and has this official power that people should just do whatever he wants and attend to his every whim. Laurencia and the townsfolk show their covert power when they kill the commander in vengeance of Laurencia’s dishonor and all the offenses he has committed against them. In the end the covert power of the townsfolk win because when a judge is sent to punish someone for the crime they stick together. No one admits to the murder and everyone even when tortured all say the same thing “ Fuente Ovejuna did it”. They use their unofficial power to defeat the commander and to save themselves. Fuente Ovejuna was written during the Golden Age, a time where playwrights needed to follow specific guidelines and structure their plays in a certain way.
“To support verisimilitude, the Italians recommended that playwrights follow three unities – place, time, and action – in constructing their dramas. In brief, a play should occur in a single setting, its fictitious time should last no more than a single day, and its plot should encompass only one major action” (Zarrilli, 183). Playwright Lope De Vega was however was known for contributing to fix these norms of theatre. His plays were divided into three acts instead of five. He disregarded the unities of time and place, however, kept the unity of action in his performances. Lope also went against the Golden Age’s classical decorum by mixing elements of comic and tragedy. He defied decorum by having peasants appear on stage with nobles and even sometimes
royalty. Lope’s Fuenteovejuna does indeed push back against Golden Age values. The unities of time, place, and action were a very important aspect to theatre because at the time they wanted to keep it simple for the audiences, who the playwrights thought of as dumb. “ Educated scholars and aristocrats whose imaginations had been stretched and tested by books might be able to understand plays that violated verisimilitude, according to the sixteenth-century humanists, but the “ignorant multitude,” with only their “senses” to guide them, would be lost” (Zarrilli, 183). The Italians recommended the unity of place was important because the audience knew the stage was in front of them and could not really be changed to represent several different locations. To reach verisimilitude in the plays, they underestimated the imagination capabilities of the audience.