Pathos Analysis

Sanders’ primary appeal is pathos, and he uses it in various ways to illustrate his purpose. Firstly, his diction demonstrates use of pathos, because the author incorporates words with emotional contexts and meanings such as “seductive”, “unglamorous”, “tolerance”, and “respect”. Second of all, Sanders connects with the reader and their feelings through the use and repetition of personal pronouns, especially “we”, “our”, and “you”. On the same note, the author employs words such as “people”, “human”, and “Americans” to appeal and relate to a particular yet diverse group, pulling them into what the writer is truly trying to say and attempting to make their emotions grow stronger for what Sanders is speaking about. Finally, Sanders utilizes pathos
For example, the sentence, “Colonists brought slavery with them to North America, along with smallpox and Norway rats” influences the reader’s view of the topic by providing an example of how “many of the worst abuses have been carried out by ‘people who root themselves in ideas rather than places.’” The author also demonstrates the element of rhetoric in a similar manner, by creating a vivid mental image through of descriptive words and phrases such as “If we fish out a stream or wear out a field, or if the smoke from a neighbor’s chimney begins to crowd the sky, why, off we go to a new stream, a fresh field, a clean sky.” Sanders utilizes the element of syntax by ordering his thoughts in a clear and methodical way. This is demonstrated through his use of transitional words, like “so”, “but”, and “when”, his clear structure of an introduction, two body or example paragraphs, and a conclusion, and his
In the third paragraph, there were many allusions used to credibility and historical context, such as “New World”, “Colonists”, and “Dust Bowl of the 1930s”. These examples are all related to some time period in which “some of the worst abuses have been carried out by ‘people who root themselves in ideas rather than places.’” Another strategy the author utilizes in his response is ethos. This is displayed by the way that Sanders discusses topics such as “bigotry” and the division between “tolerance” and “intolerance” to point out the morality and value behind his argument, also known as ethics. Finally, Sanders demonstrates parallelism through his effective organization of words, sentences, and paragraphs.
Specifically, his thought process progresses in a logical manner, all the way from the introduction of the topic to the final concluding statement that sums up his belief. The meaning of each individual statement stems from some other aforementioned idea, such as how the sentence, “So Americans are likely to share Rushdie’s enthusiasm for migration for the…” comes after Sanders discussed the general beliefs of Americans, those that correspond with