Paternalism Seen Through The Perspective Of Arranged Marriage

Paternalism Seen through the Perspective of Arranged Marriage
Philosophers have argued about when the use of paternalism is justified. Paternalism may be justified by the various considerations of a society’s set of values and virtues. Ordinarily, the commonly accepted idea of what paternalism means involves supportive agents within society who infringe on an individual’s freedom for his/her benefit when the individuals of interest would prefer not to be treated this way. When discussed from a view based on cultural expectations and spiritual growth, paternalism turns into a challenge. Not only does paternalism for some Philosophers like John S. Mill involve the use of rational beliefs and virtues, it can also be justified when Philosopher
Thus, they may not be fully aware of what constitutes a full and lengthy relationship and the implications that come with being in the spiritual and luminous bond of marriage with another. Not only can those who may be hypnotized by the love they may feel for each other be irrational, but the progenitors who would be making the paternalistic interferences could be swayed to match their young with another solely on what benefits they can reap from arranged marriages. Traditionally, guardians are able to choose who their family member could marry with the hope that they will be rational and have positive intentions doing so. Philosophers like Mill think that paternalism intervention is substandard and does the individual targeted more harm than they would have caused if done by themselves. Conjectures made by Mill included thoughts like “All errors which he is likely to commit against advice and warning, are far outweighed by the evil of allowing others to constrain him to what they deem his good” (77). Mill restates that in order to achieve the most happiness, it is important for those who are directly impacted by an event to make their own choices rather than relying on another to do so for them. Other people may be coerced by some of the beneficial factors of such decisions and may make irrational choices. Such beneficial factors may include economic, political, and social gifts that the other family might bring with the traditional arranged marriages. Although guardians have the choice in these customary experiences, they also have the responsibility to respect the wishes of their individual involved in the coupling and not bias their decisions based on irrational thought and unjust practices. With following the purpose of paternalism, the parents must either find someone