Preview

patriot side on king george III

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
patriot side on king george III
As a patriot there are many reasons why I, Patrick Henry, dislike King George III (3rd). One of the many reasons is all the taxes that were passed by parliament. He started taxing us on sugar; or known as the sugar act. One of the worst things was the taxation without representation; they would tax us but not represent us. The one thing that didn’t involve a tax was that we couldn’t print our own money; we wanted our colony to print the money not Britain. Nobody except the loyalist wanted to keep King George III; well actually they didn’t want to disobey him. All the things he was doing was unfair to us, we had no benefits. The financial problems of Great Britain complicated the situation even more than it already has. They started out taxing us on stamps; they knew we needed them for official documents. Then the Townshend act was put into effect, that’s when we were taxed on goods which included basic items such as glass, tea, paper and lead. We had to import them because we didn’t make them. We all are just tired of all the taxes that parliament imposed. We felt like only our representatives had the right to tax us. After the Boston tea party happened, they set out the intolerable acts. They closed the Boston harbor until the Massachusetts colony paid for the ruined tea. The laws took away many of our rights, they were also making the Boston people shelter soldiers in their own homes. Those were just some of the reasons why I disliked King George III (3rd). I think it wasn’t necessary to tax us, people could barely afford food for their families even before the taxing started. What King George III (3rd) did just isn’t the right thing to do.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Patrick Henry was a lawyer and politician between (1736-1799). Patrick Henry was a leading figure of the american revolutionary period. Patrick was a opponent of the stamp and townshend acts levied by England. Patrick was best know for the saying Give me liberty or give me death speech to the Virginia assembly in 1775. Patrick had a role in the overthrow of the royally appointed Virginia and was elected governor. Patrick criticisms helped bring about the amendments that became the bill of rights. Patrick was a failure as a p;anter and storekeeper but then had a success as a lawyer and politician. Patrick opposed the tariffs imposed by the townshend acts and the british attempt to collect them by using the Royal Navy and naval courts martial.…

    • 199 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1: Chapter 1 introduces King George III and the conditions in England prior to and during the deployment of British troops to Boston. Described as “a person of simple tastes and few pretensions,” the king is shown to slowly feel disdain towards America.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Patrick Henry’s argument on declaring independence on Great Britain and going to war was an inspiring speech that has shined a new light on the subject of whether to declare independence or stay loyal to a country that has done us more harm than good and has ultimately led me to become a rebel. I have become a rebel for two main reasons, our petitions that they have not noticed were an attempt at peace and the mistreatment from the last ten years. To start, petitions had not been productive whatsoever. When Britain had done something that had made us miserable, we decided to meet in the middle and make peace with Britain though petitions. Unfortunately Britain had ignored and disregarded us and our petitions, and instead, had sent us harm and…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We can all agree that Patrick Henry has accomplished lots in his lifetime. To failing in business, or being one of the most influential bodies in the American Revolution, he was severely affected the outcome of our world right…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Boston tea party the British passed what was called the intolerable acts. This acts punished the colonist and made them pay for the tea they destroyed (doc 4). The British thought that this was the final straw and the colonist would finally listen. This drove the British to keep putting pressure on the colonist and made them eventually just explode. When the British kept on with these acts they pushed the colonist to their breaking point and since the British were already making so much money it was clear King George just got greedy. (doc…

    • 511 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, I do not believe that the taxes that King George III imposes on us are fair. Taxes such as the Stamp Act and Townshend Acts were placed on our common goods. To be quite honest, they are not high but our consent was not even sought out. Tabitha: I understand that the taxes were imposed without…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    King George III ruled Great Britain during the years of the American Revolutionary War. American colonists were unsatisfied with his rule. As indicated by Bob Ruppert, between 1774 and 1776, he passed out many acts that people detested. Passage of the Coercive Acts, the Quebec Act, the New England Restraining Act, and the Prohibitory Act. King George lost all of the people's trust and faith. "A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may be define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people", Thomas Jefferson stated, saying that the king is a tyrant who violates people's natural rights and should not have power upon free people thus convincing them to support independence.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dear Billy Bob, it’s your cousin Samantha writing to ask you, how are you still a loyalist?Have you not heard about what has happened in Boston.One of the many laws that your king passed was the Quartering Act,this law allowed any troop to barge into your home with out your consent.Imagine having to provide for a stranger for as long as they liked while supporting yourself.Although this not all,an event called the Boston Massacre occurred on March 5th 1770.Gun shots and yelps were heard in the center of town,killing 5 colonists.This event caused an abundance of anger calling for the removal of troops in Boston.If you are still loyal to the king at this point here is another reason why you should become a patriot.The Tea Act was passed three…

    • 196 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The king was also a tyrant. First, he let all of the above happen, and other things too, like the Proclamation of 1763. He declared the colonies ‘out of his protection’ and then proceeded to start the Revolutionary War. If he never sent people out to colonize America, this probably still would’ve happened, but people would overthrow him to create a new government.…

    • 63 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas I really enjoyed reading your post I found it to be very interesting, it was especially interesting when you mention that lives were lost in the war for independence between the American colonies and the British. Don’t you think that it is interesting that the king showed his support to the American colonies in getting their independence and that the American Revolution was also an inspiration to the people of France? I think that this is really interesting because the king showed his support and then the cause he was supporting was what inspired the people to fight for liberty and equality. It kind of makes one wonder if the king truly thought about his decision of supporting the American colonies, because if he did think about it…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thinking of today’s society, it seems he was right to an extent. No rebellion has been able to overthrow the government and that’s because of the measure we have taken as a society to make sure something like that didn’t happen. What this revealed to me about Patrick Henry was that he thought more government would infringe on their liberty that they came to America for. These points made by both are difficult to not agree with both because I agree with both gentlemen here. We need government to make sure the country doesn’t fall apart but we don’t need the government trying to control our every move and…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Americans were justified in waging war because King George III was ignoring and not listening to the colonists.” Some of them had been tarred, others had their property burnt and destroyed by the populace”(Doc. I). The King of British did not give any of the colonists a say in the government which caused the tarring and destroyed populaces. “There is another late act of Parliament...The Townshend Act.” (Doc. B). The colonists once again didn’t have a say in the government. The colonists didn’t even have a choice about the…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    King George III has injured us emotionally and physically. We know that we want liberty and freedom, so let’s go get it. Patrick Henry in the “Speech in the Virginia Convention” commented, “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death”(Henry)! People in this country would rather die than be under Britain rule any more. We have a plan to star our own country strong.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Comparison

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Declaration of independence and the Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death speech, are both telling the people that the British is no good. In the Declaration, it says “He has refused his Assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good”, referring to the British king, which means that the king has broken the laws that were for the good of the people. This shows that the king of Britain is doing bad things. In Patrick Henrys speech, Give Me Liberty or Give Me Death, Henry says “Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house?” he is asking the President when will we fight the British. The British have come and invaded us and we need to fight, is what Henry is trying to tell the people.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    King George Vi

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing both Text 1: The King’s speech film posters and Text 2: The king’s real speech, it is clear to see that the two different kinds of text both centered on the same topic; King George VI’s first official speech on the 3rd of September 1939. They are also both centered on King George’s famous speech defect and how it affected and caused him a lot of trouble both in being the king and in his personal life. As text 1 are posters printed to promote the movie, The King’s Speech, a drama film about King George, which is actually based on text 2, the original speech given by the king in 1939.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays