Overcoming an Ethical Dilemma

As a researcher at the University of Dubai, my advisor asked me to partake in a pre-clinical trial focussed on examining the efficacy of a growth factor developed by a pharmaceutical firm. My role was to conduct the biomechanical analyses on rabbit cartilage samples exposed to the growth factor and communicate the results to the client. After analysing the test and control samples, I graphed the results and a visual representation of the data showed a trend in support of the growth factor. However, the statistical test I ran was not significant implying that the growth factor added little benefit. When I shared the results with my advisor, he asked me to rework the statistics and show the data in a more positive light to the client.
My dilemma was whether to report the findings against the wishes of my advisor or to heed his request and use a less stringent and statistically incorrect test. Researchers often manipulate data by using alternative statistical tests, so complying with my advisor’s request would not be unusual. However, the results of this experiment would serve as fodder for future human clinical trials. I did not want to be burdened with the knowledge that my inaccurate presentation of the results could have negative downstream consequences for many.
In the end my convictions won out and I presented the data unchanged. Though initially disappointed, my professor appreciated my moral stand on the issue and instead of hurting our relationship it fostered greater confidence and