Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Parallel Situations Drawn Between King Lear and Gloucester

Good Essays
673 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Parallel Situations Drawn Between King Lear and Gloucester
In what ways does Shakespeare draw parallel situations between King Lear and Earl of Gloucester, and how are the characters similar in the play (specifically Act 1)?

While examining Lear and Gloucester, there are obvious similarities, such as that they are both of an older generation with evident power and authority. Both have children wishing to overthrow them through mendacity and false assurance. These two characters relate in a much more symbolic way that reveals insight into their foolishness and naïve sense of entitlement. Lear and Gloucester are symbolically blind to the fact that their children wish to acquire their power for selfish purposes. Edmund, Gloucester’s son without a mother, falsifies his commitment to his half-brother, Edward, when he says “I hope for my brother’s justification, he wrote this but as an essay of my taste of my virtue,” (Act 1 Scene 2) and Goneril, Lear’s daughter, has him believe she genuinely loves him when she says “Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter,” (Act 1 Scene 1). These instances lead to Lear and Gloucester’s imprudent decisions to act on matters that deserve more substantial evidence. “Gloucester reacts exactly like Lear, displacing his favor onto an unworthy recipient” (Storozynsky). Neither can see their children for who they truly are, which make it seems as if they the necessities to make rational decisions, hence being “blind”.

When considering the underlying characteristics of Lear and Gloucester, the audience can see two men, who are delusional with power, insecure and illogical. Their uncertainties stem from their children, who they love, but are quick to turn against. Lear turns against Cordelia because she refuses to discuss her love for him and Gloucester, for potentially having a preexisting fear that his children wanted him gone so they could have his power, believes that Edward wants him dead. “The old men inhabit worlds created by the mind and emotions, but which share some of the features of their actual surroundings: isolation, heights and depths, enclosures and open, empty places,” (Storozynsky). This author compares them to empty places and isolation, which is symbolic of their personality. Neither seems to be relatable to the audience, due to them not having any admirable traits. Both seem to be shallow characters that lack the confidence that a man of power should carry with him.

Lear and Gloucester both use the word “nothing” frequently in the play and this has a symbolic attachment to it. We see Lear use the phrase “nothing will come of nothing” (Act 1 Scene 1) while addressing his dissatisfaction with Cordelia. This provides insight into his shallowness because the audience is able to see that Lear expects to be verbally showered with praise. The irony is that Goneril and Regan’s flattering’s lack authenticity and are the true statements that mean “nothing”. Gloucester’s use of the word comes during his conversation with Edmund. He notices Edmund hiding a letter and says, “The quality of nothing hath not need to hide itself.” (Act 1 scene 2) Gloucester, like Lear, finds himself gullible to false pretenses. This nothingness they speak of is something that they are displacing onto other people, when in fact, they should be self-assessing themselves for. Their ignorance and assumptive attitudes reflects the reason as to why their personalities are hollow and self-fulfilling.

Through Act 1, the audience gets insight into the dramatic irony that is evident in both parallel situations. However, there are four more Acts to King Lear. The newer generations of greedy rulers (Goneril, Regan and Edmund) are expecting to cast out the older generation Lear and Gloucester. Lear, while talking to the fool, realizes that he may have made a mistake by handing down his power to his daughters. He is worried about his mental health when he says, “O, let me not be mad, not mad sweet heaven!” This is a foreshadowing of events to come in the book. Due to the parallel situations that Gloucester and Lear are in, both will continue to spiral down a path of chaos and ignorance.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. In this first scene of the play, how does Shakespeare establish the parallels between the stories of Lear and his daughters on the one hand and the story of Gloucester and his sons on the other hand?…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare in Lear, presents the notion that characters in great authority force suffering upon others in an effort to retain power, admiration, and status. Initially, Lear himself demonstrates this, appallingly treating Cordelia with an irrational snap judgement when he is embarrassed in court by his youngest daughters silence and lack of praise; “Here I disclaim all my parental care.” (1:1:107) This unjust sentence is highly ironic, especially for the audience, as dramatically we see transparent farce of Gonerill and Regan’s dedications of love, and the total truth of Cordelia’s. Due to the “infirmity of his age” (1:1:284) (Lear) the unjust pain Cordelia endures for his mistake is greatened, and due to this dramatic irony the audience is forever hopeful for some form of justice and resolution to come.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ageism in king Lear

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Gloucester observes disastrous events occurring in the play, most notably the ones occurring in the kingdom. He notes that love can never last, friendships eventually break up, and brothers become enemies which eventually leads to chaotic behavior. Ultimately, these malicious acts break out into devastating events such as civil wars, the bond breaking between father and son, and lastly the betrayal of King Lear and his noble power. In addition to all of these spiteful acts, it is evident that ageism is also portrayed in the play about the King himself, especially at the end of scene one. The first sign of how ageism begins in the first act is King Lear’s debatable decision to divide up the kingdom between his three daughters, Goneril, Regan and Cordelia. Eventually, Lear’s unwise decision causes chaos and havoc throughout the family, leading to multiple conflicts such as the banishment of Cordelia and the insulting comments about Lear’s old age and judgement.…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lear and Gloucester are similar because they both had a high status. Gloucester is a duke and Lear is a king. They both had a long beard, the beard could symbolize the significance of intelligent or the age is getting older. They both had a bad son or daughter caused them has nothing. Gloucester lost power and his mind because Edmund frames Edgar, this effected he can believe in nobody .Lear lost his power, Cordelia and Kent. Lear believes in Cordelia 's siblings lies even he didn't need that hundred soldiers, so there are no one besides him…

    • 522 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The sequence of oppositional characters and motifs in the play bring about in the audience a sense of the corruption of principles that beset the protagonists of the play. With this sense of opposition comes a strong sense of the duality within the play seemingly centred on the Epodoclean theory of a “world governed by the contrary forces of love and hate.” Though this is not unusual for a stage production, McAlindon believes that when the bond of opposites that constitutes the natural order of “revolt against limit and fly to extremes.” This can be seen in the characters foremost as the sons of Gloucester as well as the daughters of Lear are directly opposed to each other. Indeed it is in the internal nature of Lear that this is focused most powerfully as his beliefs in love and kindnesses are offset by the egocentric and chloric feelings that dwell within his heart. It is mainly from the character and fate of Lear that the true extent of the breakdown of nature can be seen as within the space of two weeks he has sunk from kingship to a world of destitution and poverty as he suffers at “th’ extreme verge” in his relationship with his family. What is most tragic in relation to Lear though is his rediscovery of Cordelia before the heart wrenching death she endures as he is thrown from the heights of grief before his heart gives way under the strain of ecstatic joy. But while the emotional converses that Lear endures are tremendously powerful they are not the only…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The infamous playwright, William Shakespeare’s, King Lear relays the story of a tragic hero and his family while paralleling it to the sub-plot within the tragedy. The story of these two reflecting groups of characters displays the obliteration of once potent characters’ power, and the inversion of social order. King Lear, the father of Goneril, Regan and Cordelia experiences a digressing journey comparable to that of Gloucester, the father of Edmund, his illegitimate son, and Edgar. Both Lear and Gloucester make a reprehensible decision in confiding in their children that they thought were the most honorable, but were faced with…

    • 2231 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since Regan and Goneril have had their chance to speak, Lear’s third and youngest daughter, Cordelia, is called upon to tell her father how much she loves him. Cordelia says that she can’t describe her love for her father; she feels that her love for her father is too deep put into words, and she does not want to attempt to explain it: “Unhappy that I am, I cannot heave / My heart into my mouth. I love your majesty / According to my bond, no more nor less,” (I.I.91-93). Since King Lear is blind to the truth and can only understand what he sees or hears, Lear becomes angry at Cordelia because he assumes that if she can’t describe her love for him, she doesn’t love him. He then orders Cordelia "out of [his] sight," because she is “ungrateful”, and his advisor, Kent, tells him: "See better, Lear," (I.I.179, 181). Lear then rewards Regan and Goneril with the honor of ruling his kingdom. From the beginning of the play, almost everyone sees Lear’s ignorance and the way he avoids seeing the truth; everyone except for Lear. Eventually, Regan and Goneril take over the kingdom and kick out their father. At this point, Lear starts to realize that his daughters had tricked him out of his kingdom; his sight is becoming more clear.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Parallel Points

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The emotional effect is heightened in King Lear with Shakespeare’s use of a subplot that mirrors the father-child relationships, the corruption of political power, and the death of the protagonist in the main plot. The subplot of Gloucester, Edmund, and Edgar in King Lear serves three main purposes. The main plot is the betrayal of King Lear by his two elder daughters, to whom he abdicates his power, during the first part of the play. The subplot is the similar story of the betrayal of the Earl of Gloucester by his illegitimate son Edmund. In both cases, the other victim of the conniving children is the one child who was truly faithful to the father: Cordelia in the case of the king Lear and Edgar in the case of Gloucester. Both betrayals occur because the fathers foolishly believe their sinister children who trick them into believing that their good-hearted siblings are the villains.…

    • 892 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    It first became clear that Shakespeare's King Lear and Laurence's Hagar Shipley were similar main characters when their personalities were developed with flaws. King Lear was immediately revealed as an imperfect character when he was shown in his somewhat conflicting roles as a father and a king. After resolving to divide his kingdom amongst his three daughters Lear develops a way to decide how his power and land will be divided. Looking to his three children Lear probes, "Tell me, my daughters/ (Since now we will divest us both of rule,/ Interest of territory, cares of state),/ Which of you shall we say doth love us most?/ That we our largest bounty may extend/ Where nature doth with merit challenge."(I.i.49-54) It is at this point in the play that King Lear…

    • 1904 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the end of the play, Lear and Cordelia’s relationship has a turning point. Lear is grieving Cordelia’s execution, finally seeing her love for him. Cordelia had respected the “King” as one should. Her feelings towards him are the typical orderly fashion of a king’s daughter. Lear’s realization of his respectful daughter and evil daughters put things back into order. Another example of an attempt to keep things in order is when Edgar goes into disguise to try to prevent Gloucester’s suicide on the cliff. This was done to further prevent Edmund gaining Gloucester’s title, which would put things out of…

    • 1676 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    stories of Lear and his daughters on the one hand and the story of Gloucester and his sons…

    • 1445 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reality and Illusion

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages

    King Lear’s personal rashness and initial inability to effectively judge peoples’ character leads to his eventual decent into madness. He is flattered easily by his elder daughters Goneril and Regan but banishes Cordelia who is the only one who truly loves her father. Often in this play it is the good characters that are forced…

    • 4107 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    King Lear Subverts

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages

    His goals throughout the play is to receive land and power, but also receive love and recognition by his father. Gloucester's rejection of Edgar is unnatural because Edgar is the "legitimate" son, while Edmund is not. Gloucester states "I never got him"(King Lear 2.1.79), which is Gloucester stating that Edgar was never his son anyway, and Edmund is a "loyal and natural boy"(King Lear 2.1.85). The detrimental effects of this reversal is that Edgar is cast out of the castle and loses everything he once had, and now Edmund the bastard son receives all the things that were not once originally his, which in this case is against the natural order, because Gloucester was manipulated by Edmund because of his desires to have…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    King Lear Research Paper

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It is known that children learn how to communicate by observing their parents. If the parents are effective communicators, it is most likely that their children will be as well. The same goes for if the parents communicate negatively (Long I). One of the effects of negative communication between parent and child is behavioral problems. Children who feel as though they cannot communicate properly tend to lash out (Wymbs). These facts could point to what caused the retaliation against Lear and Gloucester. Perhaps it could be due to the fact that there were no mother figures represented in the story. During this period in history the duties of the parents were divided the father offered economical support, where as the mother coddled and cared for her children. It is safe to assume that even though the mother was absent, Lear and Gloucester did not adopt the motherly duties. The two men were very important and probably were too busy to physically interact with their children. Not to mention both men probably wouldn’t be too fond of performing “ womanly duties” due to the fact that they are both hyper-masculine characters. This lack of physical contact can be extremely detrimental to an infant. The effects range from unstable hormonal levels to difficulty recognizing one’s own self (Harmon). This could very well be the case when it…

    • 1237 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gloucester, much like King Lear, misjudges his children and chooses to side with the one who is least loyal. Before he became part of King Lear 's court, Gloucester was an adulterer and conceived a son, Edmund, out of wedlock. Edmund is so angry about his illegitimate status that he becomes bitter and plots against his brother by making it look as though Edgar tries to kill him and their father. Edmund obviously longs for a higher status in the kingdom because of how people of a higher hierarchy are viewed. The irony of this is that Shakespeare writes this theme into the play as it mimics real life. "Distinctions within the aristocracy and, more importantly, between aristocrats and commoners are enforced, both on stage and in public, through performance" (Spotswood, 265). Edgar is forced to leave the kingdom so that he is not killed. But the division of this family does not stop Edgar from staying loyal to his father. Through the years, he disguises himself so he can keep in touch with his father. "In their disguises, their imaginations, and their degraded condition, they reflect the sufferings of the weakest in their society" (Selden 145). Edgar stays by his fathers…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays