Paine's Relationship With The English Government

Paine’s view of human nature depends on the relationship between the elected leaders and the electors who put them there. The elected leaders duties’ were to work with the best interest of the citizens in mind and these two groups have to work together, “mutually and naturally to support each other” (Paine 6). This will then determine the efficiency and need for government and whether the people will support the elected leaders. The need for government, overall, depends on the cooperation (and good human nature) of the elected officials and their constituents.
Paine finds many flaws with the English government. The first flaw that Paine believed is that a monarchy does not guarantee freedom of state. The second flaw Paine stated is that the three powers in England were not in agreement and not constantly checking each other. The third flaw is that the King needs to have checks and balances, and that the King does not have absolute power. Finally, Paine explained is that the common people may have more competence than the king himself, and that this can go both ways, as the groups are constantly checking each other. The final reason he states is that the King should not be allowed to make absolute decisions over everyone. Overall, Paine believed that the English Government had
For example, when Great Britain has a conflict with a potential American ally, America must get involved and side with Great Britain. Paine fears that this will harm America’s relationship with possible European allies. Paine also believes that America can thrive on its own, as many countries need them for trade, and does not need Great Britain as an ally. He strongly believes that America’s connection with Europe will be impacted by their relationship/connection with Great Britain if they do not try and terminate this