Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

parliament frq

Good Essays
642 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
parliament frq
FRQ

England developed a Parliamentary monarchy that shaped future political development in Europe. Beginning with the succession of James I up through the Glorious Revolution, the role of Parliament in English Politics underwent considerable changes, such as being disregarded by the king of "divine right," James I and his son Charles I, then completely dissolved under the military dictatorship of Oliver Cromwell, and finally restored after James II was forced to abdicate his throne and William of Orange assumed his place. Throughout these different stages, Parliament's power and control over English politics varied greatly depending upon the ruler in power. James I's belief in "divine right" of kings, which meant God had chosen him to be ruler, led him not to rely on Parliament. Rather than depend on Parliament, James I and his successor, Charles I looked for other ways to acquire funds such as illegally levying taxes. Parliament was rarely called on during this period. In response to Charles illegal taxation, Parliament passed the Petition of Right which stated that, to pass any law the ruler must consent to Parliament. In order to continue ruling without Parliament, Charles used Ship Money to collect taxes as revenue. He might have been able to rule indefinitely without Parliament if not for his religious policies which provoked war with Scotland and forced Charles to call Parliament into session. This session, known as the Long Parliament was determined to limit the power of the king. It resolved that Parliament would meet at least every three years. Parliament later split with Charles I and declared war on him. Both James I and Charles I fought to suppress Parliament during their reigns and claimed absolute power due to the "divine right" of kings. After the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell governed under a military dictatorship. He removed all Presbyterians from Parliament which created a Rump Parliament that voted to execute Charles and abolish the monarchy. Cromwell was frustrated by the pettiness and dawdling of Parliament. When the House of Commons attempted to disband his expensive army, Cromwell responded by disbanding Parliament all together. He wanted to create a political structure to replace that of monarch and Parliament but failed and by the time of his death, the English were ready to end the republican political experiments and return to their traditional institutions. Cromwell's military dictatorship resulted negatively for Parliament which was disbanded during his rule. After the death of Cromwell, the monarchy was restored under Charles II and the Cavalier Parliament was formed. The reign of Charles II's brother, James II, who's goal was absolutism, faced united opposition. When he gave birth to a Catholic son, members of Parliament formed an alliance and invited William of Orange and James I's daughter, Mary to invade England and preserve the parliamentary government. They chased James out of power without any bloodshed, an event that came to be known as the Glorious Revolution. William and Mary were then declared joint rulers and recognized the Bill of Rights which limited the power of the monarchy and affirmed Parliament's right to make laws and levy taxes. With the Bill of Rights recognized during the rule of William and Mary, Parliaments power, which had constantly been suppressed, was finally restored. The Parliamentary government developed in England laid the foundation for subsequent political progress in Europe. Parliament's role in English politics went through various stages between the reign of James I and the Glorious Revolution. First it was ignored during the reign of James I and Charles I, both believers in the “Divine Right” of kings, then fully disbanded by Oliver Cromwell who governed through a military dictatorship, and finally restored by the Bill of Rights recognized by Mary and William. Parliament held different degrees of power and control over English politics throughout these various stages, depending largely on the ruler in power.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Charles I did not go along with the parliament. He took a serious hit during his 22 years as king. He began to give into extra parliamentary resorts such as, new tariffs and duties and collection of discontinued taxes. This angered the parliament as taxes were being illegally collected for an already unfortunate war and one that involved France…

    • 637 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When King Charles I dismissed Parliament in 1629, he was set on the idea of a personal rule without any help from Parliament. This he could manage, as long as he avoided war. His aim was to sort out the country's finances, and with the help of Strafford and Laud, impose a 'Policy of Thorough'. This policy was the idea of a fair and paternalistic government with no corruption. However, within 11 years, Charles' personal rule had failed and England was drifting into war. There are mixed opinions on whether this failure was solely due to the actions of the King, or those of third parties, for example, Strafford or Laud.…

    • 1052 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In January 1649, King Charles I was executed after being charged with high treason due to political and religious reasons, some of which contributed to his refusal in accepting the peace settlements given to him by Parliament. Charles’ refusal to compromise was supported by the division that had emerged within Parliament on how to fight the civil war between the Political Presbyterians and Political Independents. The main factors of the failure to reach a settlement were religion, politics, Charles’ intransigence, the New Model Army and the emergence of radical ideas; all of which eventually concluded to Charles’ execution.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Charles’s led the country without calling parliament for 11 years from 1629 – 1640. He initiated personal rule for many reasons. Firstly his close relationship with Buckingham alienated Parliament and caused resentment by Parliament. Secondly Charles had very strong believed in divine right and therefore saw no need for Parliament. Furthermore Charles religious policy’s led many to believe of a Catholic Conspiracy, which further distanced the King from Parliament. Lastly the King wasn’t getting substantial financial help from Parliament and decided that he would try and raise the finance without him.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nineteen Propositions

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    King Charles On January 4 1642 arrested five members of the commons John Pym, John Hampden, Denzil Holles, William Strode, Sir Arthur Hesilrige, and one Lord named Mandeville. So in March Parliament passed the Militia Ordinance which you did not have to get say from the King so Parliament could select whoever they wanted to be Lord and deputy. The King power started to become limited. Parliament sent out a letter called Nineteen Propositions to the king which was a list of things that Parliament wanted to have control fully or as equally as the king and King Charles denied it. So both the Parliament and King got ready for war. Around the middle of 1642 people started flocking towards the king some of the people who opposed him started to join…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Parliament and the army were divided between Presbyterians and Independents, the Independents were able to forcefully create a Rump Parliament and proceeded to give Charles I the death sentence. After Oliver Cromwell’s death, the newest threats…

    • 160 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As is suggested in Source 12, ‘[Elizabeth] had to turn to parliament for assistance’ during much of her reign to fund wars which gave Parliament quite significant control over her policies. This realisation for parliament marked the beginning of an era of difficulties for monarchs and their parliaments. It can further be derived from Source 12 that ‘[parliament] used her need of [funds] to make their views known’. Parliament’s consistent use of this throughout James’ reign in questioning his authority (and therefore sparking a debate over divine right and parliamentary privilege) and policies was an attempt by Parliament to make themselves a necessary commodity. This is corroborated by Source 13, ‘If accept that kings have the power of imposing new and higher duties and the right to do this is confirmed, I do not see and likelihood of future parliaments.’ Parliament’s use of subsidies to control the monarch is further confirmed in Source 12, ‘they forced the queen to concede the substance of their demands’. However, far from making themselves indispensable (as is shown to be their intention in Source 13, ‘Where prince’s prerogatives grow, the liberties of subjects diminish’) Parliament primarily succeeded in driving a greater wedge between themselves and James. James…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the document The Petition of Right, Parliament was bringing up their concerns to King Charles I. Parliament first brought up the problem of taxes, and how they believed that they should not be unfairly taxed, and in such an event should not be punished for not complying with unlawful taxation. Parliament also brought up their concerns of people being punished unlawfully, without first being allowed a trial by their peers. Finally, they brought up their concerns that in the case that a person be imprisoned, that they be allowed to be told what it is that they are being charged with. In this document, Parliament used past examples of statutes, and decrees of former kings to push back against the king, and to back up what they desire. They…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Additionally, parliament desired to stop his freedom of movement and they framed this as concerns they had about the King going to Scotland, because with Charles’ trip to Scotland came the worry that he would try to deploy a Scottish Army against parliament and they also needed Charles present to pass bills. As mentioned earlier parliament wanted Charles to not be able to choose his own advisors, they wanted only those who were ‘parliamentary approved’ to advise the King, as they ‘believed’ it was these advisors that were the root of the division between the King and his people, they couldn’t directly challenge the King and so went against his advisors and his power. Parliament were also scared that the King’s Arminian beliefs would influence his children and to ensure the future King or queen was closer to the public they wished to limit the King’s education and command over them via the introduction of only those who were ‘parliamentary approved’ to educate the children. In relation to the previous proposition regarding the sharing of authority over the military, parliament also wanted charge over the army’s regime (training, equipment, etc.) as they didn’t trust the King.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    -Despite their differences, the growth of the colonial population produced an almost continuous line of settlement along the seacoast and led to the gradual construction of roads and the rise of intercolonial trade. Colonial postal services also helped increase communication.…

    • 2820 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King James I, the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, was coronated to king of England in the year 1603 in which he was already an experienced monarch due to the fact that he has been ruling over Scotland since 1567. James believed that kings are a representation of god on earth and that kings cannot be judged or punished by the “mere” humans but by god. Even though he did not have any obligations to obey the law he did anyways to be an example to his followers. One significant attribute of King James was that he was the first one to reign sovereignly in the three monarchical kingdoms…

    • 116 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Why Did the Civil War Begin?

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages

    On 22 August 1642, King Charles I raised his battle standard and declared a civil war against his enemies in Parliament.…

    • 2630 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Glorious Revolution Causes

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The effects of Glorious Revolution in the sector of law – Due to the Glorious Revolution, many laws and acts were created to resolve the parliamentary system in England. Several changes were made from the constitutional view point. Post revolutionary parliament passed some of the important legislations.…

    • 2107 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like ‘The Declaration’ they also listed their grievances with James II and the actions he took that went against them and the laws that were in effect. It gave everyone in Parliament freedom of speech while parliament was being held, you could still be prosecuted for speaking outside of Parliament though. It also greatly reduced government corruption and led to a much more modern government similar to what is in place today. The King and Queen could not long create or suspend laws without Parliament approval. In order to be king, William III accepted their terms and the constitutional monarchy was put in place in…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1629 Chares the 1st suspended parliament and decided to rule as an absolute monarchy. However, he soon began to run out of money and begged for parliament to levy taxes once again. Kind Charles began to irritate parliament by suspending them again twice in one year. This caused the outbreak of the English Civil War in 1642. It was Cavaliers vs. Roundheads. Oliver Cromwell was the leader of the Roundheads and defeated the kings forces in 1649. The significance of this war was for parliament to not levy the taxes the Charles demanded. Parliament…

    • 939 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays