Preview

Philip Morris - Kraft Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1990 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philip Morris - Kraft Case
”Philip Morris - Kraft” Case
Nurettin Y¨cesu (10516099) - Pınar Dilhan Eldemir (10652007) u April 25, 2011

1

Introduction

In this case, we will analyse how a hostile takeover creates benefits for both parties. The hostile takover approach can be considered as ”taking over a company with a hostile manner” but with the offers and deals, it becomes a solution to many different structures within the company. The decisionmaking through a case as this requires experienced, rational management skills to take the right position with a right choice. The one of the world’s biggest packed food company, Kraft Foods Inc. has so many innovations and mergers on the same sector. Kraft has been started to work on the cheese sector and generated many enterpreneurships of their own sector. This shows us how Kraft is a profitable company and their management tries to stimulate the market share of the company which is reaching the top. Also they are considered that one of the biggest prime company in the world. Mostly, the products of Kraft are based on packed food. Their well-known brands are: Cracker Barrel Natural Cheese, Miracle Whip salad dressing, Velveeta process Cheese, Breyers, Philadelphia Cream Cheese, Parkay and numerous others. While the food industry is on its way to the rise, Kraft generated a power in the institutional food market and create a value on manifacturind and marketing. They also created a strategy to diversify the firms and sectors related food market into the core business line such as dairy foods, snack foods and convenience foods and beverages. Kraft was successful in their industry and has acquired many firms which are in the similar business line like international, domestic and consumer food. However Kraft has decided to make an acquisiton with an firm which 1

has unrelated products. They merged with Dart Industries which is founder of Duracell Batteries brand in 1980. Kraft and subsidiaries of Dart operated independently. Perhaps, it would not

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    History: Federal Trade Commission instituted a deceptive advertising proceeding against Kraft Inc. Kraft was instructed to terminate certain ads due to false advertising.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Businesses typically generate a strategy to help their plan become a reality as they began to put it in motion. Some strategies work out for the better of the organization and some strategies have to be reevaluated. Strategies are formed on either a business, corporate, or international level. Throughout the world, there are billions of businesses that function using different strategies.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership is the main factor influencing the success of takeovers and mergers because Staff who has strong leadership skills will motivate and insipre other employees to achieve the goals and objectives of the firm. This is well illustrated in the acquisition made by Kellogg’s. One of the key factors influencing the succes of Kellogg’s severals acqusition, was The CEO John a Bryant’s leadership skills as, he held direct responsibility for managing the planning and execution teams for the integration of Keeble Food Company in 2001, this has been a success takeovers in the short term and the long term as he has created many different synergies whose revenue synergy which was just under $4 billion more. This has been made because Kellogg’s is driven by a democratic leadership approach as the company engage discussions with their employees before taking them implanted communication programm to empower his workforce. The business believes in the value of the their employees and therefore rewards them for how well they perform. This allows the firm to have a very motivated workforce and thus a very productive one, it also inspires them to work harmoniously with Keeble Food Company ’s employees and culture and produce synergies. Futhermore, this was the case in the Pringle’s acquisition by Kellog’s. Originaly Procter & Gamble wanted to sell Pringle’s to Diamonds but due to account’s problems, the deal failed. Kellogg’s responded very quickly to that and made an offer to the American company. This show that the CEO of Kellogg’s has reacted very rapidly as he saw an huge opportunity for his firm to growth externally as this merger would help to achieve Kellogg’s…

    • 1269 Words
    • 37 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Cadbury Takeover

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Moeller, S. (2012) Case Study: Kraft’s Takeover of Cadbury, Financial Times [online], 9 January, Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/1cb06d30-332f-11e1-a51e-00144feabdc0.html [Accessed 27 February 2012]…

    • 2635 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Case 9 Rogers Chocolates

    • 3277 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In this paper, the team analyses the case of Rogers’ Chocolates to introduce the company,…

    • 3277 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Smucker's Essay

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages

    1) Smucker’s corporate strategy is to build a portfolio of brands that are sold in the center of every grocery store. They plan to execute this strategy through the organic growth of their products, the development and introduction of new products, and by acquiring brands. The majority of Smucker’s brands share two strategy elements. First, they are ‘middle of the store’ processed foods. Second, they are often high margin products. Another common element among the brands they acquired is the fact that the brands were all industry leading name brands before they were acquired. Such acquisitions were beneficial to the firm not only by diversifying their product line-up, but it gave the firm more leverage when dealing with chain retailers. The type of products they diversified into made sense for the firm as it did not go against their corporate strategy. Any brands that went against the strategy were divested.…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wonk Potato Chips

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As a company changes its market structure it can mean major changes. Major changes that can be made can not only affect the company its self but businesses that work with the company as well as consumers. Throughout this paper I will be discussing a potato chip company that has changed its market structure and what affects this change has made on the company, businesses that work with the company, and consumers.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nestlé was the first mover in the ethnic food category with its Contadina pasta product. It has pre-empted Kraft which was representing the potential competitor in the category. With the objective of maintaining a 2:1 share ratio, Contadina has taken benefit from first mover advantage to maximize its market share and to establish its brand reaching $150 millions in retail sales in 1990. Nestlé purchase of Lambert’s cheese and Pasta Company was the key element to succeed in the competition with Kraft, it takes advantage from the technical and marketing background of the already established company in fresh food. The competition between Kraft and Nestlé continue in the fresh pizza product line, and it adds more pressure for both companies to reduce time to market and to get the first mover advantage. Extending NRFC portfolio to pizza product line was a normal step to get access to the $16.2 billion market. Pizza consumption culture was already well established with estimated 76% all US families had purchased pizza from restaurant within the previous six month and 60% of pizzas were eaten at home. For this reason NRFC was aiming to build its business by gaining delivered and takeout market shares.…

    • 2320 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recently, as you know group interest to hold a conference discussing taco shells case. They found that taco shells contain GMO. Also, you know that these taco shells are sold by Kraft Inc. but they branded it with taco bell. This recall will not affect your investment in the taco bell restaurant. This is will only affect the stores not the restaurant.…

    • 231 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mcdonald's Case Analysis

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages

    About everyone at some age, at some point or another, and in some country has gotten a sample of American's symbol for fast food through the golden arches of McDonald's. This report will attempt to analyze the external and internal sectors that affect the company's success. The external analysis will provide opportunities and threats while the internal analysis will show indicators of strength and weakness. It will then follow up with critical issues, strategic alternatives, recommendations and implementation. The case studied is found in Appendix 2 of Mary Coulter's "Strategic Management in Action" book.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    YUM Brand

    • 4307 Words
    • 12 Pages

    This work analyse Yum Brands, one of the major and leading companies in the global quick service restaurant (QSR) industry. Through some tools the author has examined deeply this fast food firm regarding the internal situation (SWOT), the external environment (PESTEL) and the stakeholders involved in the industry (Porter’s 5 Forces)…

    • 4307 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Barney, J.B., (1995) ‘Looking inside for competitive advantage’, Academy of Management Executive, 9 (4), pp 49‐61. Retrieved from: http://sfxhosted.exlibrisgroup.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/lpu?title=academy+of+management+executiv e&volume=9&issue=4&spage=49&date=1995 (Accessed: December13, 2012) Barnes, R., (2010), 'Battle of the brands ', Marketing (00253650), p. 16, Business Source Complete Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=55434184&site =ehost‐live&scope=site (Accessed: May 18, 2013) BBC (2011) Still 'Innocent ' despite Coca‐Cola deal: BBC RADIO [Online], Available from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_9387000/9387619.stm (Accessed: May 16, 2013) Coca‐Cola acquires majority stake in Innocent smoothies (2010), Beverage Industry, 101, (5), p. 12, Business Source Complete. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=53293274&site =ehost‐live&scope=site (Accessed: May 18, 2013) 'If Innocent Drinks sells a stake to Coca‐Cola, will it harm the brand? '(2009), Marketing (00253650), p. 24, Business Source Complete. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=40085125&site =ehost‐live&scope=site (Accessed: May 18, 2013) The Independent: Business Analysis (2009) Slaughter of the Innocent? Or is Coke the real deal? [Online] Available from: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/analysis‐and‐ features/slaughter‐of‐the‐innocent‐or‐is‐coke‐the‐real‐deal‐1667412.html (Accessed: May 17, 2013) Sweney, M.. (6 April 2009) ‘Innocent drinks offer a taste to Coca‐Cola’, The Guardian [Online]. Available from: http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/apr/06/innocent‐drinks‐sell‐stake‐coca‐ cola (Accessed: May 18, 2013) Vrontis, D., & Sharp, I., (2003), 'The Strategic Positioning of Coca‐Cola in their Global Marketing Operation ', Marketing Review, 3, (3), pp. 289‐309, Business Source Complete. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.liv.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11013117&site =eds‐live&scope=site (Accessed: May 16, 2013)…

    • 1162 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Newell case

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Newell, manufacturer and marketer of basic home and hardware products, is a rather unrelated diversified company with more than 30 operating businesses. Grown over the years through many acquisitions, the company is facing one of her most important challenge: the acquisition of Calphalon (high-quality cookware) and Rubbermaid (plastic products). Both the acquisition were part of that period’s CEO’s plan to increase Newell’s strength on the market, and to boost the capitalization to $10 billion, in order to reach higher EPS and, in so doing, create more value for shareholders. Calphalon is a private high-end aluminum cookware manufacturer, distributed in department and specialty stores and with a new developing product line for the mass retailer Target. Analyzing Calphalon’s issues, it comes out that its acquisition by Newell (consisting in a process of related diversification) would create value for both companies. In fact we must consider all the valuable things that this cookware manufacturer has to offer to its acquirer and vice versa: new channels where to sell premium products, that is to say non-mass merchandise markets, without cannibalizing Newell’s products sold in mass retailer stores (remember that Newell owns other cookware manufacturers); enhancement of competitive advantage through skills sharing, like Calphalon’s expertise in developing pull strategies and building strong connection with final consumers; strengthen Newell’s reputation by acquiring a prestigious brand name, thus not only functional objects, but also emotional ones; existence of a still profitable market in which other competitors haven’t reached a real leading position yet. About this last point, it’s important to highlight that the acquisition by Newell is fundamental for Calphalon in order to reduce its prices, always 20% higher than its main competitor Mayer. According to the theory, if the diversification has solid foundation, it allows to…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cadbury Schweppes Case Study

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages

    In late October 2002, Sir John Sunderland, chairman and CEO of Cadbury Schweppes, contemplated the future of his global confectionery and beverage company. Over the previous decade, the company had made several acquisitions to complement its portfolio of chocolate, soft drinks, sugar confectionery (candy), and gum. Now it was considering a bid for Adams, the number two player in the worldwide gum business and, with its Halls brand, a leader in sugar confectionery. After researching the acquisition for many months, his Chief Strategy Officer Todd Stitzer and the Adams deal team were approaching the point of no return. Sunderland knew that they would have to bid more than $4 billion to have any chance of winning Adams. Should they go ahead with the offer and if so, was all debt financing of the bid appropriate? At this lofty price, how certain could the Cadbury Schweppes’ team be that they could create value? He wondered, was the strategy behind the acquisition sound, and could the leadership team successfully execute an acquisition and integration plan of this magnitude? (Exhibits 1, 1a, and 2).…

    • 12635 Words
    • 51 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    The paper will have four main parts. In the first part, we provide a brief introduction of the company, McDonald’s, and the lawsuit. In the second part, we will use the concepts learned in class to analyze Happy Meal’s influencing strategies and the organizational changes during and after the suit. We believe that Happy Meal’s influencing strategies deserve our attention as they were the main causes of the crisis. Since its Happy Meal’s influencing tactics were so effectively and successfully executed, McDonald’s became the obvious target of the mentioned…

    • 4655 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Best Essays