Persuasive Essay On World Hunger

As I read this sentence to you, a child somewhere in this world will have died of hunger. A child. Children are the weakest of us, the ones who implicitly trust everyone, the ones whose innocence is genuine and appropriate and necessary--and they’re in the far corners of the world starving until their skin stretches across their bones and they don’t have the energy, the will, or the wherewithal to cry out anymore. You may think of them with a deep sympathy, or a gut-wrenching pang of guilt, or a simple understanding of their plight. The moment you stop being faced with whatever causes that guilt, these children slip your mind. They may not be in your thoughts, but they’re still starving until the deadly diseases which ravage their countries constitute sweet
In order to truly solve the problem of world hunger, not only must someone go to these countries to change their infrastructure and offer help, but you must keep them in mind so that their plight doesn’t end up
The starving out of people practically amounts to genocide, and is one of the most brutal ways to kill a person. The West holds the power to intervene in cases such as these. The West ignored the genocide in Rwanda, yet put millions of lives on the line to aid the Jews of Europe during WWII. Why? Europe isn’t a couple of backwater African countries that can’t offer anything--and Rwanda presents no threat to the West. The simple hand of sympathy knows no compensation, however, and if it cannot be extended to those in need then it is not sympathy at all. The UN needs to address the issues which plague the less fortunate countries of the world--hunger and violence on a massive scale. The UN needs to intervene, because every minute they deliberate, more people have died. The UN needs to learn to extend a hand of sympathy rather than leaving it to reporters and nonprofit organizations to fix conflicts of an international