Besides, I have an opportunity to spend this money on watching a movie with my friends and taking pleasure from this action. Suppose that I will behave from morality and will not go to the cinema. Then, taking into the consideration Singer’s moral principles, every time I will have $10, I ought to make a decision whether to give it to the charity organizations or using for my own needs. The point is that the choice will repeat to oblige me to reduce my income level till I will became poor. Therefore, according to the Singer’s Principle, there is no significant difference between raising $10 for charity and helping a drowning child, as the philosopher claims that duty and charity is the same. However, in the modern society no one ought to raise his income for assisting someone who is suffering in another country, and no one will be penalized for not doing this action. To put in a nutshell, distinction of charity and obligation is eliminated and creates misunderstanding of the main
Besides, I have an opportunity to spend this money on watching a movie with my friends and taking pleasure from this action. Suppose that I will behave from morality and will not go to the cinema. Then, taking into the consideration Singer’s moral principles, every time I will have $10, I ought to make a decision whether to give it to the charity organizations or using for my own needs. The point is that the choice will repeat to oblige me to reduce my income level till I will became poor. Therefore, according to the Singer’s Principle, there is no significant difference between raising $10 for charity and helping a drowning child, as the philosopher claims that duty and charity is the same. However, in the modern society no one ought to raise his income for assisting someone who is suffering in another country, and no one will be penalized for not doing this action. To put in a nutshell, distinction of charity and obligation is eliminated and creates misunderstanding of the main