Campaign for Reforms to the failure of the Propaganda Movement
THE CAMPAIGN FOR REFORMS
The role of the Middle Class
The Middle Class began to take shape when Chinese and Spanish mestizos sought racial equality with the and Peninsulares. While the Insulares who were called Filipinos looked down on the natives as Indios.
The mestizos and Filipinos gained prominence during the Dela Torre Administration. On July 12, 1869, Dela Torre gave a toast to freedom attended by prominent Filipinos such as Fr. Jose Burgos, Maximo Paterno, Angel Garchitorena, Joaquin Pardo de Tavera, Andres Nieto and Manuel Genato that gave them a semblance of political authority. They were silenced in 1872 but will rise again during the Propaganda Movement.
The nature of the Reform Movement
The Reform Movement aimed for 1) Philippine representation to the Spanish Cortez 2) the conversion of the Philippines from Spanish colony to province
Of the two the latter is more important for it will institute reforms and eliminate the bigotry of the incompetent Spanish friars and officials and replaced by more intellectual representatives.
The Reformists were divided into the rich and the intellectuals and are co-operative of each other. Both groups abhor a revolution for the rich consider it a threat to their wealth while the intellectuals think it as a hindrance to their dream of assimilation for they think themselves as Hispanics as well.
The Great Reformers
Graciano Lopez Jaena – Born at Jaro, Iloilo on December 17, 1856. He studied at the Jaro Seminary and gained “notoriety” for his novel Fray Botod that tackles the incompetence, ignorance, immoralities and abuses of a common Spanish friar. In order to save himself he migrated to Spain in1880 and studied Medicine at the University of Valencia. He transferred to Madrid and frequented cafes and salons and distinguished himself as a great orator. In his speeches he lambasted the Spanish friars in the Philippines and defended the common Filipino.
His crowning glory was in 1882 when he made a stirring speech at the International Congress of Commercial Geography. In that occasion Fr. Ramon Martinez Vigil, spoke about the Spanish friar’s benevolent rule in the Philippines when all of a sudden Lopez-Jaena appeared and countered the talk with his own version of Spanish obstruction of progress in the Philippines.
The following year he gave a speech at the Teatro de Madrid that celebrated the 391st discovery of America, where he said that the Philippines is the heart of the world commerce and it pumps blood that travels to all the arteries of the world. The Venezuelan Minister to Spain, Dr. Luis Calcaño, stood from his seat and embrace Lopez-Jaena in the name of the Latin American people.
In 1889, the propaganda newspaper La Solidaridad came off the press and became its first editor with Pablo Rianzares as financier. Two years later Lopez-Jaena wrote a compendium of all his speeches in his article Discursos y Articulos Varios.
Lopez-Jaena was often drunk when he wrote speeches and talked in front of everyone. He often wore dirty clothes that his friends often gave him new clothes but end up in the pawnshop to buy a drink. He loves to eat sardines with his fingers and wiped it clean with his rags that he wear. His friends took advantage of his generosity by making him drunk and gave him time to write speeches. He died on January 30, 1896 at Barcelona due to tuberculosis.
Marcelo H. Del Pilar – Born at Kupang (Plaridel) Bulacan on August 30, 1850. His parents were Julian Del Pilar and Blasa Gatmaitan. He studied college at Colegio de San Jose and law at the University of Santo Tomas. His knowledge of law led him to the defense of his countrymen and was jailed for a month.
In 1878, he married his cousin Marciana and had several children with only his daughters Anita and Sofia surviving infancy. He continued his speeches at the market places, cockpits and social gatherings. He even insulted a Spanish friar by saying that Spanish priests in the Philippines are more miraculous than in Spain.
In 1888, he wrote pamphlets everyday to denounce the abuses of Spanish officials in the Philippines. Among those he lambasted was Fr. Jose Rodriguez who wrote Caingat Cayo that tagged Rizal’s Noli Me Tangere as a bad book and should not be read. Del Pilar countered this by creating his own pamphlet with the same title under the pseudonym Dolores Manapat whose aim is to reverse Fr. Rodriguez’s imagined allegations. He also wrote a parody of prayers under the general heading Dasalan at Tocsohan. Aside from his writings at the Sol he authored the following writings Dupluhan, Kadakilaan ng Dios, Pasiong dapat ipag-alab ng tauong balana, Sagot ng España sa hibik ng Filipinas, Dudas, La Sobrenia Monacal and La Frailocracia Filipina
The Sol which was the mouthpiece of the Propaganda Movement has numerous aims such as 1) secularization of the parishes 2) active participation of government affairs 3) freedom of speech and assembly 4) social and political freedom 5) equality before the law 6) assimilation and 7) representation to the Spanish Cortez.
His efforts proved futile as his aims all went down the drain. His last ditch effort was to begin a revolution as he called for a meeting of propagandists in Hong Kong. This did not happen as his funds and wealth are already depleted. To fight the bitter cold he picked up cigarette butts; his daughter Anita sent him one peso for his expenses however his time is at hand. Plaridel met his Creator on July 4, 1896. Spanish rivals gave him a tribute on the newspaper La Politica de España.
Jose Rizal – Our National Hero was born at Calamba, Laguna on June 19, 1861. He studied college at Ateneo Municipal and medicine & Philosophy and Letters at the University of Santo Tomas. He travelled to Spain, France, United Kingdom, Germany, Austria, Italy, Hong Kong, Japan, United States, Belgium, Switzerland, Macao, China, Singapore and Vietnam.
He wrote two novels Noli Me Tangere and El Filibusterismo. These novels were a revelation to Spanish injustice in the Philippines. He contributed to articles to the Sol and became a member of German scientific circles. He was arrested and deported to Dapitan. A military tribunal tried him for sedition and was sentenced to die by musketry on December 30, 1896.
La Solidaridad
The last two decades of the 19th Century brought change to the thinking of the Filipino Middle Class. Expatriate Filipinos led by Lopez-Jaena and Rizal formed Filipino Circle in 1882 that will also create its own newspaper. It did not materialize for it ran counter to the policies of the Ministry of Colonies. Eduardo de Lete formed an organ called España en Filipinas whose funds will come from the Philippines, however it failed again for the fund upon reaching Spain is too late. The organ ceased to exist.
The Sol came into existence on January 1, 1889 with the first issue coming off the press on the ides of February. Lopez-Jaena became its frist editor and was succeded by Plaridel in December of that same year.
The Sol is a bi-monthly newspaper that grew in circulation for Filipino patriots regularly sent contribution to finance its very exsitence.
Famous contributors of the said paper were Rizal (Dimas Alang and Laong Laan), Mariano Ponce (Tikabalang and Kalipulako), Del Pilar (Plaridel), and Jose Ma. Panganiban (Jomapa). The Spanish authorities managed to destroy some smuggled newspapers and yet it circulated. The Sol gained readers by its expose and humour that made idiots out of anti-Filipino writers like Wenceslao Retana (Desengaños), Pablo Feced (Quioquiap) and Vicente Barrantes. Due to differences among members and lack of funds its last issue came out on November 15, 1895.
Hispano-Filipino Association
The need for solidarity among the Filipinos were shared by their Spanish counterparts who believed in Spanish-Filipino assimilation. Several Iberian natives joined the cause of asking for reforms to the Mother Country with the creation of Association Hispano-Filipino on January 12, 1889. The leaders of the group were Miguel Morayta and Felipe dela Corte and divided the organ in three groups:
The Political section under Marcelo H. Del Pilar, the Literary Section under Mariano Ponce and the Sports section under Tomas Arejola. Certain laws for the colonies were passed by the Cortez. Philippine representation to the Cortez was approved by 52 provinces and was petitioned by Emilio Junoy on February 21, 1895 but to no avail. The Maura Law of 1893 compelled the teaching of the Spanish language but remained dormant for so long.
The Role of Masonry
The role of the masonry strengthened the passion for reforms in the Philippines. Graciano Lopez-Jaena formed his own Masonic Lodge Revolucion in 1889. The Lodge Solidaridad was formed in Madrid a year later and the remnants of the Revolucion were absorbed by Solidaridad.
The first Masonic Lodge in the Philippines was the Lodge Nilad established by Pedro Serrano-Laktaw and Antonio Luna. This was recognized by its mother lodge Gran Oriente Español two months later. As of May 1893, Masonic Lodges in the Philippines reached 35 with nine based in Manila
Rosario Villaruel became the very first Filipina Masonic member in the Philippines of the Lodge Walana in 1893. Other prominent female masons were Trinidad Rizal, Romualda Lanuza, Josefa Rizal, Marina Dizon, Sixta Fajardo, Valeriana Legazpi and Purificacion Leyva.
These masons will later form the propaganda and later revolutionary epochs of our country’s history. The Minister of Colonies later requested the Governor-General to remain vigilant for these masons will start the separatist movement of the Philippine Archipelago.
La Liga Filipina
In July 1892, Jose Rizal began a civic society called La Liga Filipina whose aim is to gain political concession from Mother Spain. Its members were mostly from the Middle Class. The officers were
President - Ambrosio Salvador
Fiscal - Agustin dela Rosa
Treasurer - Bonifacio Arevalo
Secretary - Deodato Arellano
The next day, Rizal was arrested upon orders of Gov. Eulogio Despujol and the Association was divided into Cuerpo de Compromisarios and the Katipunan. The Cuerpo is composed of the rich Liga members led by Domingo Franco but ceased to exist due to distrust among members
The Failure of the Reform Movement
The Sol managed to reveal the true Philippine situation to Mother Spain but many factors led to its failure among them are 1) The Spanish officials are busy with internal problems of their own and the friar-run daily La Politica de España en Filipinas reversed the Sol expose’s
The Filipino patrons of the Movement no longer sent funds for they think that what they are doing is destined to failure and are already looking for more radical alternatives. And the last reason was the propagandists were divided among themselves. Most of the members do not have the determination to continue that led to the weakening of the cause.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
3. The four major categories of anti-Mexicanist thought and provide an example for each of the four categories during the sixteenth through the eighteenth centuries. (Paredes. Pp. 91-121))…
- 273 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In 1910, the Mexican Revolution began in retaliation of the Mexican President Porfirio Diaz's dictatorship. Diaz was the dictator of Mexico and failed to support the lower classes of Mexico during his rule. During his years of ruling Mexico, a barrier between the poor class and rich class was obvious. Several families in Mexico, who were a minority of the fifteen million…
- 931 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
The story for Mexican-Americans is no different. The annexations of Texas in 1845 and the Mexican Cession in 1848 make evident the bulldozing efforts of the dominant Anglo culture to fulfill its “Manifest Destiny,” in spite its own declarations that “all men are created equal” and that the United States is a nation that believes in the personal freedoms of life, speech, property and religion. Confronted by the reality of Manifest Destiny and annexation, the new Mexican-Americans resisted the unjust domination of the U.S. Government and its citizens and challenged the broken promises of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Social banditry, the secret and nocturnal resistance of Las Gorras Blancas and their involvement in the newspaper La Voz del Pueblo and political party Partido del Pueblo Unido were different expressions of the Mexican response to the injustices they experienced by the United States and its Anglo citizens.…
- 5187 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays -
Mexico was no longer independent and the foreigners became involved politically for foreign benefits. The decline of Mexico’s majority due to malnutrition and low life expectancy and oppressed masses, the focus or “foci” of revolutions. The Mexican revolution of 1910 to 1920 was directed toward land reform after decades of remorseless ill treatment and poverty. Leaders like Francisco Madero and Emiliano…
- 693 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Therefore, it becomes necessary for people to acknowledge all the options on the table to crafted a vision and mission of the nation to proceed in the protection of peoples social, political and economic endeavors. Therefore, the Mexican revolution is leading example of a vision and mission of citizens to proceed in protection of peoples social, political and economic endeavors. the beginning of the 19th century found Mexico in tremendous material benefits accrued in the industrial, commercial and mining fields, but the aggressive modernization of the nation created discontent in the working and starving class. This discontent was fuel by Diaz land reforms and the slave conditions it created in rural areas that depended on native lands that were taken by the government. In addition, another element that fuel discontent were poor labor protections and little monetary rewards that kept people near…
- 656 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The revolution started due to dissatisfaction with the elite and oligarchical polies of the Dictator Porfirio Diaz. These polices were centered around the rich and wealth landowners, and was very hard on anyone below the lower middle class of society. When Diaz was opposed, he used his power to have his opponent through in prison until after the election. However, when his opponent Francisco Madero was released from prison he began a campaign for revolts against the current government. When these revolts started to occur, gangster like Poncho Villa , began to raid small government garrisons. This occurred until Diaz was…
- 413 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
* September 16 is a day of celebration all through Mexico. Even the president emerges from the royal palace, decorated with a sash to represent Mexico, rings a bell three times just as Miguel Hidalgo did on that same day in 1810 to commemorate the beginning of the revolution and to unite Mexico behind the ideals of equality and freedom that Miguel Hidalgo fought for. All Mexico celebrates on that day as one united country regardless of class or the color of one’s skin. Yet, the wars of independence from 1810 – 1821, according to Timothy J. Henderson in his historical account, The Mexican Wars of Independence, failed to realize the original ideals envisioned by its leaders. In the end, the compromise, ultimately reached in 1821, resulting in independence from Spain, deepened the already existing divisions of race, ethnicity, class, and regions. The revolution that was to ignite social, economic, and political change was doomed to fail not just because of military mistakes, class divisions and misunderstandings, but more importantly because of the deeply rooted social divisions created by 300 years of Spanish colonial rule, which were too difficult to change in a matter of years by the first leaders of the effort. Such change would take generations. Henderson’s argument is so well researched and written in a gripping style that it is impossible to attribute mythic status to the revolutionary heroes that Mexico values and praises to this day. Mexico still remains a society of divisions that were never addressed through Mexico’s independence because the final leader of the war of independence avoided it.…
- 3077 Words
- 13 Pages
Powerful Essays -
How Did the Rulers Decisions in the French and Mexican Rev. Trigger the Social Classes to Revolt?…
- 1662 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
During this time, Mexico's political elite began to divide into two opposing factions: conservatives and liberals. The conservatives favored a highly centralized government and wanted to maintain the Catholic Church's power and control of educational facilities.…
- 873 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Back in the year 1910, middle-class workers in Mexico protested the dictatorship of Porfirio Diaz who ruled for more than 30 years. (Knight, historytoday.com) It was the first major social revolution of the twentieth century. Like most dictatorships, power and wealth were only given to a select few, and injustice was everywhere. Diaz was not always a dictator, though. He was once a hero in an earlier revolution. Sadly, he didn’t know when to end his rule and kept his rule through bribery and rigging elections. Things such as the length of Diaz’s rule, the socioeconomic inequality, famines and food shortages, and political repression caused the people of Mexico to have a revolution. After the rule of Diaz, people thought that things would get…
- 1035 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Adan Escobedo HIST 4180/Colonial Mexico Dr. Mendiola Garcia December 10, 2014 The Bourbon Reform in New Spain The tides turned drastically as the Bourbon Reforms swept into Colonial Mexico with the collapse of the Hapsburgs. Spain by 1701 had established a new royal house: the Bourbons.…
- 2261 Words
- 10 Pages
Better Essays -
Nationalistic Cycle in Mexican Leo Mexican is one of the best countries to study the nationalistic cycle, from chaos to a revolution and then the increasing number of new leaders overthrew the elder government and leaders, they put the society into a golden age, but still need to improve. The revolution was during 1910 to 1920 because the regime of Diaz was overthrown and other leaders had different policy for the country. Much chaos happened but finally Carranza and other leaders led a golden age of Mexico. After that, the lack of freedom in the country eventually resulted in frequent military coups. Mexican from 1876-1910 was under the reign of Porfirio Diaz.…
- 957 Words
- 4 Pages
Better Essays -
The revolution was in part caused by unfair land reform policies. One policy that caused outrage among the indigenous peoples was the Ley de Terrenos Baldios, which caused 50 million hectares of land to be taken from indigenous farmers. One reaction to this was revolutionary leader Zapata’s Plan de Ayala, which called for the redistribution of land. The Ley de Terrenos Baldios shows the government’s disregard for the importance of farmers’ lives, while Zapata’s plan shows the people’s recognition of the government’s mistreatment. Unfair land reform caused negative reactions toward the government. One of the main revolutionary leaders’ entire platform was dedicated to land reform, showing that unfair land reform was a cause for revolution.…
- 439 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
The Mexican Revolution, which lasted from about 1910 to 1930, ended the dictatorship in Mexico and established a constitutional republic. Revolutionaries including Madero, Zapata and Villa led various groups that fought in a long and costly war. Although a constitution was drafted in 1917, periodic violence continued into the 1930’s. Political oppression led people, like Madero, to organize and revolt against an unjust government. The action of taking away native land from the natives was another step towards the advancement of the revolution. Before the war, people were deprived of their freedom to press and speech, and all was a result of the dictatorship of the Porfiriato.…
- 402 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
“Spanish America possessed few resources and faced tremendous obstacles” (Chasteen, John Charles). Liberals came to power and ruled these newly created states, but it was difficult for liberals to governate. They didn’t have the resources or the knowledge on how to run a country, all these time they had a long violent war and never an economic law. Liberalism didn’t have more social and economic and transformation that was seen more in England than in Spain and Portugal. Slavery was banished in all Latin America and slave citizens granted equal rights except in Brazil, Cuba and Puerto Rico. During this societies were very traditional and struggle for power between the Liberals and Conservatives. “Liberals sought 'government of the people, but in Latin America, liberal leaders, who were typically white and upper class, had mixed feelings about “the people.” They considered indigenous people and their lands a national problem, never a national assets.” (Chasteen, John Charles.) Even though it struggled during independent liberalism still remained one of the best exotic plant in Latin America soil. Conservatives had a different opinion about all that. Their leaders soon challenged to change the liberal agenda. Conservatives were different from liberals, “They proclaimed that the common people should know their place and…
- 1490 Words
- 6 Pages
Better Essays