Preview

Persuasive Essay on Electoral Colleges

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
498 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Persuasive Essay on Electoral Colleges
Persuasive Essay on Electoral Colleges

In the United States we are all guaranteed one vote per person. Everyone has an equal voice in electing the people that serve in the government. Every four years during the month of November citizens of America go to the polls to vote for a president and vice-president of the United States. Am I right? Not really. They actually vote for electors that then vote for our president. It makes me wonder, "Are we a democracy?" Having the Electoral College defeats its purpose. I oppose the electoral college for these three reasons, in election 2000 the president that lost the popular vote actually won, everyone's vote doesn't really count, plus the electoral college has disrupted elections fifteen times!
First of all I would like to bring to your attention that many votes don't even get counted if you call the United States a democracy. The way the whole Electoral College thing works is that each state is allowed a certain number of "electors" (the state's number of Representatives plus its Senators), who then vote for the president. The elector's vote based on the state's popular vote. After the state verifies the votes, the candidate that receives the most votes get all of that state's elector's votes. Because the state's constitution awards electoral votes that way, the innumerable individual votes become meaningless. Does that sound fair to you? It doesn't to me.
Secondly, do you agree with election 2000? I surely don't, I mean the wrong president won the election. Gore received 500,000 more votes than Bush. But who won the election, Bush. All because of a policy called the Electoral College. It is a very controversial issue. I know that many people are unhappy about this election. I thought we were a democracy! And we choose are president, not electors.
Finally, these consequences go far beyond simple "fairness" issues. Too many times in American history the Electoral College has single-handedly defeated the purpose of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When citizens vote and cast their ballot for the candidate that they believe will be fit for president, they are not voting directly for their favored candidate. Instead of a direct popular election, the United States has the Electoral College, a group of elected electors who represent a certain states votes. The Electoral College was established by the constitution to protect minority interests and reduce the possibility of a regional candidate. However, some believe that the advantages of a direct popular vote election, such as its consideration of democratic values, outweigh the disadvantages. While others believe that the Electoral College has been put in place to hinder regional candidates not allow it to happen.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason is because it allows for the possibility that one candidate would win the majority of the popular vote across the nation, and still be able to lose the election if another candidate wins the electoral vote. This has happened on more than one occasion, most recently in 2000 when George W. Bush won the electoral vote and became President despite the fact that his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. The world was shocked when Bush was named winner of the U.S. presidential election, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials based on majority rule? The U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage. The result in 2000 election led many people to call for Electoral College reform or a change to a direct popular vote system. No major changes have yet been made to the system; the electoral college remains the “democratic” way we elect the President of the United…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The last problem with the Electorial College is that it seems as if our vote does not count. One of the things that is supposed to be so great about America is that we, as Americans, get to choose our leader. The sad thing is with this system the probability of your vote counting is very…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are other ways to satisfy the majority rather than abolishing the Electoral College. Lawyer Jeanne Kempthorne states some of the issues seen with the EC. One being that, “[the election] can easily result in an outcome that conflicts with the will of the people, whereby a candidate who loses the popular election nonetheless becomes president, as occurred in 2000 and almost occurred in 2004. This is a serious, recurring problem that afflicts both parties” (Jones 1). Robert Hall, a professor at Stanford University in Economics integrates that, “the Electoral College does not embody the egalitarian principle of popular sovereignty, the concept of "let the people rule" (Hall 1).…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral College Dbq

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages

    If the presidential elections were simply based on the popular vote, the United States would no longer be represented as a Constitutional Republic, but as a democracy. As explained in a Washington Post article by Charles Lane, a journalist and editor for the website, there is still need for the Electoral College in the United States, as he stated, “our current system elevates popular-vote losers to the presidency: that's because popular votes cast in a state-by-state contest for 270 electoral votes do not reflect the national will. Rather, they reflect the results of a competition…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although there are some that would say that the electoral college is what keeps our country the way it is and promotes good government(Document C). In order to truly maintain the idea that everyone is equal especially in voting the electoral college should be…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be a true democracy, the people should have the power to elect who they want as their officials. The problem is though, we are not a true democracy; we are a compromised, partial democracy. This is why the voting system should adhere to the desires of our citizens.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The electoral college should be abolished because it doesn’t benefit the people of the United States. The U.S government was established to serve all the people but the electoral college does the opposite because it disregards independent parties and also ignores the popular vote. Document B shows that independent parties are not adequately represented because they get zero votes in the electoral college which ignores any type of votes casted and received in the popular vote. This proves that the electoral college should be abolished because it doesn’t represent independent parties and it’s supporters. Furthermore, Document G shows that candidates that won the popular vote didn’t win the elections because the winners of the electoral college…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    They are actually voting for a specific group in the Electoral College. The Electoral College was made in the constitution to protect minorities. This gives everyone the right to have a say so and be equal in the election. Electoral College is just a way for the voting process to go by faster instead of having to tally vote by vote everyone just votes under a representative. With a representative for each candidate it makes everything fair and each voice is equally heard. The only downfall about Electoral voting is it only really opens opportunities for two-party systems. It doesn’t really give third parties an opportunity to succeed. A direct popular vote would probably make more Americans vote because they would probably feel like their votes are all counted. The process in my opinion is currently already at its best. If the Electoral College didn’t exist, I also believe there would be scams in voting and elections would go…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Electoral College is the current system America uses to elect the president. How this systems works is when you vote, you aren’t really voting, you are telling an elector where you would like your vote to go to. Once everyone has voted, the elector votes for a candidate based on the votes of the people. There are anywhere from three to about 55 electors per state. I believe this system should be replaced with the popular vote method.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    You have to remember that the country’s citizens are not directly voting for the President, the government simply allocates Electorates in the way that they think is right, so those Electorates can vote for the people. Considering the fact that it is possible for the Electoral College to misinterpret popular votes, it doesn’t seem wise to continue the Electoral College system. Another reason as to why the Electoral College should be abolished is because the process holds a heavy favor towards the concept of a “Two Party System”, preventing smaller third parties from winning. Fairvote.org, a voting information website, states: “Since most states distribute their electoral votes on a winner-take-all basis, the smaller party has no chance to gain support without seeming to take this support from one of the major parties. Few people will support a party that never wins, especially when they are supporting that party at the possible expense of their least favorite candidate taking power”…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays