Preview

Performance Pay

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3676 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Performance Pay
Risk Aversion, Performance Pay, and the Principal-Agent Problem Author(s): Joseph G. Haubrich Source: The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 102, No. 2 (Apr., 1994), pp. 258-276 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2138661 Accessed: 14/12/2010 04:55
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Political Economy.

http://www.jstor.org

Risk Aversion, Performance Pay, and the Principal-Agent Problem

Joseph G. Haubrich
Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland

This paper calculates numerical solutions to the principal-agent problem and compares the results to the stylized facts of CEO compensation. The numerical predictions come from parameterizing the models of Grossman and Hart and of Holmstrom and Milgrom. While the correct incentives for a CEO

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    2. A principal-agent relationships involves the owners (principals) delegating decision-making authority to managers (agents). A conflict occurs when the agents pursue acceptable levels of shareholder wealth and profit rather than a maximization of profit. They are pursuing their own self-interests. One way that the agents act in their own self-interests would be by focusing on long-term job security. This could cause the agents to limit the amount of risk taken by the firm. The firm may have an opportunity that is considered a riskier venture that could produce high profits if successful. If the venture proves to be unsuccessful, then the agent is at risk of dismissal. Therefore, the agent may avoid taking advantage of that opportunity. This may also impact decisions concerning diversification and the nature of the cash flow. The actions of the agents are impacted by their compensation package, threat of dismissal, and the threat of a takeover by new owners. In order to mitigate agency problems, agents can receive either cash compensation or long-term incentives. The issue with immediate cash compensation is that it can further promote an agent to act in his or her own self-interest. For example, agents may choose a path of diversification that will result in immediate earnings. This could inflate the quarterly earnings that are directly tied to the agents’ executive bonuses that quarter, but hurt the profitability of the company and the value of the stock in the long-run. In addition, the cash compensation could work to take away from resources that could be used in the advancement of other areas of the company in order to promote growth in the company. Long-term incentives would be a better way to reward agents in order to align their interests with the interests of the principals. These incentives include restricted or deferred stock, as well as long-term performance based payments. If an agent owned…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Milkovich, G. T. (1987). A strategic perspective on compensation management (CAHRS Working Paper #87-01). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/444…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    Executive compensation has been at the forefront of discussion for a long period of time. Analyzed by academics, highlighted by the media, questioned by Congress, and scrutinized by the general public, the topic warrants much debate. In the 1990’s, total executive compensation increased substantially as companies began offering stock option programs; CEO’s of S&P 500 saw an average increase of 150%.1…

    • 2571 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    s the overpayment of CEOs and the effects these high base salaries have on businesses. Understanding that well compensated CEOs are generally quite productive and well deserving; there are those that seem to drop the ball and the business suffers. CEOs are hired in with contractual compensation packages, which do not give stipulations to cover incidents such as decreases in stock value, company downsizing, or bankruptcy. Many argue that CEOs are not compensated enough for the pressures they endure, that they are generally they first to receive pay cuts when the company is facing financial distress, and in some cases are first to be dismissed in order to save others in the lower echelon. Because of these compensatory packages given when hired, when the company’s financial stability is no longer solid, the CEOs are still guaranteed pay increases and incentives that they continuously accept. The Board of Directors may believe that their hands are tied and still feel obligated to compensate for past performance, or feel the need for continuous compensation for the purpose of retaining the employees. Regardless of their reasoning, the Board of Directors, are under pressure to make cuts that trickle down to the average workers. I will present, and offer support for my argument, that top executive’s over compensation is unethical during times when the company is in a financial struggle.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Efficient risk bearing hints that it is better to give employees fixed salaries, while incentive considerations lead to the conclusion that it is better to tie pay to performance. (Brickley, Smith, and Zimmerman, 2009). Thus a well-designed compensation plan should be able to reflect the trade-offs between these two.…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ecco 550 Assignment 1

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Explain several dimensions of the shareholder-principal conflict with manager agents known as the principal-agent problem. To mitigate agency problems between senior executives and shareholders, should the compensation committee of the board devote more to executive salary and bonus (cash compensation) or more to long-term incentives? Why? What role does each type of pay play in motivating managers?…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ethics and Ceo Pay

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bebchuk, L., & Grinstein, Y. (2005, April). The Grow of Executive Pay. Retrieved November 29, 2012, from Harvard University: John M. Olin Center for Law, Economics and Business…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of implementing a variable pay system that is linked to performance? (2 points)…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Death in Prime Time

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Sage Publications, Inc. and American Academy of Political and Social Science are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.…

    • 3086 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pummeled by the bind of a painful recession and furious over oversized executive compensation packages at the very Wall Street firms widely blamed for the economic chaos, they gradually distrust key establishments and individual leaders. Americans are angered at the financial services region. They believe that these institutions have rigged the game so that top level executives are rewarded substantially even when they fail. Americans want action to restore fairness to the system and get pay back in line. The variety of experts and activists of political leaders and ordinary citizens, there is a belief that executive incentives have exaggerated short-term perfor¬mance, supported unnecessary risk-taking, and failed to discipline poor performance. Many believe that incentive plans have tempted some CEOs to put personal financial interests in front of good stewardship that provides the long-term interests of their organizations (Ethics Resource Center,…

    • 1089 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Are Ceos Overpaid?

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “The answer to the question of whether American CEOs are overpaid is clearly "yes"; for those who earn large bonuses and generous stock options when their companies are doing badly, either absolutely or relative to competitors. As mentioned in an article written by Gary Beckner and Richard Posner. This research paper will discuss in details the facts that have been research as to why CEOs are being overpaid. It will discuss the pros and cons of the CEOs salary and compensation and how employees should share part of the profits accordingly.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Since the time of FDR the press, the general public, politicians, and academics have questioned the validity of high CEO pay. Following World War II, executive compensation was growing, but at a relatively slow rate of 0.08%, this was up until the mid 1970’s. Then for some reason the growth rate accelerated, increasing by an astounding average of 212% (Frydman and Jenter, 2010). This rapid growth can be traced back to Milton Rock and Edward Hay who brought about “peer groups” as a means of evaluating executive compensation. These peer groups essentially rigged the compensation system where all CEO’s are seen to be above the median, therefor their pay increases continuously (Elson and Ferrere, 2013). Attacks on this excessive executive pay…

    • 1607 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Denis, D., Hanouna, P., Sarin, A. (2006). Is there a dark side to incentive compensation? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12: 467-488.…

    • 1095 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Executive Compensation

    • 15228 Words
    • 61 Pages

    The economic downturn in late 2008 brought forth the resurgence of an interesting topic - executive compensation. This topic was bound to bring much controversy as a result of the dramatic increase in executive compensation over the last decade[2] and the recent massive failure of many large companies.[3]…

    • 15228 Words
    • 61 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics