Preview

Patrick Henry's Speech Comparison

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
765 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Patrick Henry's Speech Comparison
“Give me liberty, or give me death!” Patrick Henry. The same message was delivered years and years prior to Patrick Henry’s speech. The era of the Romans was blessed with figures like Julius Caesar and Marc Antony. Caesar was assassinated and at his mourn Antony gave a speech similar that to Patrick's’. In the aspect of how they spoke, not in the cause they were fighting for. Patrick Henry and Marc Antony presented themselves to make their point come across. The similarities are much greater on how they connected with their audience, tone of voice, and factual evidence.

To start off, any powerful speaker knows how to connect with their audience. Both Marc Antony and Patrick Henry get on a personal level with the people. Seconds after starting
…show more content…
With these two men, they have such a strong tone of voice, that one feels in the moment. That moment when the speaker seems to be face to face instead of 10 feet away behind a podium.

“Have patience, gentle friends, I must not read it; It is not meet you know how Caesar loved you. You are not wood, you are not stones, but men.”

The words spoke by Marc Antony are like a fresh air to the Plebeins. This is towards the end of his speech. The end of Patrick Henry’s speech is more dramatic and sends a message to the crowd. The way he speaks each word and emphasis: exclamation point.

“Gentlemen may cry, Peace, Peace, but there is no peace. The war is actually begun! The next gale that sweeps from the north will bring to our ears the clash of resounding arm!... Our brethren are already in the field! Why stand we here idle?”

Patrick Henry is building up their adrenaline and making them think with the few questions that were dropped here and there.

One of the last reasons is the factual evidence presented by both speakers. No false statements were given which again gains confidence in both of
…show more content…
Marc Antony did not lie to the crowd which later one will benefit him due to the fact that he is a reliable person. The same goes for Patrick Henry when he states,

“ Our petitions have been slighted; our remonstrances have produced additional violence and insult; our supplications have been disregarded; and we have been spurned, with contempt, from the foot of the throne.”

When Patrick Henry made this speech all of this happened, he was not holding back on the truth. Again making Patrick Henry a reliable person. They both spoke the truth which makes them admirable speakers.

To conclude, both personals delivered wonderful speeches. Different eras of course but meaningful nonetheless. The way Marc Antony presented himself in front of the crowd or how Patrick Henry gave this trust when starting his speech. The tone of voice they both used is ideal when giving a speech. Probably one of the most important similarity they both had was how they spoke the truth. They did not tell lies to these people about their cause. The speeches had such an impact on their audience on how they delivered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry, in his Virginia Convention speech of 1775, encourages delegates to prepare for war against Britain. He urgently explained how peaceful protest is no longer an option. He uses rhetorical questions to create awareness of topics. He used rhetorical questions to create awareness of topics that help support his ideas of preparing for war. Henry says, “And what have we to oppose them?…

    • 211 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine you are in a foreign country controlled by a parliament two thousand miles away. You are getting taxed: laws and policies are being passed and enforced by men who have not stepped foot in this new land. This is how the freshly settled colonies had to face when they were controlled by the British empire. Americans responded in an act of rebellion by dumping 342 containers of tea into the Boston Harbor, this act of rebellion is better known as the Boston Tea Party. This event would be the kickstart to the American Revolution. Other events along with this one led up to Patrick Henry giving his “ Speech to the Second Virginia Convention” on March 23, 1774. Henry uses rhetorical strategies to appeal to his audience: he uses repetition,…

    • 148 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the “Speech to the Virginia Convention”(1775) Patrick Henry convinced colonist to fight against Britain; he constructed extensive use of three main rhetorical devices in his speech to persuade colonist to go to war and fight for what they truly desire. Presenting his speech in House of Burgesses, Henry sincerely respected his audience to gain their respect and attention to comprehend his urgency.…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The incredibly influential revolutionary Patrick Henry once heroically shouted “Give me Liberty or Give Me Death!” During this time, the Revolutionary War had been taking place. This era included the American colonies struggling to gain independence and officially become a nation of their own. In order to do so, some believed it was only necessary to rebel against the British Rule. Despite Henry’s proficient use of all three techniques, he most efficiently persuaded using pathos persuasion. Patrick Henry’s speech given to the Virginia House of Burgesses, known as the “Speech to the Virginia Convention”, expressed the demanding truth and dramatic perspective in which was utilized successfully in his convincing approach.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year was 1775 and the people of Virgina had gathered to together agree on a way how to stop the British from taking over there country. Every speaker used arguments that the best thing was to speak with the British about there disagreement, until Patrick Henry started his speech. Patrick Henry’s most effective persuasive technique was to scare his audience to convince them that the British was bad and that the people should fight with him.…

    • 419 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry does a great job of showing that you cannot judge if a person is good or evil by just their appearance. In Henry's, “Liberty or Death”, he does a great job of showing that our world is not how our parents make it out to be. The world we live in is filled with…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    die all slaves, than that Caesar were dead, to live all free men?” (Act 3, Scene 2, Page 2) This…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He begins to do so by asking the question “shall we try argument?” He then proceeds to answer with “we have been doing that for the last ten years.” By asking this question and providing the answer for the audience, Henry makes it clear that arguing has not and will never work. He later asks the question “when shall we be stronger?” Here, he helps the audience realize that they have been weak for a long time and have made no progress in attaining and preserving peace. Patrick Henry proves that the country’s leaders have failed to attain peace by asking questions that really help the audience understand that they must change their methods in order to be…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Akin to the Salem Witch Trials that took place in 1692 and 1693, the assassination of the great Julius Caesar in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar appeared to be unreasonable or unjust to many of those that honor him. However, unlike the notorious Salem Witch Trials, it is clear that as light manifests itself upon the mysterious reasons in regards to why Julius Caesar was brutally murdered, it is made obvious that Julius Caesar may not have been quite the adored and honorable man that the Romans so hoped for. There was a side to the Julius Caesar that remained hidden by his graciousness and utterly generous facade. This side of the great and almighty Caesar would prove to convince and compel the very Senators that served below him, that Caesar must meet his rather “timely” demise.…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry persuades the people to join the war by using the sources of logos, pathos, and rhetorical questions. He again convinced the colonists by using appeals of logos, throughout in of pathos, and used of rhetorical question, telling the people to go to war for liberty and…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Kennedy’s main rhetorical tone in his inaugural address was pathos. He used emotional appeal all throughout…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kennedy’s ability to persuade his listeners is not merely an inherent gift, but rather is obtained through intentional usage of word choices. Kennedy’s diction consists of words such as victory, freedom, poverty, revolution, and devotion. He specifically chose those words with foreknowledge of the appeal they would have…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stating, “'Tis his will. / Let but the commons hear this testament— / Which, pardon me, I do not mean to read” (3.2. 129-131), he knowingly suggests not only the existence of Caesar’s will but his refusal to disclose it’s contents. Again he asserts that he “must not read it” (3.2. 140) but reveals that “it is not meet you know how Caesar loved you” (3.2. 141). If he truly wished for his audience to remain unaware of Caesar’s love for them, he would have safeguarded the secret. By divulging the fact that Caesar indeed cared for them greatly, they subconsciously believe in this emotion. Antony once more affirms that “’Tis good you know not that you are his heirs” (3.2. 145). This line breathes hypocrisy as he explicitly tells the people the good in not knowing the truth he depicts. These mind games create an irresistible tension between Antony and his audience as they now crave even more clandestine…

    • 613 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Not that I loved Caesar less, but that I loved Rome more.” This is a famous quote from Brutus regarding Julius Caesar. Brutus was manipulated by the conspirators into killing his best friend Caesar. From his guilt, Brutus ends up killing himself. But before his own death, Brutus and Caesar’s friend, Antony, give a speech regarding the death of Caesar. Brutus’s funeral speech in The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare was most effective due to his use of pathos, ethos, and logos.…

    • 495 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry V, on the contrary, wanted to be loved, and was willing to compromise to be admired as so. While at Agincourt, Henry pretends to be a common soldier, to see what his men truly felt about the war. He wanted to be a better commander, and by asking as himself, the soldiers may not have necessarily been as honest with him. The Earl of Cambridge claims that “Never was monarch better fear'd and loved Than is [Henry]: there's not, I think, a subject That sits in heart-grief and uneasiness Under the sweet shade of [his] government” (Shakespeare, II, ii, 660-663). Coming from a person who conspired against Henry, it is reasonable to believe that Henry was well-respected and admired as a leader during the Middle Ages.…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays