Preview

Overview of Supreme Court's Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556 (1883) Decision

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
852 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Overview of Supreme Court's Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556 (1883) Decision
Ex parte Crow Dog, 109 U.S. 556 (1883), is a decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that followed the death of one member of a Native American tribe at the hands of another on reservation land. Crow Dog was a member of the Brulé band of the Lakota Sioux. On August 5, 1881 he shot and killed Spotted Tail, a Lakota chief; there are different accounts of the background to the killing. The tribal council dealt with the incident according to Sioux tradition, and Crow Dog paid restitution to the dead man's family. However, the U.S. authorities then prosecuted Crow Dog for murder in a federal court. He was found guilty and sentenced to hang. The Supreme Court held that unless authorized by Congress, federal courts had no jurisdiction to try cases where the offense had already been tried by the tribal council.[1] Crow Dog was therefore released. The case led to the Major Crimes Act in 1885, which placed some major crimes (initially 7, now 15) under federal jurisdiction if committed by an Indian against another Indian on a reservation or tribal land. This case was the beginning of the plenary power legal doctrine that has been used in Indian case law to limit tribal sovereignty.
Contents [hide]
1 Background
1.1 Treaties and statutes
1.2 Murder of Spotted Tail
1.3 Trial
2 Opinion of the Court
3 Subsequent developments
3.1 Major Crimes Act of 1885
3.2 Tribal sovereignty
3.3 Plenary power doctrine
4 See also
5 Notes
6 References
7 External links
Background[edit]

map of Great Sioux Reservation

Great Sioux Reservation
Treaties and statutes[edit]
Crow Dog[fn 1] was a Brulé[fn 2] subchief who lived on the Great Sioux Reservation, in the part that is now the Rosebud Indian Reservation in south-central South Dakota on its border with Nebraska. The tribe had made several treaties with the United States, the most significant being the 1868 Treaty of Fort Laramie.[4] This treaty provided that Indians agreed to turn over those accused of crimes to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In July of 2000 Curtis Williams was indicted by a grand jury in Williamson County, Texas for aggravated assault causing serious bodily injury. While under indictment, Williams traveled to Louisiana from Texas on a Greyhound bus. The bus Williams was traveling on was scheduled to make a stop at the Shreveport Greyhound Bus terminal on September 12,…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Facts: A fire was evolved on September 23, 1981 in a log cabin due to a hot plate. The hot plate was left on with an accelerant and kerosene near by. The owner of the cabin, Henry Xavier Kennedy was convicted of Arson as he obtained an insurance policy for $40K on the cabin five days prior to this fire and police found evidence that the construction business owned by Mr. Kennedy was losing money, and Mr. Kennedy's alibi was insufficient to eliminate him as a suspect.…

    • 1597 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bibliography: miller, r. l. (2003). handbook of selected court cases, for gaines and millr 's criminal justice in action, 2nd edition. arlington: wadsworth thomson learning.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. This Supreme Court cases argues whether Brown (appellant) was validly convicted of refusing to comply with Police demands to stop and identify himself as it is a crime in the Texas Penal Code to deny identification on request when suspicion of crime has occurred. A violation of Texas Penal Code 38.02(a).…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Virginia on April 7th 2003 a divided United States Supreme Court opened the possibility of constitutionally restricting certain types of hate speech. The court was to hear a case that spoke to one specific Virginia state statute that prohibited cross burning with the intent to intimidate, and also rendered that any such burning shall be prima facie evidence of an intent to intimidate a person or group. This court would see this statute being used between two separate cases. The first case was against Barry Black; in August of 1998 Black led a Ku Klux Klan rally at which the conclusion resulted in the burning of a cross on private property with the permission of the owner. Black was charged under the state statute, “Burning a cross with the intent to intimidate.” [347] The jury was instructed in accordance with the Model Jury Instruction that the burning of the cross by itself is sufficient evidence from which you may infer the required intent. [364] In May 1998 Richard Elliot and Jonathan O’Mara attempted to burn a cross on the lawn of Elliot’s neighbor and were charged in accordance under the cross-burning statute. After all of the respondents were convicted, they appealed to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that the cross-burning statute is unconstitutional. The Virginia Supreme court reversed all the convictions holding that the Virginia cross-burning statute is analytically indistinguishable from the ordinance found…

    • 884 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The landmark case of McCulloch v. Maryland in 1819 unanimously ruled that the Constitution allowed Congress to establish the National Bank. The Court also asserted that the Constitution did not allow a state to tax the Bank. Chief Justice John Marshall stated that the Constitution does not explicitly grant Congress the right to establish a national bank, but also noted that the "necessary and proper" clause of the Constitution gives Congress the authority to do that which they felt was best for the country. Therefore, the Court affirmed the existence of implied powers.…

    • 565 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this case, Brown contends that he had a firm constitutional right to stand up and support Jennings if he so chose to. As with any Constitutional right, this right must be allowed except when it begins to interfere and infringe on the ability of educators to safely and effectively carry out their duties to other students. Brown v. Cabell, 598.…

    • 656 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In 1995, a South Carolina jury convicted and sentenced to death, petitioner, Bobby Lee Holmes, for the “murder, first-degree criminal sexual assault, first-degree burglary, and robbery,” of 86-year-old Mary Stewart. State v. Holmes, 320 S.C. 259, 262, 464 S.E. 2d 334, 336 (1995). The defendant sought to present evidence that another party committed the crimes for which he stood trial. Id. Holmes’ defense cited information from witnesses that the other party, Jimmy McCaw White, bragged about committing the crime, following the victim’s death. White denied this under oath, claiming an alibi, which other witnesses refuted. Additionally, the defense fervently argued police tainted forensic evidence with a sloppy investigation, and an attempt to frame the defendant for the murder. Holmes, v. South Carolina, (No. 04-1327), 361 S. C. 333, 605 S. E. 2d 19.…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Dred Scott decision of 1857 is one of the most famous Supreme Court decisions because it declared that slaves could never become citizens of the United States. The Court’s 6-3 decision stated that the Constitution could not protect blacks and “blacks had no rights which the white man was bound to respect.” Since slaves could never become citizens they had no right to sue and Dred Scott remained a slave. The courts reputation following this decision plummeted to an all time low in the North and now Republicans of the time viewed the court as controlled by the Slave Power.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the resolution of the Civil War, rich whites in the South scrambled to regain economic control and superiority. To prevent blacks and poor whites from joining together to challenge them, a series of Jim Crow laws that segregated blacks from whites were created (Cates 50). In this time, various legal decisions played instrumental roles in the transition to a heavily segregated south. Through the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court decision, the government legalized segregation which led to the establishment of myriad Jim Crow laws that stripped African Americans of their Constitutional rights.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The modern civil rights movement has been affected by three very important Supreme Court cases. The first infamous case was the Dred Scott v. Sanford decision which dreadfully took away the rights of African Americans. Then the case of Plessy v. Ferguson was held in 1896 which had a major impact on the civil rights movement. This case decided that African Americans were “separate but equal”. Then finally the last infamous case was the Board v. the Board of Education which overruled the case of Plessy v. Ferguson. These cases made a huge dent on the civil rights movement and the equality laws we have instilled today.…

    • 1025 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Brown V. Louisiana

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages

    During the 1960’s, many African-Americans believed that civil rights should become a national priority. Young civil rights activists brought their cause to the national stage and demanded the federal government assist them and help resolve the issues that plagued them. Many of them challenged segregation in the South by protesting at stores and schools that practiced segregation. Despite the efforts of these groups and Supreme Court rulings that ordered the desegregation of buses and bus stations, violence and prejudice against African-Americans in the South continued (Meyer, F.S., 1968).…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Battle at Wounded Knee

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Later on the Indians started to represent the “Ghost Dance” which brought fear to some of the US. They thought the Indians have gone crazy, and they needed to kill them for protection. The military took action by killing Sitting Bull on December 25th, and Big Foot was going to be the next one killed.…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Native American Oppression

    • 5989 Words
    • 24 Pages

    Tennant, B. (2011). “Excluding Indians not taxed” Dred Scott, Standing Bear, Elk and the legal status of Native Americans in the latter half of the nineteenth century. International Social Science Review, 86(1/2), 24-43.…

    • 5989 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    admin law

    • 13188 Words
    • 53 Pages

    It was seen in Chapter 1 that the High Court sets the limits of statutory substantive powers on any occasion when uncertainty about those limits has given rise…

    • 13188 Words
    • 53 Pages
    Powerful Essays