Preview

Performance Measurement

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
6223 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Performance Measurement
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/0263-7472.htm

Performance measurement in facilities management: driving innovation?
Michael Pitt and Matthew Tucker
School of the Built Environment, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool, UK
Abstract
Purpose – This paper aims to examine the state of knowledge of performance measurement in facilities management, in particular regarding the concepts underlying benchmarking in relation to its ability to drive innovation in the industry. Design/methodology/approach – An evaluation of the key issues surrounding performance measurement and the effective application of benchmarking systems are examined, exploring the possibility of applying a benchmarking technique to measure facilities performance. Findings – The paper suggests that a fully developed performance measurement solution via effective benchmarking can deliver as a business tool in facilities management (FM), whilst acting as a driver in the innovation process. Practical implications – With the nature of performance measurement having changed over the past few decades, the paper acts as a catalyst to how performance measurement systems and techniques operate within FM and stimulate innovation. Originality/value – By adopting the notion of innovation to performance measurement, the paper highlights new areas of thought to facilities management and how performance measurement is strategically applied to the industry. Keywords Performance measures, Benchmarking, Facilities, Innovation Paper type Research paper

Performance measurement in FM 241
Received October 2005 Revised August 2007 Accepted May 2008

Introduction Performance measurement is an area to which companies have paid much attention recently. Performance is regarded as a major competitive issue (Tranfield and Akhaghi, 1995). In facilities management (FM), there is a wide range of choices in measuring FM performance, reflecting the varied



References: Akhlaghi, F. (1997), “How to approach process benchmarking in facilities management: catering services in the UK National Health Service”, Facilities, Vol. 15 Nos 3/4, pp. 57-61. Alexander, K. (1996), A Strategy for Facilities Management: Theory and Practice, E & FN Spon, London. Amaratunga, D. and Baldry, D. (2003), “A conceptual framework to measure facilities management performance”, Property Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 171-89. Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D. and Sarshar, M. (2000), “Assessment of facilities management performance – what next?”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 1/2, pp. 66-75. Barrett, P. (1992), “Development of a post-occupancy building appraisal model”, in Barrett, P. (Ed.), Facilities Management: Research Directions, RICS Books, Coventry. Brackertz, N. and Kenley, R. (2002), “A service delivery approach to measuring facility performance in local government”, Facilities, Vol. 20 Nos 3/4, pp. 127-35. Brown, D.M. and Laverick, S. (1994), “Measuring corporate performance”, Long Range Planning, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 89-98. Buckler, B. (1998), “Practical steps towards a learning organisation: applying academic knowledge to improvement, an innovation in business process”, The Learning Organization, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 15-23. Camp, R.C. (1989), Benchmarking – The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior Performance, ASQC Quality Press, New York, NY. Codling, S. (1992), Best Practice Benchmarking. A Management Guide, Gower, Aldershot. Cooper, J.R. (1998), “A multidimensional approach to the adoption of innovation”, Management Decision, Vol. 36 No. 8, pp. 493-502. Drucker, P.F. (1993), “We need to measure, not count”, Wall Street Journal, April 13, Section A, p. 18. DTI/CBI (1993), Best Practice Benchmarking: An Executive Guide, Department of Trade and Industry, London. 252 Ernst & Young LLP (1998), Measures that Matter, Ernst & Young Centre for Innovation, London. Fitzgerald, L., Johnston, R., Brignall, S., Silvestro, R. and Voss, C. (1991), Performance Measurement in Service Businesses, CIMA, Black Bear Press Ltd, Cambridge. Ghobidian, A. and Ashworth, J. (1994), “Performance measurement in local government – concept and practice”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 35-51. Gilleard, J.D. and Yat-Lung, P.W. (2004), “Benchmarking facility management: applying analytic hierarchy process”, Facilities, Vol. 22 Nos 1/2, pp. 19-25. Hally, D.I. (1994), “Accounting for the 1990s”, Finance, December, pp. 129-82. Harvey, M. (1984), “Balancing facts against figures”, Certified Accountant. Hinks, J. and McNay, P. (1999), “The creation of a management-by-variance tool for facilities management performance assessment”, Facilities, Vol. 17 Nos 1/2, pp. 31-53. Honrec, S.M. (1993), Vital Signs – Using Quality, Time and Cost Performance Measurements to Chart Your Company’s Future, AMACOM, New York, NY. Kanter, R.m. (1995), World Class: Thriving in the Global Economy, Simon & Schuster, New York, NY. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (1996), The balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA. Kaplan, R.S. and Norton, D.P. (2001), “Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: part 1”, Vol. 15 No. 1, American Accounting Association Accounting Horizons, March, pp. 87-104. Kincaid, D.G. (1994), “Measuring performance in facilities management”, Facilities, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 17-20. Letza, S.R. (1996), “The design and implementation of the balanced business scorecard: analysis of three companies in practice”, Business Process Re-engineering & Management Journal, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 54-76. Loosemore, M. and Hsin, Y.Y. (2001), “Customer-focused benchmarking for facilities management”, Facilities, Vol. 19 Nos 13/14, pp. 464-75. Looy, B.V., Gemmel, P. and Dierdonck, R.V. (2003), Service Management and Integrated Approach, Financial Times/Prentice-Hall, London. McDougall, G. and Hink, J. (2000), “Identifying priority issues in facilities management benchmarking”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 10/11/12, pp. 427-34. McFadzean, E. (1995), Relating Facilities Management to Organisational Performance, Centre for Facilities Management, University of Strathclyde, Strathclyde. Massheder, K. and Finch, E. (1998), “Benchmarking methodologies applied to UK facilities management”, Facilities, Vol. 16 Nos 3/4, pp. 99-106. Mudrak, T., Wagenburg, A.V. and Wubben, E. (2004), “Assessing the innovative ability of FM teams: a review”, Facilities, Vol. 22 Nos 11/12, pp. 290-5. Nani, A.J., Dixon, J.R. and Vollmann, T.E. (1990), “Strategic control and performance measurement”, Journal of Cost Management, Summer, pp. 33-42. Neely, A.D. (1998), Performance Measurement: Why, What and How, Economics Books, London. Olve, N., Roy, J. and Wetter, M. (1999), Performance Drivers: A Practical Guide to Using the Balanced Scorecard, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester. Rangone, A. (1997), “Linking organisational effectiveness, key success factors and performance measures: an analytical framework”, Management Accounting Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 207-19. Performance measurement in FM 253 PM 26,4 254 Sarkis, J. (2001), “Benchmarking for agility”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 88-107. Stone, C.L. (1996), “Analysing business performance: counting the ‘soft’ issues”, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 17 No. 4, pp. 21-8. Teague, J. and Eilon, S. (1973), “Productivity measurement: a brief survey”, Applied Economics, Vol. 5 No. 2, pp. 133-45. Tidd, J., Beasant, J. and Pavitt, K. (2001), Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organisational Change, Wiley, Chichester. Tranfield, D. and Akhlaghi, F. (1995), “Performance measures: relating facilities to business indicators”, Facilities, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 6-14. Tucker, M. and Pitt, M. (2008a), “Innovative customer performance measurement and benchmarking”, paper presented at European Facilities Management Conference 2008, Manchester, June. Tucker, M. and Pitt, M. (2008b), “Update on the development of a customer performance measurement system (CPMS) for facilities management: enabling generic market benchmarks”, paper presented at CIB 070 Conference 2008, Edinburgh, June. Tucker, M. and Smith, A. (2008), “User perceptions in workplace productivity and strategic FM delivery”, Facilities, Vol. 26 Nos 5/6, pp. 196-212. Van Schalkwyk, J.C. (1998), “Total quality management and the performance measurement barrier’”, The TQM Magazine, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 124-31. Varcoe, B.J. (1996), “Facilities performance measurement”, Facilities, Vol. 14 Nos 10/11, pp. 46-51. Varcoe, B.J. (2000), “Implications for facility management of the changing business climate”, Facilities, Vol. 18 Nos 10/11/12, pp. 383-91. Venkatraman, N. and Ramanujam, V. (1986), “Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approach”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 801-14. Walters, D. (1997), “Developing and implementing value-based strategy”, Management Decision, Vol. 35 Nos 9/10, p. 709-12. Walters, M. (1999), “Performance measurement systems – a study of customer satisfaction”, Facilities, Vol. 17 Nos 3/4, pp. 97-104. Wauters, B. (2005), “The added value of facilities management: benchmarking work processes”, Facilities, Vol. 23 Nos 3/4, pp. 142-51. Williams, B. (1996), “Cost-effective facilities management: a practical approach”, Facilities, Vol. 14 Nos 5/6, pp. 26-38. Wilson, A. (2000), “The use of performance information in the management of service delivery”, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 127-34. Zairi, M. (1994), “Benchmarking: the best tool for measuring competitiveness”, Benchmarking for Quality Management & Technology, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 11-24. Corresponding author Michael Pitt can be contacted at: m.r.pitt@ljmu.ac.uk To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Best Essays

    Kloviene, L., & Gimzauskiene, E. (2009). Performance measurement system changes according to organization’s external and internal environment. Economics & Management.…

    • 3043 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: 1. ARMSTRONG, M. and BARON, A. (2004) Managing performance: performance management in action. London: Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development…

    • 1865 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In recent years, many management frameworks have been introduced such as Lynch and Cross (1991) “performance pyramid”, Fitzgerald & Moon (1996) “building blocks of performance measurement system”; Neely et al., (2002) “performance prism”; Kaplan and Norton’s (1992) “balanced scorecard” framework;, “six sigma” and “value for money” to have a wider view on the company’s needs to compete in the market.…

    • 5989 Words
    • 24 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Company is a subsidiary of Unilever NV (“Unilever”) that offers a variety of products which are classified into three main operating divisions: Beverage, Food, and General Management. Within these divisions are numerous products, and corresponding product lines, ranging from tea to ice cream to salad dressings. Each of these products lines maintains a different marketing strategy based on their market position and growth potential. Historically, Lipton’s strategy has been to invest more capital into the products that are the most profitable while simply maintaining the other profitable product lines that lack growth potential.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Operational performance measurement remains an unsolved problem. Despite the relatively little attention it gets in the management literature, designing and using metrics to track and improve operating performance is one of the most persistent problems that organizations face. In my interactions with companies in virtually every industry, I scarcely ever encounter one that believes it has an effective set of metrics for their operations: manufacturing, customer service, marketing, procurement and the like. To be sure, companies do have measurements for these areas that they employ every day, but few managers or staff believe that these metrics are the right ones or that they help the company improve its performance and achieve its strategic goals. This is remarkable for two reasons: First, operational performance measurement is so fundamental…

    • 8252 Words
    • 34 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noe, Hollenbeck, Gerhart & Wright (2015) also agree that developing a new performance management system consists of engulfing the organization’s goals and objectives and that the performance measures play a crucial element in determining successful…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Michael, A. (2009, October). PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT. Financial Management, 32. Retrieved February 14, 2010, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1893840211).…

    • 2084 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Performance measurements are used to characterize and define performance in a project. They are used to track and manage progress toward achieving specific project goals. Performance measurements help determine how decision-making processes of a project led to its success or failure, understanding these can help organizations make future improvements. It is a project manager 's responsibility to measure performance based on the triple constraints of time, budget, and quality of a project. There are many performance measurements a project manager can use based on the type of project at hand, this paper compares and contrasts the following measurements -…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Perrin, Burt. “Effective Use and Misuse of Performance Measurement”. American Journal of Evaluation. 1998, 19(3), 167-179.…

    • 5598 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    5-10 Performance Standards

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In order for performance assessment to work data gathering, observation and documentation need to be performed. These sources give good feedback as to whether goals are being met. There are many sources of data that we can use to check up on the performance management system. The different sources are: direct customers, executives, employees, managers, supervisors, and…

    • 1697 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The balanced scorecard is a management tool that is widely used in the manufacturing industry. This paper fulfills a need by healthcare providers to obtain information on implementing a balanced scorecard system that specifically addresses issues unique to hospitals. This paper also addresses how to measure productivity within a balanced scorecard system.…

    • 4559 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second key characteristic of a good performance measurement system is that it measures satisfaction of customers rather than abstract target numbers. For a long time, enterprise measures employees’ performance by whether they reach their target numbers. Such measurement makes mistakes on the purpose of producing. Target number sometimes means nothing. Whether enterprise meets the customers’ need and whether enterprise provides livelihood for people in need are important. Imagine that measurement system only focus on target quantities and despite the way to achieve them. Then all employees do their best to reach a large number. What if what they produce exceed customers’ needs?…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Managers have to be able to keep control of the work environment to make sure that the organization is moving towards the direction of the vision. One way for this to take place is to be able to measure performance to…

    • 961 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Budget Analysis Paper

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nonfinancial performance measures contribute to evaluating achievement, the company objectives and developing a strategy. Thus, in the case of Peyton Approved, they could adopt a balanced scorecard. “A balanced scorecard is a performance evaluation system that requires management to consider both financial and operational performance measures (Nobles, Mattison, & Matsumura, 2014, p. 1478)”. A balanced scorecard is a great way for companies to encourage communication, internal efficiency, and innovation that provides a picture so the company can see if they are meeting their objectives. However, one downside to using a balanced scorecard it does consume a lot of time in the planning process. Other measurements companies could use, are surveys to measure customer satisfaction, innovation, and product quality. However, nonfinancial measures are not the most effective way to offer the most accurate results compared to accounting measures; they can lack reliability and are difficult to implement (Ittner & Larcker, 1998). As with all business decisions when using any non-financial or financial performance measures, the ethical consideration that a company should consider is that all measurements need to be specific, value driven, support the company's objectives, and are measurable actions that drive top and bottom line business…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    performance of a business enterprise. It involves formulating and implementing strategies that will help in aligning the organisation and its environment to achieve...…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays