Preview

Page V. Gulf Coast Motors

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
630 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Page V. Gulf Coast Motors
Case 14.2 – Page v. Gulf Coast Motors

Parties
Plaintiff: Gulf Coast Motors (The Company)
Defendant: Glenn A. Page and Mary R. Page
Glen A Page and Jerry Sellers, the owner of Gulf Coast were friends.

Facts

Glenn A. Page was friend for a long time of Jerry Sellers, an owner of Gulf Coast Motors. Glenn began borrowing money from Gulf Coast Motors on a regular basis for two years. There was no formal loan process. Glenn would sign a ledger where it was written “I agree to pay Jerry Sellers as above”. Glenn made some small payments towards his account attempting to reduce or pay the balance. At the time the money was borrowed Glenn was not working so he had not assets in his own name. Gathered evidence showed that Glenn had a gambling issue. Sellers testified that at the end of the two year period, Mary R. Page, Glenn’s wife orally guaranteed to repay Glenn’s loans. Mary on the contrary had significant assets of her own. Mary denied that she had promised to pay Glenn’s debt. Gulf Coast Motors sued Glenn and his wife Mary to recover payment for the unpaid loans. (Cheeseman, H. Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues (7th ed). Pearson Learning Solutions)

Procedure
The Court ruled in favor of Gulf Coast Motor entering a judgment in the amount of $23.020. Mary appealed.
Issue
The issue here turns into a simple question: was Mary’s oral promise to guarantee Glenn’s debts an enforceable contract?
Holding
After a close examination of the facts and evidence the court held that the oral promise made by Mary to guarantee her husband debt did not represent an enforceable guarantee contract. Thus Mary won the case.
Reasoning
The reasoning of the court is that the status of fraud forbids any promise to pay the debt of another unless it is put in writing, therefore since Gulf Coast failed in providing the evidence of a signed note by Mary promising to pay Glenn’s debts, the agreement stays within the statute



References: Cheeseman, H. Business Law: Legal Environment, Online Commerce, Business Ethics, and International Issues (7th ed). Pearson Learning Solutions. Retrieved from http://devry.vitalsource.com/books/9781256088080/id/ch14box16 Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama. (2004, December 30). Retrieved from FindLaw for Legal Professionals: http://caselaw.findlaw.com/al-court-of-civil-appeals/1245441.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dean Witter, Inc. wins with the decision of the Tenth Court of Appeals to reverse the District Court…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    FACT: In this case both sides of the party have very good statements and facts that either hold them responsible or not hold them responsible. When it comes to the defendant Mervin Hyland, he says that during the whole time the two promissory notes were being conducted he was incapacitated through the use of liquor when he signed the note. When it comes to the plaintiff First state bank of Sinai, they stated that he signed a promissory note and sent a check for $900 to pay for interest on the note.…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gagnon V Coombs Summary

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Simultaneously, both, Mr. Gagnon and his daughter Joan were not aware of each other’s actions up until Mr. Gagnon signed the contract to sell the farm. However, Joan being an agent while POA was active, had an obligation to inform Mr. Gagnon of any material changes. Conveying the Shelburne farm to her trust was definitely a material transfer and by failing to notify her father, she violated her duty of loyalty. That is a breach number one and secondly, Joan needed to realize that her authority to arrange for the Shelburne property had been revoked when she found out that Mr. Gagnon had a contract to sell it. Therefore, Mr. Francis, should be official owner of the Shelburne, who would have rights to void transaction created by Joan Coombs and recovery the property to…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Plaintiff Wendling

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Plaintiff Wendling was originally awarded damages for the breach of an oral contract for the purchase and sale of cattle to the Defendants Puls and Watson by the Harvey District Court; which the Defendants turned around and later appealed. Both of the Defendants argued that the oral contract was unenforceable by law and the damages were also not calculated correctly.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    United States

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Answer: The promise Presley made to pay the mortgage was not enforceable. If the Alden had received it in writing, then would it be enforceable due to the fact that it was written, agreed upon and signed. However, this was not the case.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The amount of loss due to theft can be proved with the written agreement in which Dan agrees to pay Keith the $30,000 over a five year period plus 14% interest per annum on the unpaid balance. In Michael Monteleone, 34 T.C. 688 (1960) the IRS commissioner argued that the loss sustained was a nonbusiness bad debt and not a casualty loss. Although there is a bona fide debtor-creditor relationship between Keith and Dan the loan is not considered a nonbusiness bad debt since Dan falsely, fraudulently, and deceitfully represented that the money would be invested and repaid.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Unit 9 Paper

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Theresa Metzger appeals from an order entered by the Superior Court of Clayton County granting partial summary judgment to Americredit Financial Services, Inc. on her claim for conversion based on the alleged wrongful repossession of her vehicle. Metzger contends that the superior court erred by failing to conclude that she took her vehicle free of Americredit's security interest under the special good faith purchaser rule for goods covered by a certificate of title set forth in OCGA § 11-9-337(1). We agree and reverse.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There did not come into existence a valid written contract or contracts binding upon plaintiff and defendant there is no basis upon which to consider plaintiff’s claims for equitable relief or defendant’s affirmative defenses in opposition thereto. Specifically, therefore, I make no findings as to the issues of fraud and deceit, or any other of the equitable issues raised by defendant’s affirmative defenses.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    26.3)Redemption Elmer and Arletta Hans, husband and wife, owned a parcel of real property in Illinois. They borrowed $100,000 from First Illinois National Bank (First Illinois) and executed a note and mortgage to First Illinois, making the real estate security for the loan. The security agreement authorized First Illinois to take possession of the…

    • 1724 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Blaustein V. Burto Brief

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issue: Was there a contract, and if there was, did the defendants breached that contract and confidential relationship, and unjustly received enrichment from such breach?…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dred Scott Thesis Statement

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages

    2. If the Circuit Court had jurisdiction, was the judgment given in error or not?…

    • 3235 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Case Study

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The District Court that initially handled the lawsuit determined that the violation made by Carlisle was a “bona fide” error and sided with Carlisle stating the act was not intentional resulting in judgment in favor of the defendant. The lawsuit was appealed by Jerman and escalated to The Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, who affirmed The District Court’s decision. The appeal was decided in favor of the defendant and no damages were rewarded to the plaintiff.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    FACTS Rumarson Technologies, Inc. (RTI) sued Robert and Percy Helmer to collect from them personally $24,965 owed to it by Event Marketing, Inc. (EMI) when EMI's check to pay RTI bounced. Robert and Percy Helmer were authorized signatories on EMI's corporate account, and they signed the check. RTI argued that as signatories they could be held personally liable. The lower court agreed and ruled in favor of RTI holding the Helmers liable. The Helmers appealed. Also of note, is that check was dated 1998 although there is some non-material dispute as to whether it was August 14, 1998, or on or around July 13, 1998.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Traco vs Arrow

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The court affirmed the judgment of the lower court in favor of appellee subcontractor, finding that promissory estoppel was a viable cause of action in a bid construction case. The court found that the award of damages based on this theory was factually supported by the evidence, and that there was statutory authority for the award of attorneys' fees. The determination of the rate of prejudgment interest also was proper.…

    • 565 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eleven months after moving into the home, Pat received the half-million dollar installment check. Pat immediately went to Dan with a check for $275,000 and asked Dan to convey the property to her according to their agreement. Dan refused to accept the check and ordered Pat to move out.…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays