Preview

Pearson and Mcdonal Lawsuit Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3450 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pearson and Mcdonal Lawsuit Analysis
Pearson and McDonald’s Lawsuit Analysis
Samantha Penico
University of Maryland University College, AMBA 610

Executive Summary
There are two major lawsuits which the main populace has defined as frivolous. One of those cases is the McDonald’s split coffee case. This is the case where the plaintiff spilled her coffee and was rumored to sue McDonald’s for 2.7 million dollars and win. The other’s case is the Pearson dry cleaning case where a man sued Chung Dry Cleaner’s 54 million dollars for losing his pants. The plaintiff won in the McDonald’s Case and the Plaintiff lost in the Dry clearance’s case. In this paper we are going to dissect each case by the facts, the law, the issues, the ethical issues, the defendants preventative measures, and then the analysis of it all.

Introduction
Frivolous lawsuits have over taken our society by storm. Anywhere from someone suing over a pair of lost pants to a person suing over a coffee burn. But what is Frivalous? Perhaps there is more to see in each of these suits that was originally thought. In 1992 79-year-old Stella Liebeck spilled coffee on herself and sued McDonald’s for the coffee being too hot. In May 2005 Judge Roy Pearson sued Custom Cleaners for losing a pair of his pants. On paper both of the lawsuits look ridiculous and should be dismissed as soon as the titles are read. But when looking into the details one discovers propaganda hugely blown out of proportion on one case and the other being exactly what it looks like.

What are the Facts?
Factual evidence is what gives a case its meat, its substance, so without worthy facts it is very easy for a case to lose any of its stimuli. On the other hand sometimes the facts of a case with swift ones initial opinion in a complete 180. The Pant’s Suit and the McDonald’s Coffee Suit both have information to back the claim, however, only one can truly be deemed as proof.
In My 2005 District of Columbia Administrative Law Judge Roy. L. Pearson claimed Custom

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Kuehn V. Pub Zone Summary

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages

    PL sues D in negligence for damages from injuries suffered caused by the D’s failure of meeting the duty of exercising reasonable care to protect PL, a business patron.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    comm 450 assignment 1

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    b) Kleinberg Corporation was sued by a customer for product liability. The customer sought damages of $1,500,000. At the its December 31, 2012, year-end, the company obtained an opinion from their lawyers that the customer had a 75% likelihood of winning the suit with the damages likely to be assessed in the range of $800,000 to $1,200,000. Legal costs were estimated to amount to a further $150,000. In late January, before the company’s financial statements had been finalized, the company settled the claim with the customer for $800,000. The lawyers estimated their fees to be reduced to $80,000 because the matter was settled without going to court.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tyson Foods, Case No. 2-103 / 11-1186, is a prime example of an Iowa appellate court being relied upon to provide justice to each member of the case during a lawsuit filed against a corporation. Refugio Orozco Serratos (plaintiff) sued his employer Tyson Foods (defendant) because he believed the factory he worked in provided employees with unsafe working conditions, which lead to health issues amongst himself and his fellow co-workers of Tyson Foods. Mr. Serratos attempted to sue Tyson Foods over chapter 85A of the Workers’ Compensation Act because he believed his Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) was brought about directly from his working experiences and conditions at Tyson Foods. Ultimately, Mr. Serratos was not found in favor of this particular case because he could not prove his COPD was directly caused by his working conditions, especially since doctors believe his COPD could partially be a result of his past of…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The court case was about The Ransom Of Red Chief. The teams defended the witnesses such as Red Chief, Sam, Bill. The prosecuting team believed that Bill didn’t get kidnapped by those two kidnappers. The defense team believed that Bill was mentally challenged and Red Chief did harm his kids and abuse the cat. The prosecuting team said that Red Chief was hounded down by those two kidnappers and lured in by some candy that they had hidden. They conjointly believed that they put her in a bag and yielded her into a little shed. The prosecuting team won the case by way of evidence. I believe that the defense team should have won by way of evidence from the trial.…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Best Essays

    July at the Multiplex

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages

    Mr. Plex has two choices to make. The first is to negotiate settlement money or defend the lawsuit. As a group, we will give our best knowledge of business law, statistics, and ethics to help Mr. Plex choose the ideal decision. First of all we will compare the fraud and misrepresentation of business law. Furthermore, we conducted tests on Hypothetical test and a Confidence Interval calculation. Lastly, under the ethics theory of cost-benefit analysis, justice vs. fairness and rights, we decided on the best action that Mr. Plex is supposed to take.…

    • 3341 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    When examining the facts in issue within an offence, individuals are looking at substantive law. Essentially, the facts in issue are similar to the elements of the offence; however, facts relevant to the facts in issue can help increase the credibility of the facts in issue. In the Lethbridge College Mock Court Exemplar video (2004), understanding the facts in issue, as well as, facts relevant to facts in issue can help the Crown when creating their package to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the accused committed the offence.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Law 421 week 2 work

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A perfect example would be the case of Stella Liebeck against McDonalds. This is something my wife and I talked about when it first happened. We felt that to sue a company over coffee being hot was absurd. Coffee is typically hot that’s common sense, however after learning how badly Ms Liebeck was injured I have definitely changed my views on this case.…

    • 1527 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Casey Anthony case shows us how circumstantial is not enough to determine someone’s guilt. In the Casey Anthony case, each side used circumstantial evidence to prove that their story was accurate, and it gave them more room to use evidence as justification to their story. Not having any direct evidence did not give any facts for the judge and the jury to lean on. Not only is it important to have good quality and quantity of evidence (burden of production), but also it is important to use it persuasively (burden of persuasion). The burden of production cannot stand on itself to prove someone’s guilt, but neither can only being persuasive.…

    • 690 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant: Case Study

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Defendant when his daughter was living with him constantly updated the Plaintiff of what was going on with their daughter.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Summary: Marie-Claude operated a bowling alley in a commercial area that was adjacent to a residential area. Many small children used the parking lot near the bowling alley as a playground, and Marie-Claude was constantly tell these children leave the parking area maybe they will get injured. However, one six years old boy climb onto the flat roof of the bowling alley and while he is running, tripped and fell to the ground. But Marie-Claude continued to order the child off the roof by several times when he was on the roof.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For each legal issue the film provided a case or story in order for the viewer to better understand the situations at hand. The first case provided was the case of Stella Liebeck v. McDonald’s, the case of the hot coffee. Mrs. Liebeck’s family thoroughly and genuinely explain the case, differing in facts and tone from the media and tort reform…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Brady claim the evidence has to be material. If all the evidence is not presented, then how can…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many tort cases are frivolous, with some entering the realm of being totally ridiculous. The lawyers are not the only ones thinking of lawsuits as another way to get rich. The common American citizen brings lawsuits as a way of playing against the odds and will have a real chance to win.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Civil Action entails a major class action suit brought forth by several families against major conglomerates (including W.R. Grace chemical company and Beatrice Foods) that were alleged to have negligently damaged the environment of a small town to the extent that its practices led to the spread of leukemia. Jan, a personal injury attorney, decides to represent a woman that claims that her child and other neighbors of a small town in Massachusetts have been diagnosed with leukemia. The lawyer finds evidence that there were some factors that could have led to the contamination of the town's water supply by the conglomerates’ factory.…

    • 1008 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Reasearch Tote Case

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages

    The law defines a “frivolous” lawsuit as “presenting no debatable question” to the court. The tort cases Liebeck verses McDonalds and Pearson verses Chung were both highly publicized cases that were coined as “frivolous” lawsuits that have a negative impact on the economy and the way we conduct ourselves in society. According to Phillip Howard, Chairman of Common Goods, a legal reform coalition, Tort claims cost the country hundreds of billions of dollars per year and they are changing our behavior and culture (Pearle, 2007).…

    • 3071 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics