Preview

Peter Singer: Appropriate Moral Obligation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
999 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer: Appropriate Moral Obligation
Exegetical
Peter Singer states that citizens of affluent nations are behaving immorally with the way they react to moral issues like helping those in need and our moral conceptual scheme needs to change. To do so, we need to be morally obligated to prevent bad things from happening if it does not require sacrificing something of comparable moral significance. His argument includes this principle where proximity or distance should not be taken into account when deciding whether to prevent something bad from happening. We should not discriminate against helping someone in getting out of a bad situation merely because they are far away from us. His justification for this is that the world is developing to become a global village and directing
…show more content…
I do not agree that his argument stands because it includes the principle that we should take no account of proximity or distance before we decide whether to provide aid to others and prevent something bad from happening. Although with a “global village”, our moral situation may be different as aid can now be more effectively distributed over distance, it does not mean that we are morally obligated to prevent bad things from happening without taking into account distance and proximity. This is because, there are factors caused by distance that may unintentionally cause us to sacrifice something of comparable moral importance when we try to prevent bad things that are far away from us from …show more content…
If we do not do everything in our power to help just because we think that our minimalized efforts meant that our moral obligations are lessened, this could lead to a world where no aid is being given at all to those who are suffering and far away from us. Also, with instant communication and a globalized network today, it is not difficult to source for credibility reports and for information on legal environments in the NGO’s country. Furthermore, in recent years, there are organizations like The Life You Can Save that promotes effective giving through the provision of a list of credible charities that effectively combat undesirable situations like poverty. The organization also includes a tool that allows potential donors to calculate the impact they are making on a person’s life based on the amount they donate. It is thus, not difficult to make well-informed decisions before deciding whether to help someone far

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    A moral compass is akin to that of an opinion, in that everyone has their own, and there is an extremely high probability that they are not all the same. In his famous article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer examines this concept in relation to what society believes that they are morally obligated to do, versus what may be morally-correct, but not necessarily mandatory. Singer places a particular focus on the affluent population and what he believes to be their duty to donate as much as possible to charities and relief organizations. Although his intentions are admirable, I believe that Singer’s views may sound good on paper, but are not plausible in the real world for three key reasons, including the extenuating factors…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Peter Singer's Argument

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages

    You've looked at a few things that present Peter Singer's argument against the way we use animals for food and other products. Pretend that you're talking to a friend and they ask you why Singer thinks it's wrong to eat a cheeseburger. Explain his argument (or what you take to be the core of his argument).…

    • 378 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nobody can say that they wouldn’t help someone who is close to them; well I hope so otherwise I really need to rethink my faith in humanity; I wouldn’t go and say that every single person in the world would jump into a lake to save someone but they would try their hardest to save someone in trouble. But like the analogy that Singer uses in his essay we are more likely to give money to charities that are helping people in our own country rather than some random people halfway across the world. That’s probably because we can actually see the effect of our donations and the disasters that the people have to face. Guilt consumes us until we give into the pressures of donating, whereas if we see an ad for a charity that is helping people in third world countries we have less of an emotional connection to them because it has no effect on our lives. Peter Singer states “Moral attitudes are shaped by the needs of society, no doubt society needs people who will observe the rules that make social existence tolerable…It is quite inessential, however to, help people outside one’s own society”(Singer, pg. 469).…

    • 1211 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer immediately encourages acceptance of his first moral standpoint with his comment: “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (413). At first, what he is asking seems very straight forward, but on closer examination, he is asking for a complete shift in our thinking and our existence. He supports this with the idea that distance makes no difference in our moral obligations. The old adage that charity begins…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Miller says that distance is not morally relevant and argues for “cosmopolitan care” which is a duty to care that can be global and concrete. She establishes that our mutual and inevitable interdependence gives rise to duty to care for the needs of others. Distance is not a morally relevant factor because “moral agents” are required…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine, for a moment, that you are in a lifeboat. The lifeboat has a limited capacity, say 60 people, and there are 50 people in it now. You are not aware of the capacity of the lifeboat. These 50 people in the boat represent rich Americans, or those with the means to donate to overseas charities. Outside of the boat swimming in the water there are some 100 people hoping to get in. Those are the relatively poor people in need of aid. As those people with means, we must make a decision on what to do. If we operate as Singer believes, we would sacrifice the small chance that the boat will become overcrowded in order to add another person and save a life. However, if we treat all lives as equal and try to add everyone, eventually the boat will capsize and everyone will receive the equal result of death. In order to be helpful to those swimming in the water, we must maintain our position in the boat. This extends to our wealth and donations. In order to maintain our position of being able to help those in need, we must in some way maintain our wealth and our lives of living above necessity. Certainly we assist those who are outside of the boat with the extra capacity that we have, but we do so in measure and not to an extreme. This also raises the question of who to choose to help, which Singer’s morality does not help us with. If…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Singer claims that by donating to aid agencies or charity organisations, who will in turn pass it on to the needy in other poorer parts of the world that desperately need these resources, we can help prevent the suffering and death that comes unnecessarily if not for that fact that they had the basic necessities that we can offer help with, and this is true on the basis that we could, as an affluent society, comfortably do since many of us need not an extra piece of clothing or car that can be considered indulgences, and it could have been better used as donations to help those suffering. While it sounds logical that the able should help the needy especially if it is not too bothersome to do so, Singer might not have considered the reality that exists in aid agencies and their practices, whereby even with the best intentions, the donations might not truly be delivered to the recipient, leading to the idea that his premise might not be as sufficiently thought out, perhaps due to the time when it was written, which was a time before there was an increase in awareness of corruption in regards to global aid to the needy, and this does not support his premise, that people would be saved if we were all obligated to do so as realistically speaking, we cannot guarantee it. Singer is right to claim that donation equals aid and decreased suffering and that aid agencies is one good way to help the needy directly, but it is difficult to fully conclude this would, together with the other premises, help prevent suffering and death as it is difficult to completely prevent an issue that is prevalent in many third world countries, aside from East Bengal, the main focus of his argument, as it is multi-faceted and complex in nature. The fact that the people living within these countries are unable to fend for themselves might not fully be due to merely external events such as wars and natural disasters, as part…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I, as a senior at Rutgers University, am one of hundreds of millions of people who could devote a substantial quantity of less money on things that do not boost any effectiveness but my own. For the equivalent quantity of money I spend on an iClicker, I could provide a family in Zimbabwe access to the basic necessities of life. Singer argues we have widespread obligations to the world's poor, but we can meet them without being deprived of all of our worldly assets and possessions. This essay aims to defend Singer's arguments that we, fitting a picture of absolute affluence, have a moral obligation to help those in poverty.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This is only if we assume from the very beginning that we have this enforceable duty to aid, which Stemplowska does. This duty to aid does come at a cost, of course. Stemplowska asserts that this duty to aid others and pick up the slack comes at no substantial cost (or unreasonable) cost to the person who is helping. So her argument is on a very even playing field, as any situation regarding an unreasonable cost is already thrown out of the discussion.…

    • 1581 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe that we are morally free to live the life we want and pursue our own interests, at least to some extent, and this entails that we are morally permitted to dedicate our energy, time, and capital to activates that don’t involve any direct impact on famine relief or similar causes.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Across the United States, everyday lives would change dramatically if Peter Singer’s theory was set in place. He brings to the reader’s attention that there is a difference between duty and charity. This thought…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages

    It is an irrefutable fact that we should help each other. However sometimes help to others poses some danger to either us or others. In Peter Singer's essay "Famine Affluence, and Morality" Peter Singer argues that we ought, morally, to prevent starvation due to famine. Singer begins by saying that assistance has been inadequate as richer countries prioritize development above preventing starvation. Singer then states that "suffering and death from lack of food, shelter, and medical care are bad" (404) and assumes that it is uncontroversial enough to be accepted without justification. He then next raises the linked premise that we morally ought to prevent something 'bad' from happening as long as we have the means and it does not entail compromising on anything of 'comparable moral significance', using the analogy of a drowning child and hence assuming the principle _of "_universalizability" (405). As Singer writes, he attempts to justify why he feels that it is within our means to do so without sacrificing anything morally significant, and concludes that we hence morally ought to prevent starvation due to famine.…

    • 876 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer Argument

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages

    1. In this paper I will argue that Singer is wrong to claim that human suffering and animal suffering should be given equal consideration. He claims that human animals and non-human animals with vertebrae experience pain and suffering in the same way. (41)…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arthur says, “our present moral code is morally reasonable and in need of no reform in the direction suggested by Singer” (Arthur, 846). Arthur goes in depth to explain and breakdown Singer’s principles and pick apart bits and pieces where Singer seems unreasonable with his requests. Arthur argues that we don’t even live up to the standards as they are so how can we raise the bar higher and expect us, human beings, to attain something so much higher than before. This leads into the idea, that also contradicts Singer, of not always giving away our money or food to the homeless and those who need it. Arthur uses an example of a hardworking farer and a lazy neighbor fisherman. The farmer worked all summer to grow his crops and have a surplus of food while his neighbor spent his whole summer fishing as leisure. The farmer should be able to keep his earnings because he worked for them and should not feel obligated to give them to his less wealthy fisherman neighbor. Arthur and Singer differ in their opinions on what we should do with that extra money/food we make, whether it’s better to give it up until we become just as poor or if it’s better to keep it all to…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    While many are drawn to charities because of morals and a sense of responsibility to help, and while that is a valuable desire, many do not consider the paternalistic aspects of their actions. The care for others never occurs between equals, inside American society it can be seen often in the care of the elderly, but also in how America interacts with other countries on an international scale. The paternalistic attributes could be minimalized though if in the process of giving, more agency was attributed to the recipients, unfortunately this is not the case in much of the foreign aid offered by…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays

Related Topics