Preview

Persuasive Essay for Pro Capital Punishment

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1275 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay for Pro Capital Punishment
Persuasive Essay

Why Capital Punishment Should Remain in Effect
Stefanie Ridgway
DeVry University, ENGL 112
Professor Adams
April 19, 2010

Capital punishment, otherwise known as the death penalty, has been effective tool in our country’s justice system since its inception. When an inmate is given this, the harshest sentence available, it is always with just cause. Capital Punishment is an important tool in our criminal justice system today and there are several reasons it should remain in effect. Although capital punishment opponents would argue otherwise, there is undeniable proof that capital punishment is in fact a deterrent to committing crimes with that would warrant this sentence. One of the most basic instincts that human beings have is self-preservation. Self-preservation is defined as “the wish to stay alive and protect yourself from things that might hurt you” (MacMillandictionary.com). Having the knowledge that murdering someone could cost you your own life in return certainly violates the fundamental definition of preservation of one’s self. Although opponents of the death penalty certainly argue that a crimes penalty doesn’t deter a criminal, statistics say otherwise. In 1976 after years of challenges, the Supreme Court issued a ruling that suspended the death penalty, although that would only last four years until 1976 before it was reinstated there are some interesting numbers from that time. From 1972-1976 while capital punishment was on hiatus the per capita murder rate rose to its highest numbers over the four previous decades. According to Dudley Sharp, an expert with the criminal justice reform group Justice for All “The murder per capita rate has dropped from 10.2 (per 100,000 people) in 1980 to 5.7 in 1999 a 44% reduction. The murder rate today is at its lowest levels since 1966.” Seeing that there has been reduction in the per capita murder rate of nearly half since the executions have resumed, it is hard to



References: Deathpenalty.Org com Retrieved March 25, 2010 number of innocent on death row from http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/node/523 The King James Bible retrieved March 25, 2010 from Leviticus 24:19-24:23 Prodeathpenalty.com retrieved March 25, 2010 from http://www.prodeathpenalty.com/innocence.htm Wesley Lowe retrieved March 25, 2010 on the per capita murder rate from http://www.wesleylowe.com/cp.html MacMillandictionary.com retrieved April 19, 2010 from www.MacMillandictionary.com http://www.Enotes.com retrieved April 19, 2010 from http://www.enotes.com/drugs-substances-encyclopedia/barbiturates/effects-body

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    ACC/290 team paper

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The death penalty is set in place to punish individuals for the most violent crimes. Its purpose to keep the death penalty legal was to deter people from doing these horrible crimes. That attempt has failed terribly. According to a report conducted by the National Research Council, it was said that we could not depend on the death penalty to deter the effect of murder rates. “Claiming that the death penalty has a deterrent effect on murder rates are fundamentally flawed and should not be used when making policy decisions” (Radelet & Locock, 2012).…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may say that the death penalty is helpful to society because it intimidates criminals into committing less crimes, particularly murders, when in reality, studies like one done by Benjamin S. Tyree of the University of Richmond show that there is no correlation between the use of the death penalty and lower murder rates, and if anything, states that do not use the death penalty, have lower murder rates than those that do (Deter, Tyree). If that is the case, then it is obvious that the death penalty does not benefit our country.…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Historically there is no clear evidence that the death penalty has decreased the murder rate or acted as an effective deterrent to murder. Capital punishment is a violation of natural rights. This is wrong for everyone who is involved: The prosecuted innocent, the criminals, the victim’s family and our nation. The death penalty does not guarantee safety for the innocent. Nothing good comes out of hate, and nothing good can ever come from capital punishment.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital punishment, or the death penalty, is the execution of a convicted criminal by the state as punishment for crimes known as capital crimes or capital offences. Capital punishment is a justified form of punishment for murderers and is enforced by most states. The death penalty is a fitting punishment for murder because executions maximize the public safety through a form of incapacitation and prevention. When a person kills another person, their common sense and mental reasoning is lost. As a result of this, the murderer is no longer capable of a mentally stable life not only to himself but also society as a whole. In contrast, moral issues question the accuracy and the benefits of the death penalty as well.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Death penalty is the punish meant of execution, administered to someone legally convicted of a capital crime and there are twenty-two countries in the world that still impose the death penalty for capital crimes, the United states is one of them. If you are charged with capital homicide, and the jury of twelve of your peers proclaims, “We find the defendant guilty as charged”(Condenaststore). Then it is simple, you are going to forfeit your life, so abolishing the death penalty or there’s no coming back from the grave.…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    “So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty has been a criminal sentence imposed in America for hundreds of years, but it have been extremely controversial as Evan Mandery illustrates in “A Wild Justice: The Death and Resurrection of Capital Punishment in America.” Today, the death sentence is strictly used in murder cases and in thirty-two out of the fifty states in America. In these states, it is completely legal to use the ultimate punishment of death to incapacitate a criminal from committing any further harm to society. Throughout American history, many individuals have supported the death penalty because they believe it is an effective way to deter crime and is a form of retribution. Others have strongly advocated against capital punishment because it is not morally correct and it not applied fairly. Also, some argue that it is unconstitutional to use the death penalty because it violates the cruel and unusual punishment provision of the Eight Amendment written in the United States Constitution.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pojman Death Penalty

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages

    I agree that the people who kill should be punished severely and depending on the case sometimes be put to death. I also agree that it is possible that the death penalty may deter people from killing because of their fear of death, but I don’t think it would deter as many people as Pojman may think it will. I am confident enough to believe that while someone is committing a cold-blooded crime like killing someone what is going through his or her head is not the possible consequence. They are usually acting out of passion or out of fear, not thinking about how this may put them in the electric chair. You can also look at the situation of criminals that get out of jail but when they get out they keep committing crimes because they are so into what they are doing they forget that they are going to be punished. That is the main argument against the idea of deterrence, along with the fact that here is absolutely no evidence in the states with the death penalty that there are fewer murders. Actually many states in the south have the death penalty and at the same time have higher murder rates than states in the northeast without the death…

    • 2171 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Not only is capitol punishment fair, but also it is proven in academic studies to deter crimes in our nation. Academic proof supporting the death penalty has gone unnoticed in the past couple of years. Scientists have been studying the theory of if the cost of something becomes too high; people will change their behavior. Meaning, if by killing somebody your own life gets taken away, will people stop their behavior? The answer has been yes. Several…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    And some argue that states with the death penalty have a higher crime rates than states that don’t have the death penalty. However, every state is different in that each state has differences in population, number of cities and crime rates. For example, urbanized states are more likely to have higher crime rates. Also, states that have the death penalty are obliged to have it because of their higher crime rates and not the other way around. Let’s look at some facts. In fact, in 1960, there were 56 executions and 9,140 murders. In 1964, fifteen executions and 9,250 and in 1969 there were no executions. There was a temporary suspension on capital punishment from 1972 to 1976. During this time there were no executions and 20,510 murders. In 1980 there were 23,040 murders with only two executions since 1976. Between 1965 and 1980 the annual murders was from 9,960 to 23,040, which is a 131 percent increase. This is strong evidence that execution is a deterrent of murder. Furthermore, in the state of Texas, has the highest execution rate of any other state. Specifically, the murder rate in 1991 was 15.3 per 100,000 people. By 1999, the rate had fallen to 6.1, a 60 percent drop. In Harris County, Texas, which has the most aggressive death penalty prosecutions, as a result of the resumption of executions in 1982, the murders per year dropped from 701 to 241. That’s a 72…

    • 1964 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Philosopher Emmanuel Kant made an argument stating that killing someone for deterrence is using them as a tool, and it is unjust within itself (Pojman 70). Many think that by having the death penalty as a consequence for first degree murder, the rates of homicide will drop, because it will “put fear into the hearts of people”(Costanzo 96), but that is not correct. In a survey done by the Death Penalty Information Center, the number of murders in a state implementing the death penalty within the last twenty years have been higher than in a state without the penalty. As recently as 2010, the murder rate of states with the penalty was 25% greater than states without the penalty (“Deterrence”). Those statistics show that although the law may stop a few individuals, it is not a considerable enough number to call it deterrence.…

    • 1980 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Supporters of the death penalty always say that it is deterrent to crime but after several years of intensive research, 1)there is no proof that the death penalty is more effective than the alternatives. Furthermore the capital punishment is neither a practical nor a cost-efficient punishment. 2) In a detailed study in 2009,criminologists at the University of Texas at Dallas showed the falls information earlier studies provided, claiming that the death penalty had a deterrent effect (Christof Heyns and Juan Mendez). The government's job is it to protect the country’s citizens, but there is only little evidence that the death penalty is a strong deterrent to murder and other crimes. A recent study shows…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital punishment is an issue that has been used to handle severe crimes in nearly every country either now or in the past. Even though I understand both sides of capital punishment, I can not morally say that it's good. Though many say that the death penalty is the only way to go , it can not be justified because it is not morally correct to punish people with death.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ For hundreds of years people have considered capital punishment a deterrence of crime. Seven hundred and five individuals have died since 1976, by means of capital punishment; twenty-two of these executions have already occurred this year at Death Penalty Information Center”, exclaims Tara Volpe in her article, Capital Punishment: Does Death Equal Justice? In another article written by Coretta King, the author states that, “In recent years, an increase of violence in America, both individual and political, has prompted a backlash of public opinion on capital punishment”. Capital punishment is a tremendous issue that faces the criminal justice system. Some people think that capital punishment is a good idea for those who commit capital or very serious crimes; on the other hand, some people believe that capital punishment is wrong. In reality, capital punishment is wrong for several reasons.…

    • 682 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Paper

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States is inflicted upon criminals by the state as punishment for an offence. This method of punishment dates back to the beginning of recorded history. Various primitive tribal histories indicate that the death penalty was a part of many ancient justice systems (Wikipedia). Nowadays, it is primarily used in cases where someone commits murder. Some people think that capital punishment deters crime and prevents convicted criminals from committing greater offences, but this idea is false. It has been debated for a long time because it is a poor way of punishing murderers. Execution in the United States violates human rights and is not the most effective way to inflict justice. Examination proves this point. The death penalty clearly violates human rights, is not an effective means of preventing other crimes and is very expensive.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays