week 3 Quiz

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    7. In response to the attacks on September 11, 2001, whom did the United States attack?…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    The war on terror presents an unpredictable challenge for the United States. Throughout history, the motivation of man’s self-interest has concluded in the domination of those with little or no power. Habeas Corpus is written in the constitution as a right of the people and should be a safeguard to protect all accused persons, but many presidents have found ways not to enforce the right. In history the writ of habeas corpus has been challenged by many president from Lincoln to most recently Bush with abuse of power by the president. I will exam whether the president goes against the constitution to protect the safety of its citizens in a time of war or is it an abuse of power because the president is the commander and chief. Is the president acting on behalf of the people or is it a personal agenda.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    War powers between the legislative and the executive branch is an important and complex issue in American national politics because there are multiple interpretations of what constitutes the appropriate relationship between the legislative and the executive branch in regard to war powers. Both Louis Fisher in his book, Presidential War Power and John Yoo in his book, The Power of War and Peace: The Constitution and Foreign Affairs After 9/11 focus on what is the appropriate sharing of war powers between the legislative and executive branch? Fisher and Yoo are both scholars in this area of study but have different opinions on what constitutes as sharing of war powers between the legislative and the executive branch. This paper will focus on…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Geographic Isolationism

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages

    For most of U.S. history, the ____________ was the only important congressional foreign-policy player because of its constitutional role in reviewing and approving treaties. Senate…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A. From the Web site www.boogieonline.com/revolution “The Effective Death Penalty and Anti-Terrorism Act of 1996 gave extensive authority to federal law enforcement agencies.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    On September 2001, congress passed a resolution authorizing the use of military forces to fight terrorism no matter how difficult the consequences were. Congress also granted new powers to enforce officials. During the…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president is the chief diplomat of foreign affairs and commander in chief of the armed forces. The president has the duties of including negotiating treaties and appoints ambassadors to represent the United States overseas. Without Congress consent President can act upon his treaty without the 2/3 Congressional vote. An example would be in the incident in March of 2011. When ordering…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thirdly, terrorism became the number one agenda on the US foreign policy; before 911 intelligence operations had existed it wasn't until 911 that they were given high priority, with the creation of the Homeland Security, which is aimed to protect America from terrorism. Fourthly, the US doctrine changed from one of containment and deterrence as was used during the Cold War, to the use of prevention and pre-emption. Which is a highly controversial issue that will be addressed later in the…

    • 2178 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the government response isn’t perfect the government is striving to make the necessary improvement to keep United States safe. The legislative passes laws and options to fight off terrorist attacks to defend innocent civilians from taking any further damage, deploying a weapons and tactics team to do the job. Legislative branch focuses on enforcing special weapon in tactics to advance towards terrorism. The legislative branch assisted a training course to provide the team proper skill against terrorism. The judicial speaks their minds and discusses different methods against terrorist intruders involving the Supreme Court ideals. The judicial branch also developed a project to support bringing terrorism to justice. Executive Director of the executive pointed out that judicial authorities interpret a critical role in the anti-terrorism and relevant international instruments played. Do, they face several challenges, especially if they were also needed to protect the human rights, including the rights of victims of terrorism and the rights of those accused of crimes related to terrorism including their right to a fair trial. Judges of the Supreme Court was responsible to ensure the legality of the national provisions transposing international standards, for the assessment of the conformity of national laws with international standards and to interpret the standards already by international courts. The executive also authorized to use the Armed Forces of the United States this determines to be necessary and appropriate in order to defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat by terrorist attackers. The executive branch takes part in a struggle with the judicial branch over the war on…

    • 735 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    theory on Habeas Corpus

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Vladeck, S. I., Congress, the Commander-in-Chief, and the Separation of Powers after Hamdan, 16 TRANSNAT”L. & CONTEMP.PROBS.933, 950-63 (2007)…

    • 2153 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brotherhood

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Before the September 11 attacks many Americans believed the United States, a country founded upon its bravery and freedom, was untouchable. On that dreadful day, America was knocked off its pedestal and forced into the war on terror. Inadvertently to many Americans, they fail to realize why this war was unique and not like any other conflict the United States has come across before. America now faced a new type of enemy the Taliban, an organization known for its ruthless behavior and severe attacks and driven by the true nation of Islam. Many Americans wondered why such a violent organization would attack the United States, as well as, what would drive an organization to revert to such evil tactics.…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays