Preview

Passion and Moral Judgement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1420 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Passion and Moral Judgement
Passion as the Criterion for Moral Judgment

Ethics is the study of human conduct or in other words the study of moral behavior. All humans use ethics in their daily actions and decisions, but not many have the opportunity to probe into the core of ethics. When Socrates said in 399 B.C., "The unexplained life is not worth living" he was encouraging man to examine his way of life and ways of moral decision making. Ethics not only aims to discover the rules that should govern a moral life, but the goods one should aim to acquire in their life time. Ethics aims to explain why and how man acts the way he does and to shape the way man lives and acts,. Some philosophers say that reason is the criterion for making moral judgments, others say that duty and obligation rule moral decisions. Eighteenth century philosopher David Hume gave a different outlook on what makes man act the way he does. Hume takes an almost Epicurean stance and proclaims that man's passions overrule reason and direct man's moral actions and judgments. Moral judgments are manifestations of human sentiments and passions.

Hume states that the passions are the only way to understand morality. The nature of moral values is to be discovered through the passions. Hume rejects that reason is the criterion for moral judgments, and bases most of his "Treatise of Human Nature" on refuting reason as the basis for moral actions.

Hume strongly opposes the idea that moral judgments are the conclusion of reason. The role of reason in relation to moral judgments is to be only in relation to the passions. Reason must be slave to man's passions. Reason is to help man find his moral obligations and duties, but reason does not produce or act on obligation or moral duty; man's passions motivate one to act.

Passion is the criterion for all moral judgments because there are no absolute moral values. Moral values differ from one person to the next because they are based on human experience.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Even though he had classified justice as one of the artifial virtues, he later identifies it, along with benevolence, as a social virtue. He argues that although benevolence is necessary for self-enjoyment, it cannot be reduced entirely to self-interest as the Hobbesians think but tends rather to promote social welfare. While benevolence is an original principle in human nature, justice is not. The need for rules of justice is not universal. It arises only under conditions of relative scarcity, where property has to be regulated to preserve order in society. For Hume the language of morality implies some sentiment common to all mankind, which recommends the same object for general approval. It also implies some universal and comprehensive…

    • 397 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been a number of challenges questioning Hume’s sympathy. Some questioned the subjectivity of sympathy, since there should be an objective basis for moral evaluation, and sentiments, being the product of sympathy which is subjective to some extent, is not entirely an objective basis for moral evaluation. Some others challenged Hume with the “virtue in rags” argument, which suggests that sometimes good motives do not bring about pleasure in anyone, but we still approve of such motives, which is inexplicable by Hume’s sympathy. Another challenge is called the weak sympathy problem, which challenges Hume’s sympathy by pointing out that Hume only allows us to sympathize with others at a particular instant, and the object of sympathy is…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Back in Hume’s time, there were mainly three schools of thought regarding the nature of morality. This debate was initiated by Thomas Hobbes’ view that moral obligations and duties came from self-regarding motives. In response to Thomas Hobbes’ argument, there are two schools of thought, namely rationalism and sentimentalism. Rationalists such as Samuel Clarke argued that morality could be explained by pure reason , and acting morally is just the same as acting rationally. Hume is on the side of the sentimentalists, as he rejects reason as the basis of morality . Hume argues, rather, that it is our moral sentiments that serve as the basis of moral approvals and disapprovals . In Hume’s picture, each action produces certain feelings in the recipients, be it pain or pleasure, and it is through sympathizing with the recipients which we have an impression of the resulting pain or pleasure in the recipients, and thus approve of or disapprove of the active person’s character trait which led to the action.…

    • 216 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Hume is an Empiricist, this means that he believes that the source of a humans knowledge derives from or mostly from their sensory experiences. In short, people gain knowledge from their experiences. For example, children learn languages through constantly hearing someone (a parent or guardian) speaking to them in a certain language. Another example is that one can come to know what different colors are due to actually seeing the colors. Simply knowing the name of a color does not entail that someone knows what the color actually looks like. One can never fully come to know what a color is by simply being given the definition because in order to know what a color is, one must have a visual of the color to connect with the name. Thus according to Hume, a person learns and obtains knowledge through sensory…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sympathy, under Hume’s definition, clearly varies in terms of degree with the different connections the objects of sympathy have with us: we are more able to sympathize with a person close to us than with an indifferent stranger, and we sympathize more readily with our compatriot than with a person from another country with a different color of skin, as implied by the principle of association of ideas. Moral evaluations, on contrary, should not vary with the relationships the person, whose character trait is being evaluated, has with us. It is therefore counterintuitive for Hume to have his account of morality based on sympathy, which apparently possesses such a biased character. When two persons, with different relationships with us, share…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hume believes the root of morality is emotion. He believes emotions, or passions, as he calls them, are the driving force behind our actions. Hume believes that how we feel about things determines what we determine is moral or immoral. There is no logical reason for keeping one’s promises if there is no benefit to you. However, we as a people have decided that keeping one’s word is moral because we would like someone to do that for us. We keep our promises because we want people to think kindly of us. There is no logic behind it, but there is emotion. Even when there is nothing to be gained for us by keeping our promises, we still maintain its moral to keep them because of how it makes us feel. This means, even when it is illogical to do something, if we feel it is moral, we should do it. Reason is not enough to change how we behave. It can give us some direction but it cannot compel us to do…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume 's take on human morality is a very interesting one indeed to contemplate. His main argument on the topic is that the morality of humans is totally derived from sentiment, and in no way has anything to do with reason. He first defines sentiment and reason. He says that the former refers to passions such as emotions, feelings, appetites and desires. Then he also goes on to categorize the passions as being either calm or violent. And according to him, it is our passions that lead us to action. He also states that passions can neither be true nor false, they 're "original existences" (Hume 42 column 2 paragraph 3). Then he defines reason as, what we can say, are ruminations of the mind, which includes beliefs, thoughts, conclusions of arguments, etc, and declares that these can be true or false. It is with these definitions in mind that Hume goes on to make the statement that passion and reason cannot oppose each other. Because passions are original existences, they are neither reasonable nor unreasonable though they are the dominators of our actions. Reason, however, can be put to true/false evaluations and are actually derived from our passions. Reason cannot contradict passion because this would be an internal disagreement of ideas, which are considered as copies of the object which they represent, i.e. the particular passion. He states though that a…

    • 1790 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    * Hume, David. Liberty and Necessity: an Argument against Free-will and in Favor of Moral Causation. London: Progressive Pub. 1890. Print.…

    • 2044 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    He believed that what we see is based on our experiences and ideas, and we do not act with reason. Imagination creates complex ideas. Hume opposed the idea of an eternal soul, and questioned the laws of nature and existence of God.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although I disagree with his opinion, Hume exhibits a very sensible argument. David Hume explains four essential circumstances. First of which, Hume believes that God should dispose of all pain. Because both pain and pleasure stimulate humans equally, why should we be able to experience pain? For example, as regular humans we experience feelings such as thirst and hunger, instead of being able to feel the pain of it, we should just be feeling a lack of pleasure. Why is it necessary to feel pain when I simply want to eat or drink something? Secondly, God should eliminate all general laws of nature. For example, if a car crash is about to happen, God should interfere and insure that no person will come to death or extreme injury/pain. Next, God should not dispense talents and abilities unevenly between each of his creations. “God” created animals that obtain optimal strength, ability to fly, and run incredible speeds, while humans are left with minimal physical strengths. God also created people that are talented in sports, making life easier to stay in shape and a possible career by pursuing these particular talents, while there are others who have no special talent and are forced to take extra measures in order to gain fitness and a future career. God should have given equality to all of his creations. Finally, Nature seems to have defects that allow us to see that sometimes…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hobbes vs Hume

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the history of philosophy, two of the most prominent philosophers were Hobbes and Hume. Both made important contributions to the world of ethics. One of the main important things they differed on is reason. Hobbs felt that reason is way to seek peace but Hume felt the reason is only a slave to passions. In the following paragraphs, you will see how Hobbes and Hume explain their different views on reason the theories of the two philosophers are analyzed in depth, so that we can have a comprehensive understanding.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ultimately, Hume advocates that the distinction when it comes to liveliness is…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Hume’s Response to Standards of Taste In this essay I shall assess David Hume’s thoughts and assessments on the standards of taste in the aesthetic world. As a philosopher who was more interested in critiquing art rather than explaining it, Hume began to formulate how art should be perceived or understood by form of ‘taste’ and the standards that accompanied it such as impressions. Hume relates aesthetic judgments to moral judgments as well, and differentiates between two types of aesthetic taste.…

    • 2270 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Moral judgements have historically been thought to occur outside of conscious control and be emotionally driven (Freud, 1976). Empirical data shows humans to make judgements in milliseconds, even before giving the decision conscious thought (Willis & Todorov, 2006). Furthermore, Hume (1777/1960) proposed that moral judgements are largely influenced by ‘gut feelings’ as research showed individuals to have an automatic feeling of approval or disapproval when making a moral judgement. Albeit only in ‘hypnotisable’ participants, Wheatley and Haidt (2005) furthered this by inducing feelings of disgust and found this lead to more judgements of the action in a moral transgression being morally wrong, supporting the suggestion that moral judgements…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judgment And Guilt

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Judgment is a dualistic approach to making a simple choice: we judge two in order to choose one. We judge one course of action to be right, and another to be wrong, in order to choose rightly. When judging two aggrieved adversaries, one person must be found guilty in order to vindicate the innocence of the other. You might think that the guilty are guilty, even before we judge them to be so; however, guilt does not exist prior to our judgment. Until then, there is a presumption of innocence because guilt has not yet been determined. You may have assumed that the process of judgment discovers the truth, or that it uncovers the guilty party, when in fact, it decides guilt and innocence in question. Judgment discerns and determines guilt.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics