Preview

Philip Zimbardo's Influence On Social Psychology

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
735 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Philip Zimbardo's Influence On Social Psychology
Philip Zimbardo once said, “My early childhood prepared me to be a social psychologist.” Born in a Bronx ghetto on March 23, 1933, Zimbardo is no stranger to crimes and aggression. Growing up, he has even seen his own friends commit felonies throughout their lives. Raised in events like the Great Depression, World War 2, and the Cold War may have influenced his friends to engage in illegal activity. These major events have also shaped Zimbardo’s views on the world. The time in which Philip was raised along with his family being immigrants from Sicily, provided no chance for his parents to receive an education of their own. This made Zimbardo the “the first member of his family to attend college” (musking ). He graduated Brooklyn College with …show more content…
Zimbardo is one who has adapted the branch of social psychology. His biggest contribution is his 1971 Stanford prison experiment which was created to research the effects situational forces have on human demeanor (verywell). This was Philip’s main area of focus in his career. “In the study, 24 male university students were randomly assigned to act as ‘prisoners’ or ‘guards’ in a mock prison” (famous). The experiment didn’t last for more than a week due to the drastic change in behavior shown by all the students. Some emotions shown were depression, cruelty, anxiety, stress, and rage. He writes that “Evil consists in intentionally behaving in ways that harm, abuse, demean, dehumanize, or destroy innocent others—or using one’s authority and systemic power to encourage or permit others to do so on your behalf. In short, it is “knowing better but doing worse” (book). The prison set-up along with some people being given authority and others being forced to listen “demonstrated how extreme situations can provoke uncharacteristic behavior” (apa). After the experiment, the students went back to their normal behaviors after a few days which further proves that situational forces were the cause of the drastic change. Besides his prison experiment he has also studied “shyness, madness, violence/evil, persuasion, dissonance, hypnosis, and teaching”(musk). Zimbardo …show more content…
The Stanford Prison Experiment data was still very important after 40 years when news about the Abu Ghraib military abuse scandal come out. In his book “The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil” Zimbardo writes “It seemed inconceivable that American soldiers were tormenting, humiliating, and torturing their captives by forcing homoerotic poses upon them….Were these the fine men and women sent overseas by the pentagon on the glorious mission of bringing democracy and freedom to an Iraq recently liberated from the tyrant/torturer Saddam Hussein?” (book). The prison experiment showed how honorable men and women can be cruel and sadistic. Along with helping understand the Abu Ghraib military abuse, Zimbardo has been busy helping make the world better. He created the Shyness clinic in 1977 which is still standing today (Famous). The shyness clinic was made to help people overcome their shyness in public places. Zimbardo is also founder and director of the Heroic Imagination Project which is “a non-profit organization aimed at understanding and promoting everyday heroism” (verywell). He is attempting to improve individuals’ mindset to achieve extraordinary feats in which would provide the world with more incredible deeds. In the bigger picture, Zimbardo is focusing on making the world a better place by promoting humans to engage in heroism, helping people get over shyness, and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1971, psychologist Phillip Zimbardo set out to create an experiment that looked at the impact of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. The experiment was to test human behavior when one's role had been altered into authoritative one. Still powerful after all these years the experiment was the most powerful and popular experiment of all time (O'Toole, K). Researches set up a mock prison in the basement of Stanford University building. There were the 24 students out of 70 volunteers chosen to play the roles of the prisoners or prison guards.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Was it ethical to do the prison study in the way that Zimbardo conducted it? Why or why not? Explain your position substantively.…

    • 352 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo’s mock prison experiment yielded the conclusion that individual behavior is largely under the control of social forces and environmental contingencies rather than personality traits, character, and will power. His findings were shown through the change in the pretend prison guards’ behavior over a matter of days. Their total demeanor was transformed and they became the role they were playing, with tyrannical and abusive actions towards the prisoners. The prison guards’ power went to their heads and corrupted them, much like what happened in the case of ordinary soldiers torturing prisoners. Like the prison guards, the soldiers were ordinary until they were put into a role of power. The environment of the prison with no structure or set rules changed the soldiers’ demeanors and caused them to throw their morals aside for limitless power over other human…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the infamous experiment in the history of psychology was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Its creator, Dr. Zimbardo, main objective was to see what effects would occur when a psychological experiment into human nature was performed. As I began to perform some research of my own, I noticed that my thoughts on the matter were similar to many; that as a scientific research project, Mr. Zimbardo’s experiment it was a complete failure. However, his findings did provide us with something that was much more important that is still being talked about today; insight into human psychology and social behavior.…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This study is considered a classic when with regards to prison psychology. According to the American Psychological Association (2004) “Its messages have been carried in many textbooks in the social sciences, in classroom lectures across many nations, and in popular media renditions. Its web site has gotten over 15 million unique page views in the past four years, and more than a million a week in the weeks following the expose of the abuse of Iraqi prisoners by American Military Police army reservists in Abu Ghraib Prison”. Zimbardo’s research has come to be known as one of the classical example of how circumstantial power has the ability to influence individuals in multiple domains. This experiment is historically one of the prime examples of how even the most “good” person when placed under specific situations can in turn transform into “evil”. It shows just how easily individuality can be stripped away and in turn how the environment can define and dictate ones…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip Zimbardo was born on March 23, 1933. He studied and attended both Brooklyn College and Yale University. He majored in three areas: sociology, anthropology, and psychology. In 1977, he developed the Stanford Shyness Clinic. The clinic helped people get over shyness in social environments.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Zimbardo’s experiment, he had two different groups of people, the prisoners and the guards. Zimbardo’s experiment was considered to be a mock prison in the basement of…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Zimbardo Research Paper

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a study conducted in 1971 by Dr. Phillip Zimbardo. According to Dr. Steve Taylor (2007), “It’s probably the best known psychological study of all time.” (Classic Studies in Psychology, 2007). Zimbardo stated that the point was to see what would happen if he put “really good people in a bad place” (Dr. Zimbardo, 2007). He did this during a time were most college students were protesting for peace and were against anything authoritarian. The experiment contained both positive and negative aspects; which will be discussed further in this paper.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    From this, Zimbardo learned that the situation over inherent characteristics was what essentially caused the behavior behind the guards, and…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Philip George Zimbardo is an American contemporary social psychologist and was a professor of psychology at Stanford University. Zimbardo is best known for his Stanford Prison Experiment where he wanted to explore the idea of power of anonymity which enables the tendency of violent behaviours regardless of if, they are overall good people. Therefore, he held an experiment with 24 “good apples” (Zimbardo 52) in a role-playing exercise that simulated prison life. He wanted to test how promptly a person is willing to uphold the roles of guards and prisoners. Moreover, in 1977 Zimbardo created a clinic called The Stanford Shyness Clinic where he wanted to help others overcome shyness.…

    • 601 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Perils Of Obedience

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Zimbardo wrote the Article over “The Stanford Prison Experiment”. He set up an experiment that would test how subjects conformed to roles they were given. He started the experiment by picking out subjects through the newspaper. Zimbardo got seventy-five males interested in completing the experiment. Then the subjects went…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    A Stimulated Prison Study

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For this reason, the study could not be replicated accurately today, and the problems raised could not be revisited in an experimental form (Haslam, & Redner, 2006). Zimbardo's professionalism was questionable, appointing himself as superintendent of the prison drew him into his study, losing his identity as a scientist. Falling into the role of prison commander, thus making decisions that were not that of a psychologist conducting an experiment but a participant in a game (Zimardo, 2007). Another criticism was that the right to withdraw had an effect on the results, allowing behaviour that was not typical to that of real life situations.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays