• Did not match the model you saw on display in the store or the picture on the box
• The screen was slightly damaged when you first took it out of the box
• Not able to make or receive calls periodically
• Not able to connect to the internet
• Not able to access the settings
• Switching itself off when making calls
• Getting extremely hot when it is on charge
There are laws to protect consumers against scenarios like this. These include SOGA (The Sale of Goods Act) and SOGASA (The Sale of Goods and Services Act). Also, there is the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008. These were all made to protect the consumer after purchasing faulty goods or services. Also, there were implied terms in the contract you made when purchasing the mobile telephone which were included in SOGA and SOGASA. Furthermore, the trading standards institute was set up in order to enforce legislation related to trading and to protect the consumer.
Did not match the model you saw on display in the store or the picture on the box
Section 13 SOGA states that where a sale is made by description the goods must correspond with the description given. If the phone did not match the model that you saw on display or the picture given on the box then this is breaching SOGA. As the purchase is breaching SOGA, you have the right to return the phone. Re Moore & Co v Landauer is a case example of where goods have been rejected because they weren’t as described. The claimant ordered 3,100 tins of peaches packed in cases of 30, however when they arrived they were packed in cases of 30. The claimant was able to reject them as they were not as described.
The screen was slightly damaged when you first took it out of the box
Section 14 SOGA states that when a sale is made the goods must be of satisfactory quality. If the screen was damaged then the phone was obviously not of satisfactory quality, and therefore your purchase is protected by SOGA. A case example of goods being rejected due to not being of satisfactory quality is Stevenson v Rogers; the claimant bought a fishing boat off the defendant, which he claimed was not of satisfactory quality. The defendant argued that he’s a fisherman not a boat salesman and so the sale was not in the course of business. The court decided that the sale was in the course of business and so the claimant was able to reject the boat.
Not able to make or receive calls periodically
Section 14 SOGA also states that when a sale is made the goods must be fit for purpose. If the phone is periodically not able to make or receive calls then the telephone you bought is obviously not fit for purpose. This is yet another reason as to why you are able to return the phone. Also, section 13 of SOGASA states that services carried out in the course of business must be carried out with reasonable care and skill. SOGA and SOGASA were being breached when the shop sold you a phone which cannot make or receive calls periodically.
Not able to connect to the internet
Section 14 SOGA states that when a sale is made the goods must be fit for purpose. If the phone is not able to connect to the internet then it is not fit for purpose.
Not able to access the settings
If the phone is not able to access the settings then this is in breach of section 13 of SOGA because it states that good must match the given description. In the description it was specified that the phone was able to access the settings. As such, you are able to return the phone.
Switching itself off when making calls
Section 14 SOGA also states that when a sale is made the goods must be fit for purpose. If the phone switches itself off when making calls then the telephone you bought is clearly not fit for purpose.
Getting extremely hot when it is on charge
The phone is clearly not of satisfactory quality if it’s getting extremely hot when it is on charge. This is breaching section 14 of SOGA.
References Used
11/11/2013 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54
11/11/2013 http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/protection
11/11/2013 http://whatconsumer.co.uk/consumer-protection-act/#axzz2kKh9GSwR
11/11/2013 http://www.cwgsy.net/private%2Fsljohn/FairTrading.htm
References: Used 11/11/2013 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1979/54 11/11/2013 http://www.oft.gov.uk/business-advice/treating-customers-fairly/protection 11/11/2013 http://whatconsumer.co.uk/consumer-protection-act/#axzz2kKh9GSwR 11/11/2013 http://www.cwgsy.net/private%2Fsljohn/FairTrading.htm
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Wally, business owner of Windy City Watches is located in downtown Chicago, IL. Business is booming and Wally needs to buy a large quantity of Rolek watches which sell for $50 apiece. He calls Randy Rolek, the wholesaler located in Milwaukee WI. They discuss terms on the phone for a while before coming to an agreement in which Wally offers to buy 100 watches for $25 each. Randy sends over an order form in which Wally states that he is agreeing to purchase watches from Randy for $25 each, but does not include the quantity in which he will buy. Randy sends 50 watches the following week with a note included stating that he has sent 50 watches and will send the other remaining 50 watches within a few days but includes the bill for the full 100 watches. Wally by this time changes his mind about buying the watches and offers to send back the 50 watches that were shipped and pay shipping expense, but will not be able to pay for any of the watches.…
- 682 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
6. What are 3 steps of cellular respiration? What are the products and reactants of each step?…
- 256 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Homer’s cost to complete construction was $110,000. In addition, he will also have a $20,000 cost to replace the fireplaces. A party is required to mitigate damages, but the law…
- 955 Words
- 3 Pages
Better Essays -
In this assignment I will be giving advice to Rick’s girlfriend on whether she has a legal right to return the laptop that Rick bought for her. I will be analysing whether a valid contract was formed and who it was formed with.…
- 1149 Words
- 5 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
No, Emerson is not liable. Emerson clearly stated that children should be kept away. In the owner’s…
- 385 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
To prevent loss of profits and disruption in the store we should introduce new measures such as more security in store. This could be useful as plain clothes guards and uniformed guards could patrol the store which could lower the theft levels. More cctv…
- 1859 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Rule : : Contract formation requires mutual assent (offer and acceptance), consideration, and no viable defenses to contract formation.…
- 812 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Millie contracted to sell Frank 10,000 bushels of corn to be grown on Millie’s farm. Due to a drought during the growing season, Millie’s yield was much less than anticipated, and she could deliver only 250 bushels to Frank. Frank accepted the lesser amount but sued Millie for breach of contract. Can Millie defend successfully on the basis of outcome impossibility of performance? Explain. Discuss the elements of impossibility of performance and the three situations where this defense can be used.…
- 292 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
If the goods do not meet any of these standards then the consumer is entitled to a full refund, reasonable compensation or repair and replacement of the goods.…
- 405 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The sales of goods act requires traders to sell goods that are as the described and advertised. The product must also be of satisfactory quality.…
- 923 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Duration is also important when drafting a contract because knowing how long someone will be bound to a commitment should be a priority.…
- 339 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Expensive mobile phone handsets are desirable items, and so unfortunately are at risk from theft. Children and young people may be particularly vulnerable to such crime.…
- 449 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
take the situation serious. A solution can be contacting cell phone carriers to put some type of…
- 1419 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays -
The respondent is unable to justify the violations of Section 8 and 10 of the canadian charter of rights and freedoms (charter) with regards to section 24 (2) of the charter. Section 24 (2) states that where in proceedings under section (1), a court concludes that evidence was obtained in a manner that did not infringe or deny any rights of freedoms guaranteed by the charter, the evidence shall not be excluded if it is established that, having regard to all the circumstances, the admission of it in the proceedings would bring the administration of justice into disrepute (charter).…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
· Any item found not correct or damaged in anyway should be returned as soon as possible and replaced by the supplier to avoid any unnecessary delays.…
- 2353 Words
- 10 Pages
Powerful Essays