Preview

Persuasive Essay On Dna Testing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
692 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay On Dna Testing
For the pasts few decades, there has been a great development of the scientific area of DNA, deoxyribonucleic acid, helping on scientific research and most importantly as a tool for solving crimes. Before the usage of DNA, people only had shreds of evidence on the crime which could be detected by the naked eye. However, with the development of DNA detection technology, the police can identify or get some indication about the malefactor by collecting pieces of evidence that were impotent before; for example, hair, fingerprints and even blood (Travis, 1998). However, DNA testing consumes a lot of time and money. But even with this downfall, there is one unvarying fact: DNA testing is highly efficient in solving and preventing crimes. The use of DNA technology has increased the probability of finding the culprit and also prevents further crimes. Compared to the past, with DNA technology, today “more than twice as many suspects are[were] identified, twice as many suspects are[were] arrested and more than twice as many cases are accepted for prosecution” (Ritter, 2008). This is because of higher availability of DNA sources and uniqueness of DNA. Between two people, 99.9 …show more content…
When collecting the evidence for samples of DNA is extremely laborious and also time-consuming. The likelihood of finding blood stain somewhere in the immense area is infinitesimally small (Laird & Blackmore, 2009). By spending too much time on small evidence will not only take up the time but also lead to failure of finding the suspect. In addition, DNA matching could only happen when there is a matching DNA in the database; however, for the data of 2010, there is no library contacting all DNA of people (National Forensics Science Technology Center, n.d). In addition, when samples have a very low amount of DNA, it could have been disturbed by environmental conditions or the undesirable way of preservation (Figarelli,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A sample of DNA found in a crime scene was provided along with five suspects. Their DNA was then processed using restriction enzymes and Agarose Gel Electrophoresis. The objective of this lab was to match a criminals DNA to a crime scene using restriction enzymes EcoRI and Pstl with Agarose gel electrophoresis. Restriction enzymes cut DNA at a specific base pair site recognized by the enzyme, which then turns one single strand of DNA into many fragmented strands of DNA. EcoRI recognizes and cuts the palindromic base pair sequence GATTC while Pstl recognizes and cuts the palindromic base pair sequence CTGCAG. Agarose gel electrophoreses separates these fragmented DNA by their size. The negatively charged DNA moves through the Agarose gel to the positively charged end of the gel. The smaller fragments move through the gel more quickly allowing a linear view of the fragmented DNA when the process is complete. Since each individuals DNA will be cut into different size fragments when restriction enzymes are applied we can match one of the suspects to the crime scene DNA sample. This process enables an individual’s DNA to be matched, much like a fingerprint, to a sample of unknown DNA.…

    • 866 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Colette Aram Case

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Advancements in forensics science and DNA technology has revolutionised our ability to solve crimes, subsequently helping to develop clear and concise investigative processes. The discovery of DNA and methods of identifying individual genetic imprints such as Familial Searches has allowed more sophisticated analysis which has advanced since the Colette Aram case. Identification of DNA is vital when identifying and convicting suspects or even exonerating individuals. Thus, having an accurate system of DNA identification has been an essential discovery of the 20th century (British Medical Association, 2012). This paper will examine the limitations encountered while investigating the Colette Aram case, subsequently analyzing the advancements that…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction:Dna evidence has been known for many years in crime scenes.Dna evidence was first discovered in 1986.Dna evidence can find anyone by finding blood,skin cells,hair,saliva,and semen.Dna evidence can be good at finding people 95% at a time,because of the cells in the dna.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, DNA can solve criminal cases.it could help police to investigate crimes some people think that DNA fingerprinting is very accurate, and it also is very sensitive and can be contaminated easily. But DNA test results are much clearer than fingerprints and it is with these results can proofs that it is possible…

    • 348 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this day and age it is a constant battle to keep up with the ever changing technologies. Being properly educated in this field can mean the difference in catching criminals by using their DNA. Knowing how to properly collect, handle, store, and use for evidence can hasten the process of putting a dangerous criminal away for good. Knowing where DNA can be obtained from is key. Sweat, skin, blood, semen, saliva & tissue all holds DNA. You can obtain DNA from a number of items such as a cigarette butts, inside of a hat, bandanna, dirty laundry, stamp, envelope, bottle, can, and so many more items too many to list them all.…

    • 1332 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    DNA is one of the most important forms of individual evidence. DNA can be extracted from blood or other body fluids, semen, hair, and saliva and maybe used to identifying unknown individuals or in establishing a connection between objects or people. To identify an individual through DNA analysis, forensic scientist target 13 DNA regions that are different from one person to another and use the data to create a reflection of this individual’s genome also called DNA profile. This profile can be compared…

    • 1513 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is there a better way of solving crimes with DNA evidence to help investigators? The use of DNA technology is the best way to solve investigations. DNA makes it possible to identify people and to know who was at the crime scene based on a little piece of evidence. It helps solve crimes, and even, open cold, unsolved cases. DNA technology in criminal investigations has become an essential tool because of its ability to identify culprits through the use of fingerprints, blood, and genetic samples.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Although the justice system can be very biased due to the color of one’s skin, the modern advancements in technologies able to be used in crimes can rightfully be used to detect the rightful culprit. One major example of this is the ascertaining of DNA, recently found in the 1950s. This type of evidence is irrefutable because it is superfluously unique to an individual (excluding the case of a twin). It can be found through a myriad of ways, including skin, saliva, semen, blood, or hair. When this ground-shaking concept came out, it was almost like the rebirth of the discovery of fingerprints, for it was so marvelous. The reliable source, Pro Con, quotes, “A remarkable feature of DNA testing is that it not only helps to convict but also serves…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of Dna

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    DNA can be found in blood, semen, teeth, hair, saliva, fingernails, urine, feces, skin cells, and can be found anywhere in the body. The process of DNA testing begins when a forensic technician gathers blood, saliva, hair, or semen or any other DNA evidence from a crime scene. DNA has also been extracted from sweat, skin cells, eyeglasses, and used envelope seals. Blood and sperm cells are rich in DNA which makes it very useful in murder and rape cases.…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Dna Forensics

    • 2762 Words
    • 12 Pages

    Before the 1980s, courts relied on testimony and eyewitness accounts as a main source of evidence. Notoriously unreliable, these techniques have since faded away to the stunning reliability of DNA forensics. In 1984, British geneticist Alec Jeffreys of the University of Leicester discovered an interesting new marker in the human genome. Most DNA information is the same in every human, but the junk code between genes is unique to every person. Junk DNA used for investigative purposes can be found in blood, saliva, perspiration, sexual fluid, skin tissue, bone marrow, dental pulp, and hair follicles (Phillips, 2008). By analyzing this junk code, Jeffreys found certain sequences of 10 to 100 base pairs repeated multiple times. These tandem repeats are also the same for all people, but the number of repetitions is highly variable. Before this discovery, a drop of blood at a crime scene could only reveal a person’s blood type, plus a few proteins unique to certain people. Now DNA forensics can expose a person’s gender, race, susceptibility to diseases, and even propensity for high aggression or drug abuse (Phillips, 2008). More importantly, the certainty of DNA evidence is extremely powerful in court. Astounded at this technology’s almost perfect accuracy, the FBI changed the name of its Serology Unit to the DNA Analysis Unit in 1988 when they began accepting requests for DNA comparisons (Lewis, 1989).…

    • 2762 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Your DNA is split into two halves one from you mom and one from your dad, nobody has the same DNA as you unless you are a identical twin or a clone. Your siblings have different DNA than you though you have the same parents because the two halves combine differntly. In the year of 1984 Alec Jeffreys discovered the use of fingerprinting in a case. Since this discovery this tool has solved many cases and help with the falsely accused victims get out of the trouble they weren't involved in.DNA is a very useful in finding criminals, because it can be used to identify the exact person, whose DNA was left behind. It can be used in place of or alongside fingerprinting evidence.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    taken from the suspect has often been enough to charge a person with the offense…

    • 2627 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DNA fingerprinting proved to be a vital necessity in forensic science. It has help solved numerous cases and has help convict repeat offenders. Alec Jeffreys discovery that each individual had their own unique pattern and biological make up made an imprint in forensic science history. Based on DNA evidence, we can successfully convict those that commit crimes and exonerate those who were falsely accused when DNA evidence was limited. Due to states creating databases to retain DNA profiles, evidence can accurately identify past and future offenders.…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the previous years the field of forensic science has radically expanded. Technological developments such as DNA profiling and how investigations are conducted has significantly improved humankinds ability to investigate and solve crimes through everyday science. The use of DNA evidence in criminal investigations has helped law enforcement identify criminals and solve difficult crimes. DNA can also be used to clear the accused and free people who are wrongly accused or convicted of crimes. DNA was first described by scientists Francis Crick and James Watson in 1953.…

    • 757 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When an investigation runs out of ways to identify human remains, DNA can play a key role in the identification process. The most common methods of identification by a forensic anthropologist include "detailed skeletal and dental features," of the remains, but they are sometimes asked to perform DNA profiles as well (Arismendi, Baker, & Matteson, 2004). According to the paper by Arismendi, Baker, and Matteson, when the common modes of identification do not yield any results, "DNA typing may provide a further avenue of investigation (Arismendi, Baker, & Matteson, 2004)." Usually when the forensic anthropologist collects the DNA, it's from any tissues that remain on the bones themselves, and as they examine the remains, "it is usually necessary to remove any of the remaining soft tissue," leading some to wonder if the techniques used to do this may compromise the…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays