Preview

Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1063 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Paley's Argument For The Existence Of God
God has always been an abstract subject for me. Throughout the entirety of my life I have never had a clear understanding of what God is, or even if there is a God. However, even though I never had a clear understanding of God or how we could even know of him, Descartes and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However, David Hume would refute these claims saying, through his dialogues that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that …show more content…
He argues that something cannot begin from nothing, like a rock it is made from things with all the proper components. The same is true for man and all existence; he could not be from nothing, but rather from the first efficient cause, which is God. By this argument Descartes is saying that since we have a certain idea of infinity, then that means that this idea must have been caused by a thing that exists in reality. Since we have this idea Descartes thinks that it could not have arisen through humans because we are finite, therefore the existence of God is true because we have this idea and it could not have arisen from us. Hume would argue that this is indeed untrue his character Cleanthes states that nothing that is distinctively conceivable implies a contradiction. Whatever we conceive to exist, we can also conceive to not exist. Therefore there is no being whose existence implies a contradiction. In this Cleanthes says that nothing can surely exist, for example, if I see a chair I can also conceive that chair not to exist even though it does, because I can do this denying the existence of something does not imply a contradiction. Therefore, to say that God is not the efficient cause because he does not exist is a valid claim. Furthermore Philo states that the universe could be ordered in a manner similar to mathematics, which does not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is one prevailing question we ask ourselves consistently, “Does God exist?” Every human answer’s that question in their own unique way, which is contingent upon their beliefs, experiences, and influences. The existence of God was significantly debated among philosophers during the 18th and 19th centuries and each esteemed philosopher had a distinct argument explaining their rationale, while criticizing another’s. In this paper, I will analyze William Paley’s argument, “The Teleological Argument,” and how it is disparaged by David Hume and his argument for apparent…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    At the outset of the nineteenth century in Britain, religious faith and the study of the sciences tended to exist in harmony with each other. The study of God’s Word, in the Bible, and His Works, in nature, were assumed to be two versions of the same ultimate truth.1 When William Paley published Natural Theology; or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity in 1802, he reinforced the concept of a designing God after positing that natural objects show evidence of design, emphasizing nature as God’s creation.2…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    chp 5 Dr.Beckers book

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages

    After briefly introducing the concept of revelation within Christian theology, this chapter first explores the problem of talking about God in our secular world, particularly about the objections to God-talk, especially from the atheistic position. The chapter then proceeds to discuss what Christian theologians call "the general revelation of God." This type of revelation is based on the natural knowledge of God which is generally or universally available to all human beings. The chapter investigates various objections to such knowledge, most especially those within atheistic critiques of both religion and God. The chapter then describes the principal positions that Christian theologians have taken regarding the possibility of a natural knowledge of God.…

    • 18144 Words
    • 73 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    To explain cleric Paley's creationism lets open with his argument, he said that things are so perfectly set up that it has to be a designer behind it, this is the core essence of creationism. It is understood in this belief that a sequence of random events can not allow the scenery we live in, where the planet rotate around the sun just perfectly for us to not die, or how we have everything to survive at the hands of nature. That is to say, all this it is thought as an intelligent design executed by a grand architect, God. This faith is not only promoted by the countless coincidences we live in but also it is also supported by the inexplicable complexity that things are made. For instance, we know that living organisms are made of cells,…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The essence of the main argument in the fourth Meditation of Descartes is to establish that there is a difference between God: his creator and himself, and how this difference does not taint the infinite abilities of God. Descartes commences his argument by first establishing his idea of being a thinking being. In his previous book, The Discourse on Method and Meditations on First Philosophy he sates,…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although he does not direct the argument considered in this paper against any one philosopher or school of thought, in the Principles of Philosophy he presents his understanding of substance as antithetical to that of the Scholastics, who believed that substance applied univocally to God and creatures. As his understanding of substance is essential to this argument, the difference is reflected throughout it as well. While for Scholastic thinkers the human being was essentially a hylomorphic substance, Descartes posits that the mind and body thought to make up a human being are in fact distinct substances, and the human essence is tied more closely with the mind…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: Paley vs. Hume and the existence of a higher being Criticism of religious theories and practices is clearly valid and necessary. After all, what caused Jesus’s crucifixion was likely his disapproval of the resistance against his practices and beliefs. Accordingly, religious criticism is certainly more effective if it is respectful rather than dismissiveness, as it has the potential to elicit meaningful dialogue. While some claim that we come from cells that evolved into organisms, others argue that humans are primitive, and that science poses a better explanation to evolution than a fictional higher being. The argument of the former, however, is that if the earth came from a cell, that cell had to come from somewhere…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Proslogion” Anselm argues God as the greatest conceivable being that exists in reality. In this essay, I will show that Anselm’s ontological argument is sound and his conclusion logically follows from his premises. I will consider an objection towards Anselm’s definition of God and show that it is unconvincing and flawed. The objection against Anselm’s ontological argument that I will consider will be one brought up by a contemporary of Anselm, Gauinilo.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Most people observe the world and conclude that there is no doubt an order and design. One such believer was philosopher William Paley, an 18th century English clergymen who concluded that there was an intelligent design of the universe and thus must exist an intelligent designer. Now a commonly used term amongst theologists and philosophers, intelligent design refers to the belief that certain features of the universe can best be explained by a higher cause. While an orderly universe created for man-kind may be the more popular and optimistic opinion, I see disorder and chaos every where I look. From early on in life, I have always seen the world as a place that needs structure brought to it, not something with an innate organization. My color…

    • 1455 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The question of whether there is a God has been debated by many philosophers, religious experts, and even your average citizens. Many of those people have attempted to argue why God is or is not real. This paper is going to present two different arguments by the philosophers: Robin Collins and William Rowe. The first argument by Collins is an argument for the existence of God, who designed our incredibly complex universe. The explanation of Collin’s argument will be followed by Rowe’s argument against the existence of God, which is in relation to intense suffering that exists in this world. With those two arguments at hand, the question is, are the conclusions compatible?…

    • 1407 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes states that he is certain that he is a thinking think. All thinking beings have ideas. These ideas must have a starting point, a place that these ideas were formed, that these ideas came from. Descartes then continues to explain that although people can be deceived by their senses and their ideas, why would God allow us to be deceived by our senses? For it is this God that has given us these senses and has given us this Earth. If the existence of God is false, then how do we know if we are truly being deceived? This matter of deception is something that Descartes constantly relates back too. He does this in order to provide a starting point so that he can then use deductive reasoning to reach a conclusion. Descartes claims that the cause of an idea must have at least as much formal reality as the idea has objective reality (formal reality meaning what something actually is and objective reality meaning how that something appears to us using our sense). Descartes explains how he, and us, all have an idea of God in our minds. This idea must have come from somewhere. This he explains using deductive reasoning. We have an idea of God, let A represent this idea, and we can say that the actual God can be represented using B. The idea of God (A) must be caused by something, which is at least as perfect or real as the actual God (B). The…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Cartesian Circle

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At first glance, it seems that Descartes has blatantly committed a logical fallacy, leaving his argument entirely defenseless. However, if it were be possible to disprove one of his two premises, any notions of circularity would be dissolved, legitimizing Descartes’ proof. The first defense takes a deeper look into Descartes’ writings in order to disprove his first premise, that God is an essential and necessary component for the formation of knowledge from a perception.…

    • 911 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes, R, Murdoch, D. & Cottingham, J.The philosophical writings of Descartes, Volume 2. Reprint. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1985.…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Ontological Argument

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Through the ontological argument, Anselm seeks to prove that God exists and he attempts to refute the fool who says in his heart that there is no God. This fool has two important characteristics: he understands the claim that God exists and he does not believe that God exists. Gaunilo plays the role of the “fool” and challenges Anselm’s ontological argument. I will argue that Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is not adequate because it does not address the issue of certainty, which plays an important role in Gaunilo’s objection. First, I will explain, in greater depth, Anselm’s ontological argument. I will then elaborate on why Gaunilo denies that than which nothing greater can be conceived exists in the understanding. Lastly, I will argue why Anselm’s response to Gaunilo’s attack is insufficient.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Descartes and the first author both seem to dispute the argument made by the…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays