First, the sample size was small making it more difficult to have significant results. For our group specifically, the first time we ran the Logger Lite program, it stopped at a certain point due to the fact that we minimized the program, that increased the amount of the time that the fish were in the chamber. The procedure was not standardized, because the groups on the bench were calculating the behavior of the fish differently. As a group we decided to measure the behavior by the position of the goldfish in the four quadrants of the chamber, but when it came to measuring the behavior during the dark condition, the experimenter had to lift the cover for 5 seconds to be able to see the positioning of the fish which might have created some deviation in the reading. Therefore, in future studies I think it is important to standardize the way to measure the behavior to have more accurate
First, the sample size was small making it more difficult to have significant results. For our group specifically, the first time we ran the Logger Lite program, it stopped at a certain point due to the fact that we minimized the program, that increased the amount of the time that the fish were in the chamber. The procedure was not standardized, because the groups on the bench were calculating the behavior of the fish differently. As a group we decided to measure the behavior by the position of the goldfish in the four quadrants of the chamber, but when it came to measuring the behavior during the dark condition, the experimenter had to lift the cover for 5 seconds to be able to see the positioning of the fish which might have created some deviation in the reading. Therefore, in future studies I think it is important to standardize the way to measure the behavior to have more accurate