Preview

Phaedrus's Second Speech

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
643 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Phaedrus's Second Speech
Phaedrus: The Three Speeches
First Speech The first speech we come across in Plato’s Phaedrus is that of Lysias which is read by Phaedrus. In his speech, which starts at Stefanus 231a, Lysias argues that a person should reject the advances of a lover and accept those of a non-lover. His reasons are that lovers are ‘sick’ and irrational (231d) and are often jealous and chaotic (232c&d). Once love is absent, the relationship can be treated as a transaction of sorts where the non-lover gets sexual pleasure and the beloved becomes a better person (233a). Second Speech In the second speech, Socrates is the one speaking. He starts out by weaving a story of a young man who has a cunning lover that deceives the young man into thinking that his lover does not love him (237b). He decides to first define the meaning of love. ‘Love is a form of desire’ (237d) but both the lover and non-lover engage in desire so there must be a dividing factor. There are two forces which rule and guide men: an “inborn desire for pleasures” and an “acquired judgment that pursues what is best” (237d). These forces interact with each other and when desire is in control, it leads to excess and when the judgement is in control, it leads to moderation (237e&238a).
The lover has an excessive desire for beauty and this is what makes him mad,
…show more content…
He claims that the two prior speeches are incorrect because madness is not always bad therefore the lover is not bad simply because he is mad (244a). He claims that madness can be a gift from the gods and gives examples of good types of madness: madness from prophetesses and priestesses who guide people (244b&c), madness of people who take refuge in prayers and serving gods in order to find relief from their afflictions (244e), madness from the Muses which arouses and fills the soul with a Dionysiac frenzy to make poetry and songs (245a) and Love, which he attempts to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Does Phaedrus Make?

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    6. According to Diotima, what is the goal of the lover of the beautiful? Why?…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Plato’s Symposium each philosopher shared a different version of love when they gave their speech. First of all, Phaedrus expressed that love was the oldest of all gods and the one that does the most to promote virtue in people. Second, the strangest speech of the night came from Aristophanes; he expressed love in the form of a mythical story. Here is a quote from part of Aristophanes speech on his version of love, “We are twice the people we are now, and the gods were jealous, Zeus decided to cut us in half to reduce our power, and ever since we had been running all over the earth trying to rejoin with our other half. When we do, we cling to that other half with all our might, and we call this love.” (Aristophanes…

    • 182 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading "The Speech of Callicles" I noticed that Philosophers were not what I originally thought they were. I have always pictured them being men who were ahead of there time. Who were searching for the answers to life. In the first paragraph these beliefs I once had about philosophy were changed. Callicles states that Philosophers would get into pointless arguments about the problems of everyday life rather than look for the truth. They would also attempt to make a man who doesn't study philosophy but studies practical affairs second guess himself. No matter what side of the argument the man would speak about the philosopher would take the other side. The distinction made in paragraph one is that nature and custom are antagonistic to each other. Nature being the order and behavior of all living things that make up the universe, and custom meaning the everyday habits that have fallen upon society. I feel that they are…

    • 1160 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    At one point during a philosophical debate between Socrates and Phaedo, Phaedo attempts to compares the human body to a lyre and the soul to the lyre’s harmony. Socrates, however, argues that this an inaccurate comparison. He explains that a harmony can be more and more fully harmonized or less and less fully harmonized, to which Phaedo confirms. Socrates then claims that a soul cannot be neither more nor less of a soul than another, a fact which Phaedo also confirms. Consequently, if the harmony of a lyre were to represent the human soul, then the harmony of all lyres must be the same, since no soul is greater nor lesser than another. Now, if virtue represents harmony and wickedness disharmony, then all souls must have the same amount of virtue…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Men who are capable of real action first make their plans and then go forward without hesitation while their enemies have still not made up their minds.” ― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War. If there was ever a more accurate quote to describe Alcibiades, this out shone it. Through his manipulation, impressive persuasion, and eagerness to be on the winning side, Alcibiades, son of Cleinias, was able to become a prominent figure in the Peloponnesian war.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the Second Dialogue between Philonous and Hylas, Philonous defends his philosophy that there is no such thing as matter and concludes that God is the ultimate cause of all our ideas. However, I have different opinions on Philonous’ claim that all ideas come from God.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    His “proof” of Love’s ability to inspire creativity is based on a generalized statement rather than a solid, and universally accepted truth: “[Love] has only to touch a person and, ‘however coarse he was before’ he becomes a poet.” (195b-195c). By referring to his own art-form, somewhat like Eryximachus does in his speech, Agathon is attempting to add substance to his argument. Ironically, however, the fact that his “proof” is based on so abstract a concept as poetry rebounds and emphasizes the demagoguery he is using to create his speech. In a sense, Agathon is building his ideas off of his first-hand experiences as a poet and as a creative human being.…

    • 1627 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both Boethius (the author) and plato agree that love strive for goodness. Plato gave us an example of what true love suppose to look alike in Alcibiades’ speech given in the symposium. Recall how Alcibiades demonstrate that Socrates was the greatest lover through his speech in which he praises Socrates for loving him and searching goodness for his soul. This was what lady philosophy was aiming at, that although all the wealth are gone, true friends will stay and the fact that they are striving for beauty by desiring the goodness of your soul, by loving you beyond what you have is true love and that is true fortune and that is also beauty. This is what Boethius (the prisoner) longs for in his last standard of the poem by stating that “How happy is the human race, if love, by which the heavens are ruled to rule men’s minds is set in place” (pg…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The symposium is one of the foundational documents of Western culture and arguably the most profound analysis and celebration of love in the history of philosophy. It is also the most lavishly literary of Plato’s dialogues – a genius prose performance in which the author, like playful maestro, shows off an entire repertoire of characters, ideas,…

    • 2304 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Quadis S Speech

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Elizabethan Europe, Jews were seen as the lowest class of society, and were discriminated against to extreme degrees. Around the 1000s Jews lived in Europe amongst everyone else,and did not live in ghettos. A Jew was often wealthy, and many became money lenders in their societies. Because of their jobs, they often had to be their own debt collectors as well. This led to much resentment against them, and the views on Jews were starting to turn negative. As time went on, these views became more religious. As it is stated by Jami Rogers, "In the late 12th century, preparation for the Third Crusade brought a heightened level of anti-Jewish sentiment. Anti-Semitic violence culminated in two massacres, one at the coronation of Richard I in 1189, when 30 Jews were killed, and the other in 1190 in the city of York, when 150 Jews were massacred." (Rogers 2) The resentment of activity by a small concentrated amount of Jews began to spread to the religious group as a whole as the Third Crusade approached. Jews were also extradited from society together, much like black people in early America. Jews were seen as inferior to other religions, mainly Christians. They were even seen as less than human to an extent. Jews were regularly insulted, mistreated, and all around hated all because of there religion. This anti-Jew nature brought about many laws against them, such as if a man in debt dies, his family does not have to pay off the Jew.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Euthypyro

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First step of Socrates is that he said to Euthyphro god-loved is not the same as the pious nor the pious the same as the god-loved. At first he divide two terms and then second step is that he said the pious is being loved for this reason. I think he means that for some reasons we act or do something because of such actions we are being loved by gods. And then he adds some extras; “But it is not pious because it is being loved.” He means that they are different; the pious is the pious, being loved is being loved and god-loved is god-loved. Third step of Socrates is that being loved is not god-loved because god-loved is god-loved. Actually he means, I think, they have own definition and none of them define what piety is. Therefore, he conclude, “ If the god-loved and the pious were the same, then if the pious was being loved because it was pious, the god-loved would also be being loved because it was god-loved; and if the god-loved was god-loved because it was being loved by gods, then the pious would also be pious because it was being loved by the gods.”(11-b)…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates is known as the lover of wisdom and the lover of beauty. His speech is a response to Agathon who comically states that love is beautiful and young, the opposite of Socrates. Socrates inquires is love considered to be a love of something or of nothing? He compares that to how a father is a father to his children and a brother is a brother to his siblings. Socrates expresses that love’s desire suggests that one does not own what he or she loves. Socrates further explains this by giving the example of a healthy man having the desire to remain healthy. One’s desire for things is for the future. The desire rests in the preservation and not the lack thereof. This statement of love being a love of something shows that there is a connection…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love in Romeo and Juliet is presented almost as a disease that makes you physically ill and that makes you behave in a foolish way.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Love

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Love for another often hides a greater love for oneself” By a close comparison of your two texts, discuss the representation of sex and seduction.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The conversation between Socrates and Alcibiades continues with them talking about how the soul is separate from the body. There is nothing that has more authority than the soul within the body. Socrates then states that people who know their parts of the body know what belongs the them, but not themselves. This means that their body parts are for their bodies, but they body parts do not belong to the soul. Again. Socrates brings up that people who tend to their bodies tend to what belongs to them rather than what belongs to themselves. This helps Socrates bring up the point that the person who loves the body is someone who who loved something that belonged to the body, but Socrates is the one who loves Alcibiades’ soul and not his body. Love is loving another person’s soul as long as they are making progress. The person who loves Alcibiades soul will not leave him unlike the people who love the body. Socrates will love him unless he became corrupt and ugly. The body changes and the soul continues to grow. Socrates points out that he is…

    • 665 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays