Preview

Peter Singer Poverty

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1157 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Peter Singer Poverty
“It is a tragic mix-up when the United States spends $500,000 for every enemy soldier killed, and only $53 annually on the victims of poverty”, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. This fact indicates how poverty is an issue that needs more attention because of it’s significant impact on the people in the world. Peter Singer, an Australian humanist and philosopher, addresses the dilemma of poverty world-wide in his essay, The Singer Solution to Poverty. Singer argues how it is wrong for an individual to live well without giving substantial amounts of money to help people who are hungry, malnourished, and dying from easily treatable illnesses. In the matter of defending and qualifying Singer’s argument, people should be more aware of the issue of poverty. …show more content…
This person may be spending ridiculously large amounts of money on useless, fanciful items that would come to benefit less in his life. Thus, lies the conclusion that the person is stuck in the world of materialism. Singer believes that not giving to the poor and needy person is as bad as the killing them. In a way, Singer is correct in his theory. When a person does not give to the poor and spends his money on extra items to satisfy himself, a poor, unfortunate person dies of hunger in Africa. The money that person used on himself could have been used to feed a poor man in Africa, who perished in starvation. Interestingly enough, the person spent the money on something he WANTED, not something he desperately NEEDED. It was not food or shelter the person yearned for, it was a material possession he wanted because of his selfish desires. According to the Millennium Project established by the UN, more than 800 million people go to bed hungry every day, 300 million are children. If more people were well-aware of this fact, they would put more effort into helping people with these kinds of problems. The most effective method to publicize recognition of the issue of poverty would be if ignorant-wealthy people were put in the circumstances of being poor. It would be then, when they would experience the harsh reality of the life lead by …show more content…
There are limitless options in helping poverty. Helping just one person in need is enough, however one must ask: How many people are willing to help? To make a world-wide difference on poverty, many people must be willing to help. Abdul Edhi, a well-known philanthropist of Pakistan, lives the simplest life one can imagine in Pakistan. He raises and funds massive amounts of money for the poor, yet he, himself, lives a simple, plain life. He sacrificed most of his worldly pleasures to dedicate himself to helping the poor. If there were more people like Edhi, imagine how much change will come to the world. People who are oblivious to poverty, do not have much knowledge about poverty, and how it plays an important role in affecting other issues as well. People need to be more aware of poverty in that sense because poverty affects numerous other places as well. Poverty negatively affects education, economy, society, and most importantly, the people of the country. When a person is poor, he has trouble providing education for himself because he is too busy thinking about how to feed his family and himself. He desperately needs a job, but works as a laborer instead, since this job requires less skill. He asks for some people in society to help him, but they are too absorbed in their own work to even notice his cries for help. This explains how poverty really affects

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In “The singer Solution to World Poverty” Singer talks about the American movement and its connection to world poverty world poverty. Where he claims that the only solution to world poverty would be by donating money to charity and gives he point out amount of dollars that could save a child’s life. He talks about how people should not spend money on luxuries while they are children dying in the world and he says that those luxuries shouldn’t be more valuable than people’s lives. In His essay he talk about the two examples of how people should save a child life tends not to do so.…

    • 332 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Have you ever thought that you are happier than many children in the world? On the other hand, they do not have enough good conditions to live and develop themselves, including poverty. How will they struggle for their lives with their small hands? They probably need our help to rescue them out of danger. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, which is written by Peter Singer, is a solution to save children's lives. Singer persuades the reader to participate in helping children who lack food, get many diseases, and do not have good living conditions. His argument is that all of us should contribute to saving the children’s lives According to “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, this solution totally has the ability to be done by our help; however, I am not completely persuaded that I will help children by following Single’s solution.…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer’s Solution to World Poverty. “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” is an article by Peter Singer which presents a compelling argument for the American people to take responsibility in addressing the global poverty issue. Though Singer employs a variety of rhetorical strategies such as ethos, pathos, and logos to strengthen his argument, Singer fails to persuade the American people to his side, instead alienating his audience due to his extreme use of pathos and a lack of adequate ethos and logos. Throughout the article,.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Singer calculates that “$200 in donations would help a sickly 2-year-old transform into a healthy 6-year-old” (Singer 2). No one would say that spending money to help a child in need is wasteful; however, preserving the child’s life would not save it from poverty. The child would be alive, but it would still grow up poor and uneducated, and, in all likelihood, its children would be the same. Singer’s solution for poverty is, in all actuality, not a solution at all. His ideas would be great for lowering the fatality rate due to malnourishment or diseases, but he gives no solution to adequately deliver the world from poverty. Donating to children-saving charities, while honorable, does not do much in fixing the problem at hand, worldwide…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer outlines his argument for helping those in need in the global community. His main argument is that humans can stop suffering based on our moral decisions.1 Singer calls for the definition of ‘charity’ in our society to have moral implications. People should give governmental and privately. all need to give to charity and all at the same time.…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer thinks we are too selfish with our money. In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, he proposes a solution to poverty in other countries. Singer believes that money that might otherwise be used for luxury goods should be donated to charities that help save lives in poorer countries. He believes that this decision increase overall happiness more than the purchase of a luxury good, like new shoes, would. While Singer’s argument raises an important moral point, it leads to a very dangerous moral precedent that could leave the problem worse off than before. Singer’s argument should be taken in a limited scope to help determine right action; otherwise, it becomes a radical doctrine.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    For those who frightened much to abandon their life, goals, projects and interests in order to save one’s life, say goodbye to righteousness. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, also in “ the life you can save”, Peter Singer tries to show that we human beings have a moral obligation to give far more than we actually do for excessive and tragic situations such as famine and disaster relief. According to singer, Giving, sharing and helping the needy is more than moral happiness and inner satisfaction, it is a moral duty. As he state his argument in three premises, “1, suffering and death from the lack of food, shelter and medical care are bad, (2), if it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening,…

    • 1598 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Singer suggests that Americans should donate all of the money they are spending on luxuries, not necessities, to the world’s poor. His argument seems simple and straight forward, but there are several unanswered questions. What is the cause of world poverty? What would this do to the American economy?…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Peter Singer’s “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” he argues that when people abroad are suffering or dying from lack of food, shelter or medicine, it is wrong for people here to spend money on morally unimportant things rather than giving money to help (Hughes). This means that we have a moral obligation to do what we can to alleviate the stress of poverty abroad if it does not do any harm to us helping them. If we are able to benefit people abroad, we should do so. Food, shelter, and quality healthcare are things that should be seen as basic necessities; therefore, not only do we have a moral obligation to help those abroad in need, but we should also have the want to help those in need. Although Singer asserts this claim, he does identify…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his article “Famine, Affluence and Morality” Peter Singer gives a seemingly devastating critique of our ordinary ways of thinking about famine relief, charity, and morality in general. In spite of that very few people have accepted, or at any rate acted on, the conclusions he reaches. In light of these facts one might say of Singer’s arguments, as Hume said of Berkeley’s arguments for immaterialism, that “… they admit of no answer and produce no conviction.”[1] While I do think that Singer’s considerations show that people should do considerably more than most people actually do, they do not establish his conclusions in their full strength or generality. So his arguments admit of a partial answer, and once properly qualified may produce some conviction.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Is it possible to quantify our charitable burden? In the following essay, Singer offers some unconventional thoughts about the ordinary American's obligations to the world's poor and suggests that even his own one-fifth standard may not be enough.…

    • 3113 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving your money to the poor or to charity organizations may sound easy enough, but in practice it is basically impossible. Peter Singer, in his recent NY Times article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” argues that the rich should donate whatever luxuries and whatever money they don’t’ need all to the less prosperous. Many would argue both for and against such a viewpoint, and such a “solution” would require evaluation of its pros and cons before application.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the comment that Peter Singer’s argument that individuals should donate to alleviate poverty and save lives does not address the underlying structural socioeconomic causes of poverty. His argument for a redistribution of wealth on an individual basis still operates under an economic system where there is an unequal distribution of wealth. As a result, even if individuals donate money, poorer countries will always be reliant on these wealthier countries and individuals for survival resulting in an increased power imbalance. However, I also think that it is important not to disregard these contributions to people in poverty simply because they do not fix the system, as these contributions do have the power to save and improve lives…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Can you imagine that if you do not donate to charity, people treat you as a murderer? Peter Albert David Singer is an Australian moral philosopher, professor at Princeton University and utilitarian, who fights against poverty. There is a side of society that often goes unseen by the middle and upper classes—a side ridden with poverty and misfortune. In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” Singer calls on the prosperous to provide for the less fortunate. But this belief seems like a burden to the wealthy and justice is doubtful. Professor reveals that he donates to charity 20% of an income, but proposes people donate 40% and it makes the readers wonder. In the article, he attempts to convince Americans to donate more then they are giving away at this time. Singer’s solution is an absurd; because it can negatively affect the country’s economy, reduce people’s desire to work, and cause corruption among charity organizations.…

    • 1495 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “It is a tragic mix-up when the United States spends $500,000 for every enemy soldier killed, and only $53 annually on the victims of poverty.” This is a famous quote said by Martin Luther King, Junior. This goes to show that there has been insufficient attention given to the pressing issue of poverty. Rich nations have always been giving aid to poor nations, but there have been arguments of whether rich nations should continue to provide aid for poor nations since it reap negative consequences and aid not reaching the correct group. However, it is not possible for rich nations to stop giving aid as poor nations will be unable to survive on its own.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays