Preview

Peaceful Resistance To Our Society Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
512 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peaceful Resistance To Our Society Analysis
Peaceful resistance to laws does not only positively impact a free society, it is essential to a free society. In our great nation, it is our First Amendment Constitutional right through the exercise of assembly, speech, press, and petition. Civil disobedience in order to resist a law is perfectly justifiable, as long as the law is unjust. Morris Leibman's "Civil Disobedience: A Threat to Our Society" is accurate when is said that "There can be no law to which obedience is optional". This is correct, there needs to be compliance in order for safety for the general public, however peaceful resistance to a law, when no one is being hurt, and done within the law is perfectly acceptable. What is meant by this is peaceful resistance is peaceful assembly, lobbying …show more content…

The Social Contract written by Jean-Jacques Rousseau in 1762 also embodies this same concept of when a government oversteps its boundaries it is the mission of the people to abolish the said government and establish a new one. A great example of this is when our very own nation fought and won against the British empire in 1776. Thus showing it is necessary to overthrow an unjust government. There are other examples in history of this through Mahatma Gandhi and leading his people to freedom. The biggest example of when peaceful resistance to an unjust law in today's American society should be utilized it when it comes to the Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act is unjust law because it it neither a natural law nor an eternal law. A natural law is a law that is always going to be needed no matter what. Regardless of what happens in society. Eternal law is law that God gave to us, and will never change. By these definitions it shows that the Affordable Care Act is neither of these. The government should never require its citizens to buy a product from a private

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws does positively impact a free society. The Boston Tea Party of 1773 and the arrest of Rosa Parks on December 1st, 1955 are both great examples of that. The british continuation of placing taxes on tea was the reason the Boston Tea Party first began. Angry colonists chose to dress themselves as Mohawk Indians (to not get recognized as they got on british tea ships) to dump thousands of pounds of tea down the Boston Harbor. Even though they were unfortunately punished after this by the british, it resulted in being one of the main reasons why America wanted independence from Britain and in the end were gladly able to achieve that! This brings me to the next point, Rosa Parks. Rosa Parks was arrested for not approving…

    • 233 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It depends on certain situations whether peaceful resistance to laws can have a positive impact or have a negative impact on a free society. Majority of peaceful assemblies can give the group of activist their freedom of speech and views towards something they believe in. Famous public figures like Claudette Colvin and Rosa Park's civil disobedience had a powerful effect on the world. Rosa Parks was arrested for refusing to move her seat for a white men while sitting on a segregated white bus in Montgomery, Alabama on December 1st, 1955. Similarly, Claudette Colvin found herself in the same predicament and she was declared the first woman to have that sort of refusal or peaceful resistance towards bus regulations back then. Even though they both knew their views were going to get them into serious consequences with the Jim Crow Laws, they spoke their views and truths about the world during that time. In Rosa Park's situation, fortunately her civil disobedience was a "peaceful resistance towards the law." Nothing seriously got out of control, too violent, or too extreme and to foreshadow when it did; the people of the African American community just stood back up and refused to let the world shut…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When answering the question does peaceful resistance to laws positively of negatively impact a free society, one word takes precedence - peaceful. Too many times we overlook that word and the result is just resistance to laws. In recent days, something that was titled peaceful demonstration turned into violent protest. The violence is often the intention of the "resistance" groups from the onset. The latest example comes from those who protested the outcome of the presidential election of Donald Trump. Their intention was violence and destruction in the name of protest. Egged on by media corporations with political leanings, these enraged individuals are given a free pass. This gives actual civil disobedience no chance to create positive change. The majority of protestors have no idea what cause they are associated with, just looking for their shot to get on television. The next "protest" must outdo the last and so on and so on. It is now commonplace to destroy property, set fires and attack innocent bystanders to get your point across.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to law positively impacts society. Humans have a lengthy, detailed history of not always being able to see what is right or moral in certain circumstances, and unfortunately, humans are who create laws. One infamous example of unjust laws would be the Jim Crow laws of the south. Today, it is clear as day that discrimination and racism is unconstitutional, but why was it so hard to see that during that time period.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful defiance of laws effectiveness is all in the eye of the beholder. If done correctly it can bring attention to the movement in a positive light. However if it causes to much of a nuisance to people that do not support the cause it will receive much opposition. The most effective peaceful defiance of laws in my opinion would be the Civil Rights movements of the 50s and 60s. With their leaders they perfectly blended the ability to get their word out with complying with others to achieve what they wanted. Now at the time their tactics must have been a nuisance, but that is why it worked so well. They implicated many plans that involved people of all age and even all race to make people see how badly they were beimg treated.That is unlike…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, my point is that peaceful resistance to some laws is beneficial to a free market society because if people aren’t allowed to protest on specific issue or law, then are we really as ‘free’ as we say we are. The backbone of this country is built for the people and by the people. And if that’s still true, peaceful resistance can only help out our country, so democracy can stay alive for more decades to…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society.someone who peacefully resists a law doesn't harm anyone and gets their point across. This positively impacts society because it shows them they can change a law they don't like without using violence and still have their voice heard.For example Muhammad Ali's peaceful resistance got his voice heard around the world.He stood for what he believed in and did it the right way peacefully.He had supporters around the world behind him and his decision.Peaceful resistance positively impacts society because when someone peacefully resist the law it encourages society to do the same.Take for example Rosa parks peacefully resisting the law and not giving up her seat.By doing that she motivated…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to rules and regulations among society goes down historically as something so inevitably iconic as an occurrence known as civil disobedience. It is no doubt that civil disobedience, the act of opposing a law deemed unjust and peacefully disobeying it henceforth, spurs such great controversy in our society. Civil disobedience impacts society in a positive manner that does not hinder nor deteriorate the good name of the just nation that is home, but moreover poses as an influence for what is better accepted by humans as lawful.…

    • 799 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Civil disobedience is the active, professed refusal to obey certain laws, demands, and commands of a government, or of an occupying international power Civil disobedience is a symbolic or ritualistic violation of the law, rather than a rejection of the system as a whole. Non - violent resistance is the practice of achieving goals such as social change through symbolic protests. This a really interesting discussion due to the fact that it has so many layers which could change the way you think about the initial question entirely. For instance since the nation is free it would be reasonable that breaking the law would be a way to exorcise your freedom, laws are usually set to either prevent controversy or conflict. For the sake of the argument…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some of these protesters went too far and harmed rather than protesting peacefully. Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact a free society? The truth is that if the protests are peaceful leaving others unharmed then yes it is absolutely leaving a positive impact. Although some protests, such as the one after the election, have only left more negativity and harm than intended to have, resistance to laws can either be positive or negative depending on how the situation…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Does peaceful resistance affect our laws positively or negatively? In fact peaceful resistance has a positive impact on our laws. Just like publicity, non-violence is supposed to lower the bars of negative effects, impacting our laws. The relationship between the american public and laws enforcement has always, had a violent nature that as a country has never been able to escape. Yet, throughout the years the people of this country have used peaceful resistance to change so much of the mistakes, this country has made.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past years we have experienced many peaceful resistance against a few laws. For example, Cesar Chavez decided to boycott the grape industry. Martin Luther King Jr. gave the "I Believe Speech" in front of many Americans. Those were great peaceful ways to make our country better. Many people may argue peaceful resistance may cause a negative impact on our free society, but I can strongly disagree with that. People who say it causes a negative impact is because they are scared of the truth.They feel if they ignore everything that is really going on it will be okay. No, peaceful resistance is not to make our country dangerous; on the contrary, it is to make our country stronger. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote a letter when he was in jail, and…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peaceful resistance to laws positively affects a free society. Since we're Americans we've been learning about American History since we started school. Breaking the law is not always a bad thing. IF the law goes against something you believe in , and you know it's not right break the law. Yes, if you're caught you'll be jailed but it's worth it to stick up for something that you believe in. Take for instance in the Civil Right's Days when Rosa Parks was fed up with the unequal treatment blacks received opposed to the whites. If Rosa had abided by the law who knows where we would be. She was tired of the unequal treatment, if she was on the bus first why should she give up her seat to a man who just got on the bus. Rosa was jailed , but her…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is very easy for those who oppose the use of civil disobedience to think that those who practice it will have gotten nowhere with their attempts. Morris I. Leibman in 1964 called civil disobedience a "threat to our society and seemed to hold the law as an irrevocable ultimatum that happens to be the way by which all people should live. He questioned "whether there can be "civil" disobedience where there is a specific intent to disobey the law. Such a specific state of mind is ordinarily treated as the essence of criminality, hence not "civil"...". There appears to be an idea stating today that laws are perfectly correct and that it is foolish and criminal to fight against them. There is a major issue with that argument, and it is the essence of what antagonists of civil disobedience maintains, as well as the crux of what civil disobedience tries to defeat. The civilly disobedient draw their inspiration from examples in the past from the violent revolutionary wars around the world to the peaceful protests against the Vietnam War. They recognize that whatever their battle is, it is more futile to submit to a law that will serve them, whether the rest of society believes that law to be right or wrong. They understand that people have made great strides in politics, such as the reclamation of an entire nation or a landmark decision, when they band together and protest. Finally, they know that they will make the change that they wish to see in the world. While they are the only limiting factor, they have the power to make the greatest…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world there are many issues that people in the world do not agree about. People can protest and express their feelings about the issue in a peacefully manner or in an angrily one. Does peaceful resistance to laws positively or negatively impact the community and society as a whole?…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays