Preview

Peter Singer Famine Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
518 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer Famine Summary
In his work called “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” Peter Singer raises the theme of morality in the modern fast-changing world by addressing socio-economic problems of East Bengal. According to Singer’s main argument, there is no justification to richer nations for not helping the countries such as Bangladesh. Generally, I agree with the statement provided. It is well-known that dying from famine is bad, wherever you live and with whatever social, economic and political problems you are facing. Also, proximity and distance are not morally relevant, due to the globalization, which makes a big contribution in the development of worldwide communication and transaction systems. In fact, the argument at nation level also can be considered as analogical for the individual level. For instance, as the philosopher claims, it should …show more content…
Besides, I have an opportunity to spend this money on watching a movie with my friends and taking pleasure from this action. Suppose that I will behave from morality and will not go to the cinema. Then, taking into the consideration Singer’s moral principles, every time I will have $10, I ought to make a decision whether to give it to the charity organizations or using for my own needs. The point is that the choice will repeat to oblige me to reduce my income level till I will became poor. Therefore, according to the Singer’s Principle, there is no significant difference between raising $10 for charity and helping a drowning child, as the philosopher claims that duty and charity is the same. However, in the modern society no one ought to raise his income for assisting someone who is suffering in another country, and no one will be penalized for not doing this action. To put in a nutshell, distinction of charity and obligation is eliminated and creates misunderstanding of the main

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “The singer Solution to World Poverty” Singer talks about the American movement and its connection to world poverty world poverty. Where he claims that the only solution to world poverty would be by donating money to charity and gives he point out amount of dollars that could save a child’s life. He talks about how people should not spend money on luxuries while they are children dying in the world and he says that those luxuries shouldn’t be more valuable than people’s lives. In His essay he talk about the two examples of how people should save a child life tends not to do so.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought that you are happier than many children in the world? On the other hand, they do not have enough good conditions to live and develop themselves, including poverty. How will they struggle for their lives with their small hands? They probably need our help to rescue them out of danger. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, which is written by Peter Singer, is a solution to save children's lives. Singer persuades the reader to participate in helping children who lack food, get many diseases, and do not have good living conditions. His argument is that all of us should contribute to saving the children’s lives According to “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, this solution totally has the ability to be done by our help; however, I am not completely persuaded that I will help children by following Single’s solution.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A moral compass is akin to that of an opinion, in that everyone has their own, and there is an extremely high probability that they are not all the same. In his famous article, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, Peter Singer examines this concept in relation to what society believes that they are morally obligated to do, versus what may be morally-correct, but not necessarily mandatory. Singer places a particular focus on the affluent population and what he believes to be their duty to donate as much as possible to charities and relief organizations. Although his intentions are admirable, I believe that Singer’s views may sound good on paper, but are not plausible in the real world for three key reasons, including the extenuating factors…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer immediately encourages acceptance of his first moral standpoint with his comment: “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it” (413). At first, what he is asking seems very straight forward, but on closer examination, he is asking for a complete shift in our thinking and our existence. He supports this with the idea that distance makes no difference in our moral obligations. The old adage that charity begins…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his essay, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, the author Peter Singer wrote a few hypothetical examples to prove his moral judgments, in which he tried to persuade the readers to give away all the money one spends on luxuries via the example of Bob, a man who spared the innocent kids life trying to save his valuable Bugatti. However, the example of Bob failed to convince me as a good analogy for other people.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Does Singer think there is an ethical difference between saving the girl in the puddle and saving a person's life in Bengal by giving a donation? With the understanding of reading the textbook, Singer feels that if it is in your power of to prevent something very bad from happening, then you ought to do so, without morally sacrificing anything else.…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Imagine, for a moment, that you are in a lifeboat. The lifeboat has a limited capacity, say 60 people, and there are 50 people in it now. You are not aware of the capacity of the lifeboat. These 50 people in the boat represent rich Americans, or those with the means to donate to overseas charities. Outside of the boat swimming in the water there are some 100 people hoping to get in. Those are the relatively poor people in need of aid. As those people with means, we must make a decision on what to do. If we operate as Singer believes, we would sacrifice the small chance that the boat will become overcrowded in order to add another person and save a life. However, if we treat all lives as equal and try to add everyone, eventually the boat will capsize and everyone will receive the equal result of death. In order to be helpful to those swimming in the water, we must maintain our position in the boat. This extends to our wealth and donations. In order to maintain our position of being able to help those in need, we must in some way maintain our wealth and our lives of living above necessity. Certainly we assist those who are outside of the boat with the extra capacity that we have, but we do so in measure and not to an extreme. This also raises the question of who to choose to help, which Singer’s morality does not help us with. If…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In this essay I argue that Singer’s principle is false as a moral obligation to prevent bad does not necessarily translate into the appropriate help needed for the recipients involved. My argument proceeds in four sections: In the first section, I articulate Singer’s argument. In the second section, I show that Singer’s argument is invalid as it relies on the premise that donation to charity organisations will prevent bad without considering the inadequacies of human nature and hence making it a false premise. In the third section, I offer a response on Singer’s behalf by explaining that the objection offered earlier is a slippery slope argument that relies on doomsday conclusions which are unrealistic in actuality.…

    • 1764 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Peter Singer Is Wrong

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Got a minute? Good! Because that may be all it takes to log in to OXFAM.org and virtually save someone’s life. But hold on a second, what about your life? Your own interests? All of the other beneficial things you could do with that money? According to Peter Singer, you don’t really have any choice because you’re “morally obligated” to donate far more resources to famine relief and similar causes than what you currently think is enough, but without sacrificing anything of equivalent moral importance. In this paper I will analyze this argument and try to show that Singer’s conclusions are correct, yet they are not quite as correct as he believes they are. To do so, I will try to show that Singer is wrong to think that we have a “moral obligation”…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Across the United States, everyday lives would change dramatically if Peter Singer’s theory was set in place. He brings to the reader’s attention that there is a difference between duty and charity. This thought…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    He argues that people have many different reasons to [delete] why they do not donate. His vision is that the people and the government should take care of the problem. He uses a great illustrative imaginative scenario. Basically, let’s say you are walking down the path by the local pond. You have just purchased a brand new pair of running pants worth $100. You see a young child drowning and screaming for help. You have a moral obligation to save that childs[‘s] life and you will sacrifice your brand new pants without question. The child’s life is worth more than your new pair of pants and you do not hesitate to ruin them for the child. Singer says it best, “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything else morally significant, we ought, morally, to do it.” (Singer, 1972) He is basically saying that if by saving that child you do not sacrifice anything, in this case the rescuer’s life, of equal moral importance you should do it.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arthur says, “our present moral code is morally reasonable and in need of no reform in the direction suggested by Singer” (Arthur, 846). Arthur goes in depth to explain and breakdown Singer’s principles and pick apart bits and pieces where Singer seems unreasonable with his requests. Arthur argues that we don’t even live up to the standards as they are so how can we raise the bar higher and expect us, human beings, to attain something so much higher than before. This leads into the idea, that also contradicts Singer, of not always giving away our money or food to the homeless and those who need it. Arthur uses an example of a hardworking farer and a lazy neighbor fisherman. The farmer worked all summer to grow his crops and have a surplus of food while his neighbor spent his whole summer fishing as leisure. The farmer should be able to keep his earnings because he worked for them and should not feel obligated to give them to his less wealthy fisherman neighbor. Arthur and Singer differ in their opinions on what we should do with that extra money/food we make, whether it’s better to give it up until we become just as poor or if it’s better to keep it all to…

    • 1415 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    (231) To further support this opinion, Singer gives an example of a situation in which a person sees a child drowning in a pond and whether they decide to save the child or make someone else do it. In Singer’s perspective, the person ought to save the child, while getting their clothes muddy, which isn’t as significant, compared to the child’s life. (231) Therefore, if a human being is physically near us and can use our assistance, we ought morally to help them.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays